1887
Volume 72, Issue 7
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Abstract

Acoustic logging is an important method used to determine formation velocities near boreholes. However, in practice, determining accurate formation velocities from acoustic logging data is challenging because of the presence of various noise interferences. Accordingly, a method to increase the amplitudes of refracted waves in open boreholes is proposed herein on the basis of the directional radiation technology of pulse compression signal–driven linear phased array acoustic transmitters. The waveforms generated by a Ricker monopole acoustic transmitter, linear frequency modulation monopole acoustic transmitter and pulse compression signal–driven linear phased array acoustic transmitter in a fluid‐filled open borehole are numerically simulated by employing the finite‐difference method. The effects of the pulse compression signal–driven linear phased array parameters on the amplitudes of the refracted compressional and shear waves are studied. Results show that borehole mode waves with the same velocities and dispersion characteristics can be determined using the pulse compression signal–driven linear phased array acoustic and Ricker monopole acoustic transmitters in fluid‐filled open boreholes. Pulse compression signal–driven linear phased array acoustic transmitters leverage the advantages of pulse compression and phased array technologies, ensuring that a single element can radiate more acoustic energy, whereas pulse compression signal–driven linear phased array parameters can be modulated to further increase the amplitudes of the refracted compressional and shear waves. Compared with Ricker and linear frequency modulation monopole acoustic transmitters, pulse compression signal–driven linear phased array acoustic transmitters can provide downhole received waveforms of better quality and improved a signal‐to‐noise ratio of the mode wave dispersion curves obtained using the downhole received waveforms. Because pulse compression signal–driven linear phased array acoustic transmitters use linear frequency modulation drive signals of longer duration, the recording time required for the received waveforms is also longer and the amount of data generated is larger, presenting new challenges for downhole data processing and high‐speed data transmission.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13582
2024-08-23
2026-03-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bull, J.M., Gutowski, M., Dix, J.K., Henstock, T.J., Hogarth, P., Leighton, T.G. et al. (2005) Design of a 3D chirp sub‐bottom imaging system. Marine Geophysical Researches, 26, 157–169. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11001‐005‐3715‐8.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Che, X.H., Wang, R.J. & Qiao, W.X. (2012) A denoising method based on modified matrix pencil algorithm and FK filter. In: In 5Th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, CISP 2012,. Chongqing, China, IEEE. pp. 1542–1545. http://doi.org/10.1109/CISP.2012.6469734
  3. Che, X.H. & Qiao, W.X. (2004) Acoustic field in formation generated by linear phased array transmitters in fluid‐filled boreholes. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 47, 830–836. http://doi.org/10.1002/cjg2.3556.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, B.X. & Zhang, Y. (2002) Sonic full wave logging data processing technique and its applications. Well Logging Technology, 26, 369–372. http://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004‐1338.2002.05.004.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheng, X.Y., Ju, X.D., Lu, J.Q. & Qiao, W.X. (2007) Design of downhole multipole acoustic transducer transmitter with high power. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 31, 40–43. http://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000‐5870.2007.06.009.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Close, D., Cho, D., Horn, F. & Edmundson, H. (2009) The sound of sonic: a historical perspective and introduction to acoustic logging. CSEG Recorder, 34, 34–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cowe, J., Gittins, J. & Evans, D.H. (2008) Improving performance of pulse compression in a Doppler ultrasound system using amplitude modulated chirps and Wiener filtering. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 34, 326–333. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.08.001.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Drossaert, F.H. & Giannopoulos, A. (2007) A nonsplit complex frequency‐shifted PML based on recursive integration for FDTD modeling of elastic waves. Geophysics, 72, T9–T17. http://doi.org/10.1190/1.2424888.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ekstrom, M.P. (1995) Dispersion estimation from borehole acoustic arrays using a modified matrix pencil algorithm. In: Conference record of the twenty‐ninth asilomar conference on signals, systems and computers, vol. 1. New York, IEEE. pp. 449–453. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSSC.1995.540589.
  10. Franco, J.L.A., Ortiz, M.A.M., De, G.S., Renlie, L. & Williams, S. (2006) Sonic investigations in and around the borehole. Oilfield Review, 18, 14–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kimball, C.V. & Marzetta, T.L. (1984) Semblance processing of borehole acoustic array data. Geophysics, 49, 274–281. http://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441659.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu, X.P., Ju, X.D., Deng, L., Lu, J.Q. & Men, B.Y. (2011) The design of FIR digital filter applied in acoustic logging. Science Technology and Engineering, 11, 3536–3539. http://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671‐1815.2011.15.039.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lu, J.Q., Ju, X.D. & Cheng, X.Y. (2009) Transducer firing method for multi‐pole array acoustic logging tool. High Voltage Engineering, 35, 324–328.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Montone, P. & Mariucci, M.T. (2015) P‐wave velocity, density, and vertical stress magnitude along the crustal po plain (Northern Italy) from sonic log drilling data. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 172, 1547–1561. http://doi.org/10.3969/10.1007/s00024‐014‐1022‐5.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Randall, C.J., Scheibner, D.J. & Wu, P.T. (1991) Multipole borehole acoustic waveforms; synthetic logs with beds and borehole washouts. Geophysics, 56, 1757–1769. http://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442988.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Tang, X.M. & Cheng, C.H.A. (2004) Quantitative borehole acoustic methods. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Tang, X. & Patterson, D.J. (2009) Single‐well S‐wave imaging using multicomponent dipole acoustic‐log data. Geophysics, 74, WCA211–WCA223. http://doi.org/10.1190/1.3227150.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Thakur, A. & Talluri, S.R. (2018) Comparative analysis on pulse compression with classical orthogonal polynomials for optimized time‐bandwidth product. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 9, 1791–1797. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2017.01.003.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Walker, K., Granville, J., Kainer, G. & Cheng, A. (2015) Logging services: towards the 3D measurement of formation properties in high‐resolution with a continuous depth of investigation. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, formation evaluation & management, Houston, USA. Calgary, Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE‐175093‐MS. http://doi.org/10.2118/175093‐MS.
  20. Wang, T. & Tang, X. (2003) Finite‐difference modeling of elastic wave propagation: a nonsplitting perfectly matched layer approach. Geophysics, 68, 1749–1755. http://doi.org/10.1190/1.1620648.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, Z.W., Liu, J.H., Yue, C.W., Li, X.C. & Li, C.C. (2009) The filtering characteristics of HHT and its application in acoustic log waveform signal processing. Applied Geophysics, 6, 8–16. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11770‐009‐0007‐0.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Winbow, G.A. (1988) A theoretical study of acoustic S‐wave and P‐wave velocity logging with conventional and dipole sources in soft formations. Geophysics, 53, 1334–1342. http://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442411.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Xiao, H.B., Yang, J.Z., Ju, X.D. & Qiao, W.X. (2009) Application of V‐system in acoustic logging while drilling data denoising. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 33, 58–62. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673‐5005.2009.02.011.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Xu, L.M. (2018) Application of full frequency wavelet denoising method in quadrupole logging while drilling. Progress in Geophysics, 33, 2034–2040. http://doi.org/10.6038/pg2018BB0425.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Yang, S., Qiao, W. & Che, X. (2019a). Numerical simulation of acoustic field in logging‐while‐drilling borehole generated by linear phased array acoustic transmitter. Geophysical Journal International, 217, 1080–1088. http://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz071.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Yang, S., Qiao, W. & Che, X. (2019b) Numerical simulation of acoustic fields in formation generated by linear phased array acoustic transmitters during logging while drilling. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 182, 106184. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106184.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13582
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13582
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): acoustics; borehole geophysics; logging; numerical study; wave

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error