1887
Volume 72, Issue 8
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Abstract

By directly solving the full two‐way wave equation, reverse time migration has superiority over other imaging algorithms in handling steeply dipping structures and other complicated geological models. Moreover, by incorporating the asymptotic inversion operator into reverse time migration imaging condition, the imaging algorithm is able to give a quantitative estimation of parameter perturbation in high‐frequency approximation sense. However, because conventional asymptotic inversion only accounts for geometrical spreading, uneven illumination due to irregular acquisition geometry and inhomogeneous subsurface at each image point is neglected. The omit of illumination compensation significantly affects the imaging quality. Wave‐equation‐based illumination compensation methods have been extensively studied in the past. However, the traditional wave‐equation‐based illumination compensation methods usually require high computational cost and huge storage. In this paper, we propose an efficient wave‐equation‐based illumination compensation method. Under high‐frequency approximation, we first define a Jacobian determinant to measure the regularity of subsurface illumination, and then illumination compensation operators are proposed based on the Jacobian. Through boundary integration, we further express the illumination compensation operators through extrapolated wavefields; the explicit computation of asymptotic Green's functions is thus avoided, and an efficient illumination compensation implementation for reverse time migration is achieved. Numerical results with both synthetic and field data validate the effectiveness and efficiency of the presented method.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13581
2024-09-15
2026-02-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Albertin, U., Jaramillo, H., Yingst, D., Bloor, R., Chang, W. & Beasley, C. (1999) Aspects of true amplitude migration. In: SEG technical program expanded abstracts. Houston, TX, SEG. pp. 1358–1361.
  2. Audebert, F., Froidevaux, P., Huard, I., Nicoletis, L. & Svay‐Lucas, J. (2000) A multi‐angle toolbox for restored amplitude images and AVA‐Gathers. In: SEG technical program expanded abstracts. Houston, TX, SEG. pp. 2484.
  3. Baysal, E., Kosloff, D.D. & Sherwood, J.W. (1983) Reverse time migration. Geophysics, 48(11), 1514–1524.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Berteussen, K.A. & Ursin, B. (1983) Approximate computation of the acoustic impedance from seismic data. Geophysics, 48(10), 1351–1358.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Beydoun, W.B. & Jin, S. (1994) Born or Kirchoff migration/inversion: what is the Earth's point of view?. In: Mathematical methods in geophysical imaging II 1994, vol. 2301. California: International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp. 82–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Beylkin, G. (1985) Imaging of discontinuities in the inverse scattering problem by inversion of a causal generalized Radon transform. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 26, 99–108.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bleistein, N. (1987) On the imaging of reflectors in the earth. Geophysics, 52, 931–942.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bleistein, N., Cohen, J.K. & Stockwell, J.W. (2001) Mathematics of multidimensional seismic inversion. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag NewYork, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bleistein, N., Zhang, Y., Xu, S., Zhang, G. & Gray, S.H. (2005) Migration/inversion: think image point coordinates, process in acquisition surface coordinates. Inverse Problems, 21(5), 1715.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cao, J. (2013) Resolution/illumination analysis and imaging compensation in 3D dip‐azimuth domain. In: SEG technical program expanded abstracts. Houston, TX, SEG. pp. 3931–3936.
  11. Cao, J. & Wu, R.‐S. (2009) Fast acquisition aperture correction in prestack depth migration using beamlet decomposition. Geophysics, 74(4), S67–S74.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Červený, V. (2001) Seismic ray theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chauris, H. & Cocher, E. (2017) From migration to inversion velocity analysis. Geophysics, 82(3), S207–S223.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dablain, M.A. (1986) The application of high order differencing for the scalar wave equation. Geophysics, 51, 54–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Devaney, A.J. (2012) Mathematical foundations of imaging, tomography and wavefield inversion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Esmersoy, C. & Miller, D. (1989) Backprojection versus backpropagation in multidimensional linearized inversion. Geophysics, 54(7), 921–926.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Esmersoy, C. & Oristaglio, M. (1988) Reverse‐time wave‐field extrapolation, imaging, and inversion. Geophysics, 53(7), 920–931.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fletcher, R.P., Nichols, D., Bloor, R. & Coates, R.T. (2016) Least‐squares migration—data domain versus image domain using point spread functions. The Leading Edge, 35(2), 157–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gelius, L.J., Lecomte, I. & Tabti, H. (2002) Analysis of the resolution function in seismic prestack depth imaging. Geophysical Prospecting, 50(5), 505–515.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gherasim, M., Albertin, U., Nolte, B., Askim, O.J., Trout, M. & Hartman, K. (2010) Wave‐equation angle‐based illumination compensation operatoring for optimized subsalt imaging. In: SEG technical program expanded abstracts. Houston, TX, Society of Exploration Geophysicists. pp. 3293–3297.
  21. Guitton, A. (2004) Amplitude and kinematic corrections of migrated images for nonunitary imaging operators. Geophysics, 69(4), 1017–1024.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hou, J. & Symes, W.W. (2017) An alternative formula for approximate extended Born inversion. Geophysics, 82(1), S1–S8.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hu, J., Schuster, G.T. & Valasek, P.A. (2001) Poststack migration deconvolution. Geophysics, 66(3), 939–952.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Jin, S., Madariaga, R., Virieux, J. & Lambaré, G. (1992) Two‐dimensional asymptotic iterative elastic inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 108, 575–588.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kiyashchenko, D.Plessix, R.E. & Kashtan, B. (2007) Modified imaging principle: an alternative to preserved‐amplitude least‐squares wave‐equation migration. Geophysics, 72(6), S221–S230.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, Z., Tang, B. & Ji, S. (2012) Subsalt illumination analysis using RTM 3D dip gathers. In: SEG technical program expanded abstracts. Houston, TX, SEG. pp. 1–6.
