1887
Volume 72, Issue 7
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Abstract

Transversely isotropic media with a tilted symmetry axis (TTI) exits widely underground due to tectonic movement and mineral orientation. Traditional full waveform inversion (FWI) based on isotropic media or transversely isotropic media with a vertical symmetry axis (VTI) cannot deal with such situations. To address this limitation, TTI–based FWI was developed. However, its practical application faces challenges in estimating the symmetry axis tilt angle . Previous studies have generally assumed that is equal to the strata dip angle, which is incorrect in complex structures such as salt domes and magmatic intrusion zones. Another theoretically robust way to estimate is to treat it as the parameter to be inverted, but there are still some problems unresolved. First, the parameter increases the nonlinearity of the inversion process, and its impact mechanism on inversion is not yet clear. Second, there is severe crosstalk (also known as trade‐off or coupling) between parameters, but the current parameter decoupling technique for TTI–based FWI is not mature. To address the first problem, we assess the interaction between and other parameters by analysing the radiation patterns in the TTI background. Our analysis reveals that is most coupled by S‐wave vertical velocity , and substantially affects anisotropic parameters and . Therefore, we conclude that a good inversion of velocity parameters is a prerequisite for recovering , and only after recovers can and be recovered. This conclusion provides a natural perspective for solving the second problem. We therefore propose a multi‐step and multi‐parameter joint inversion strategy to gradually improve the quality of parameter inversion and weaken their coupling. Numerical experiments demonstrate that our strategy achieves more accurate inversion results compared to previously proposed multi‐parameter inversion strategies. Finally, the application to the field OBN dataset acquired from the South China Sea verifies the practicality of our method.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13578
2024-08-23
2026-02-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alkhalifah, T. & Sava, P. (2010) A transversely isotropic medium with a tilted symmetry axis normal to the reflector. Geophysics, 75(3), A19–A24.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gholami, Y., Brossier, R., Operto, S., Prieux, V., Ribodetti, A. & Virieux, J. (2013) Which parameterization is suitable for acoustic vertical transverse isotropic full waveform inversion? Part 2: Synthetic and real data case studies from Valhall. Geophysics, 78(2), R107–R124.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. He, W. & Plessix, R.‐É. (2017) Analysis of different parameterizations of waveform inversion of compressional body waves in an elastic transverse isotropic earth with a vertical axis of symmetry. Geophysical Prospecting, 65, 1004–1024.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Huang, T., Xu, S. & Zhang, Y. (2007) Anisotropy estimation for prestack depth imaging—a tomographic approach [Expanded Abstracts]. In: 77th Annual International Meeting. SEG, Expanded Abstracts, pp. 124–128.
  5. Ivanov, Y. & Stovas, A. (2016) Upscaling in orthorhombic media: behavior of elastic parameters in heterogeneous fractured earth. Geophysics, 81(3), C113–C126.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kennett, B.L.N., Sambridge, M.S. & Williamson, P.R. (1988) Subspace methods for large inverse problems with multiple parameter classes. Geophysical Journal International, 94, 237–247.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Komatitsch, D. & Martin, R. (2007) An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer improved at grazing incidence for the seismic wave equation. Geophysics, 72(5), SM155–SM167.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lee, H.‐Y., Koo, J.M., Min, D.‐J., Kwon, B.‐D. & Yoo, H.S. (2010) Frequency‐domain elastic full waveform inversion for VTI media. Geophysical Journal International, 183, 884–904.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu, Y., Wu, Z., Kang, H. & Yang, J. (2020) Use of prismatic waves in full‐waveform inversion with the exact Hessian. Geophysics, 85(4), R325–R337.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Nocedal, J. & Wright, S.J. (2006) Numerical optimization, 2nd edition. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 101–131.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Oh, J.W., Shin, Y., Alkhalifah, T. & Min, D.J. (2020) Multistage elastic full‐waveform inversion for tilted transverse isotropic media. Geophysical Journal International, 223, 57–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Oropeza, E. & McMechan, G.A. (2014) Common‐reflection‐point migration velocity analysis of 2D P‐wave data from TTI media. Geophysics, 79(3), C65–C79.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Plessix, R.‐E. (2006) A review of the adjoint‐state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications. Geophysical Journal International, 167, 495–503.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Pratt, R. G., Shin, C., & Hicks, G. J. (1998). Gauss‐Newton and full Newton methods in frequency‐space seismic waveform inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 133(2), 341–362.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Prieux, V., Brossier, R., Gholami, Y., Operto, S., Virieux, J., Barkved, O.I. & Kommedal, J.H. (2011) On the footprint of anisotropy on isotropic full waveform inversion: the Valhall case study. Geophysical Journal International, 187, 1495–1515.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Rusmanugroho, H., Modrak, R. & Tromp, J. (2017) Anisotropic full‐waveform inversion with tilt‐angle recovery. Geophysics, 82(3), R135–R151.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Shen, X. (2012) Early‐arrival waveform inversion for near‐surface velocity and anisotropic parameter: parametrization study [Expanded Abstracts]. In: 82nd Annual International Meeting. Houston, TX, SEG. 1–5
  18. Singh, S., Tsvankin, I. & Naeini, E.Z. (2021) Facies‐based full‐waveform inversion for anisotropic media: a North Sea case study. Geophysical Prospecting, 69, 1650–1663.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Sirgue, L., Etgen, J.T. & Albertin, U. (2008) 3D frequency‐domain waveform inversion using time‐domain finite‐difference methods [Extended Abstracts]. In: 70th Annual International Conference and Exhibition. Utrecht, EAGE. pp. F022.
  20. Tarantola, A. (1984) Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics, 49, 1259–1266.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Tarantola, A. (1986) A strategy for nonlinear inversion of seismic reflection data. Geophysics, 51, 1893–1903.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Thomsen, L. (1986) Weak elastic‐anisotropy. Geophysics, 51(10), 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Tsvankin, I. (2012) Seismic signatures and analysis of reflection data in anisotropic media, 3rd edition. Houston, TX, SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Virieux, J. (1986) P–SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media, velocity stress finite difference method. Geophysics, 51, 889–901.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Virieux, J. & Operto, S. (2009) An overview of full‐waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics, 74(6), WCC1–WCC26.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhou, C., Jiao, J., Lin, S., Sherwood, J. & Brandsberg‐Dahl, S. (2011) Multiparameter joint tomography for TTI model building. Geophysics, 76(5), WB183–WB190.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13578
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13578
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error