  27. Mao, J. & Wu, R.‐S. (2011) Fast image decomposition in dip‐angle domain and its application for illumination compensation [Expanded abstracts]. In: 81st Annual International Meeting. Houston, TX, SEG. pp. 3201–3205.
  28. McMechan, G.A. (1983) Migration by extrapolation of time‐dependent boundary values. Geophysical Prospecting, 31(3), 413–420.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Miller, D., Oristaglio, M. & Beylkin, G. (1987) A new slant on seismic imaging: migration and integral geometry. Geophysics, 52, 943–964.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Operto, M., Xu, S. & Lambaré, G. (2000) Can we quantitatively image complex structures with rays?Geophysics, 65, 1223–1238.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Plessix, R.E. & Mulder, W.A. (2004) Frequency‐domain finite‐difference amplitude‐preserving migration. Geophysical Journal International, 157(3), 975–987.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ren, H., Wu, R.S. & Wang, H. (2011) Wave equation least square imaging using the local angular Hessian for amplitude correction. Geophysical Prospecting, 59(4), 651–661.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Rickett, J.E. (2003) Illumination‐based normalization for wave‐equation depth migration. Geophysics, 68(4), 1371–1379.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rousseau, V., Nicoletis, L., Svay‐Lucas, J. & Rakotoarisoa, H. (2000) 3D true amplitude migration by regularization in angle domain. In: 62nd EAGE Conference and Exhibition. Utrecht, the Netherlands, EAGE.pp.cp‐28‐00050.
  35. Schleicher, J., Tygel, M. & Hubral, P. (1993). 3‐D true‐amplitude finite‐offset migration. Geophysics, 58(8), 1112–1126.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Shen, H., Mothi, S. & Albertin, U. (2011) Improving subsalt imaging with illumination‐based weighting of RTM 3D angle gathers. In: SEG technical program expanded abstracts. Houston, TX, SEG. pp. 3206–3211.
  37. Shuey, R.T. (1985) A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations. Geophysics, 50(4), 609–614.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. ten Kroode, F. (2012) A wave‐equation‐based Kirchhoff operator. Inverse Problems, 28(11), 115013.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Tygel, M., Schleicher, J. & Hubral, P. (1994) Pulse distortion in depth migration. Geophysics, 59(10), 1561–1569.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wapenaar, C.P.A. & Berkhout, A.J. (1989) Elastic wave field extrapolation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Wapenaar, K., van Wijngaarden, A.J., van Geloven, W. & van der Leij, T. (1999) Apparent AVA effects of fine layering. Geophysics, 64(6), 1939–1948.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Whitmore, N.D. (1983) Iterative depth migration by backward time propagation. In: SEG technical program expanded abstracts 1983. Houston, TX, SEG. pp. 382–385.
  43. Wu, R.S. & Chen, L. (2002) Mapping directional illumination and acquisition‐aperture efficacy by beamlet propagators [Expanded abstracts]. In: 72nd Annual International Meeting. Houston, TX, SEG. pp. 1352–1355.
  44. Wu, R.S., Luo, M.Q., Chen, S.C. & Xie, X.B. (2004), Acquisition aperture correction in angle‐domain and true‐amplitude imaging for wave equation migration [Expanded abstracts]. In: 74th Annual International Meeting. Houston, TX, SEG. pp. 937–940.
  45. Xie, X.B., Wu, R. S., Fehler, M. & Huang, L. (2005) Seismic resolution and illumination: a wave‐equation‐based analysis [Expanded abstracts]. In: 75th Annual International Meeting. Houston, TX, SEG. pp. 1862–1865.
  46. Xu, S., Chauris, H., Lambaré, G. & Noble, M. (2001) Common‐angle migration: a strategy for imaging complex media. Geophysics, 66, 1877–1894.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Xu, S., Zhang, Y. & Tang, B. (2011) 3D angle gathers from reverse time migration. Geophysics, 76(2), S77–S92.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Yan, R., Guan, H., Xie, X.B. & Wu, R.S. (2014) Acquisition aperture correction in the angle domain toward true‐reflection reverse time migration. Geophysics, 79(6), S241–S250.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Yan, Z. & Xie, X.B. (2016) Full‐wave seismic illumination and resolution analyses: a poynting‐vector‐based method. Geophysics, 81(6), S447–S458.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Yoon, K. & Marfurt, K.J. (2006) Reverse‐time migration using the poynting‐vector. Exploration Geophysics, 37(1), 102–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang, D., Fei, T.W. & Luo, Y. (2018) Improving reverse time migration angle gathers by efficient wavefield separation. Geophysics, 83(2), S187–S195.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhang, Y., Zhang, G. & Bleistein, N. (2003) True amplitude wave equation migration arising from true amplitude one‐way wave equations. Inverse Problems, 19(5), 1113.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang, Y., Zhang, G. & Bleistein, N. (2005) Theory of true‐amplitude one‐way wave equations and true‐amplitude common‐shot migration. Geophysics, 70(4), E1–E10.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang, Y., Xu, S., Bleistein, N. & Zhang, G. (2007) True amplitude angle domain common image gathers from one‐way wave equation migrations. Geophysics, 72(1), S49–S58.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhang, Y. & Sun, J. (2009) Practical issues in reverse time migration: true amplitude gathers, noise removal and harmonic source encoding. First Break, 27(1), 26.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13581
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13581
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): data processing; illumination compensation; imaging; reverse time migration; seismics

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error