1887
Volume 72, Issue 9
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Abstract

Crystalline rocks in the subsurface are of interest for geothermal energy extraction, nuclear waste storage, and, when weathered or fractured, as aquifers. Compliant discontinuities such as microcracks, cracks and fractures may nucleate and propagate due to changes in pore pressure, stress and temperature. These discontinuities may provide flow pathways for fluids and, if fracturing extends to surrounding rocks, may allow escape of fluids to neighbouring formations. Monitoring such rocks using sonic logs, passive seismic, borehole seismic and surface seismic requires understanding of the propagation of elastic waves in the presence of such discontinuities. These may have an anisotropic orientation distribution as in situ stress may be anisotropic. As crystalline rock may display intrinsic anisotropy due to foliation and the preferential orientation of anisotropic minerals, quantification of the relative importance of intrinsic and microcrack‐induced anisotropy is important. This may be achieved based on the stress sensitivity of elastic wave velocities. A method that allows both the orientation distribution of microcracks and the stress dependence of their normal and shear compliance to be estimated independently of the elastic anisotropy of the background rock is presented. Results are given for anisotropic samples of gneiss from Bukov in the Czech Republic and granite from Grimsel in Switzerland based on the ultrasonic velocity measurements of Aminzadeh et al. The microcrack orientation distribution is approximately transversely isotropic for both samples with a preferred orientation of microcrack normals perpendicular to foliation. This preferred alignment is stronger in the sample of gneiss than in the granite sample, and the normal and shear compliance of the microcracks decreases with increasing compressive stress. This occurs because the contact between opposing faces of the discontinuities grows with increasing compressive stress, and this results in a decrease in elastic anisotropy with increasing compressive stress. At low stress, the ratio of microcrack normal compliance to shear compliance is approximately 0.25 for the granite sample and 0.7 for the sample of gneiss. The normal compliance for both samples decreases faster with increasing compressive stress than the shear compliance , resulting in a decrease in / with increasing compressive stress.

© 2024 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. © 2024 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13593
2024-10-11
2026-02-15

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13593
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allis, R., Gwynn, M., Hardwick, C., Hurlbut, W. & Moore, J. (2018) Thermal characteristics of the FORGE site, Milford, Utah. Geothermal Resources Council Transactions, 42, 15.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Aminzadeh, A., Petružálek, M., Vavryčuk, V., Ivankina, T.I., Svitek, T., Petrlíková, A. et al. (2022) Identification of higher symmetry in triclinic stiffness tensor: application to high pressure dependence of elastic anisotropy in deep underground structures. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 158, 105168.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Chapman, M. (2003) Frequency‐dependent anisotropy due to meso‐scale fractures in the presence of equant porosity. Geophysical Prospecting, 51(5), 369–379.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Cowin, S.C. & Mehrabadi, M.M. (1987) On the identification of material symmetry for anisotropic elastic materials. The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, 40(4), 451–476.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Collet, O., Gurevich, B., Madadi, M. & Pervukhina, M. (2014) Modeling elastic anisotropy resulting from the application of triaxial stress. Geophysics, 79(5), C135–C145.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Fredrich, J.T. & Wong, T.F. (1986) Micromechanics of thermally induced cracking in three crustal rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 91(B12), 12743–12764.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Gagliardini, O. & Meyssonnier, J. (1999) Analytical derivations for the behavior and fabric evolution of a linear orthotropic ice polycrystal. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 104(B8), 17797–17809.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Galvin, R.J., Gurevich, B. & Sayers, C.M. (2007) Fluid‐dependent shear‐wave splitting in a poroelastic medium with conjugate fracture sets. Geophysical Prospecting, 55(3), 333–343.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Gillet‐Chaulet, F., Gagliardini, O., Meyssonnier, J., Zwinger, T. & Ruokolainen, J. (2006) Flow‐induced anisotropy in polar ice and related ice‐sheet flow modelling. Journal of Non‐Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 134(1–3), 33–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Gurevich, B., Pervukhina, M. & Makarynska, D. (2011) An analytic model for the stress‐induced anisotropy of dry rocks. Geophysics, 76(3), WA125–WA133.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Gustafson, G. & Krásný, J. (1994) Crystalline rock aquifers: their occurrence, use and importance. Applied Hydrogeology, 2, 64–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Gwynn, M., Allis, R., Hardwick, C., Jones, C., Nielsen, P. & Hurlbut, W. (2019) Compilation of rock properties from FORGE well 58‐32, Milford, Utah. In: Geothermal characteristics of the Roosevelt hot springs system and adjacent FORGE EGS site, Milford, Utah. Salt Lake City, UT: Utah Geological Survey Miscellaneous Publication, p. 169.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Hudson, J.A., Liu, E. & Crampin, S. (1996) The mechanical properties of materials with interconnected cracks and pores. Geophysical Journal International, 124(1), 105–112.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Jones, C.G., Moore, J.N. & Simmons, S. (2019) Petrography of the Utah FORGE site and environs, Beaver County, Utah. In: Allis, R. & Moore, J.N. (Eds.) Geothermal characteristics of the Roosevelt hot springs system and adjacent FORGE EGS site, Milford, Utah. Salt Lake City, UT: Utah Geological Survey Miscellaneous Publication, p. 23.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Kachanov, M. (1992) Effective elastic properties of cracked solids: critical review of some basic concepts. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 45, 304–335.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Kachanov, M. (1993) Elastic solids with many cracks and related problems. Advances in Applied Mechanics, 30, 259–445.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Kington, J. (2016) Mplstereonet. Available at: https://github.com/joferkington/mplstereonet (Accessed February 22, 2024)
  18. Kouassi, K.J.M., Lachassagne, P., Mangoua, O.M.J., Sombo, A.P. & Dibi, B. (2024) Identifying the origin of springs in weathered‐fractured crystalline aquifers using a hydrogeophysical approach. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 12977.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Lebedev, V.I. (1976) Quadratures on a sphere. USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 16, 10–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Lokajíček, T. & Svitek, T. (2015) Laboratory measurement of elastic anisotropy on spherical rock samples by longitudinal and transverse sounding under confining pressure. Ultrasonics, 56, 294–302.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. MacBeth, C. (2004) A classification for the pressure‐sensitive properties of a sandstone rock frame. Geophysics, 69, 497–510.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Madadi, M., Pervukhina, M. & Gurevich, B. (2013) Modelling elastic anisotropy of dry rocks as a function of applied stress. Geophysical Prospecting, 61, (2‐Rock Physics for Reservoir Exploration, Characterisation and Monitoring), 391–403.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Mauge, C. & Kachanov, M. (1992) Interacting arbitrarily oriented cracks in anisotropic matrix‐stress intensity factors and effective moduli. International Journal of Fracture, 58(4), R69–R74.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Mauge, C. & Kachanov, M. (1994) Effective elastic properties of an anisotropic material with arbitrarily oriented interacting cracks. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 42(4), 561–584.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Mavko, G., Mukerji, T. & Godfrey, N. (1995) Predicting stress‐induced velocity anisotropy of rocks. Geophysics, 60, 1081–1087.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Miller, D.E. & Spencer, C. (1994) An exact inversion for anisotropic moduli from phase slowness data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 99(B11), 21651–21657.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Moore, J., McLennan, J., Allis, R., Pankow, K., Simmons, S., Podgorney, R. et al. (2018) The Utah frontier observatory for geothermal research (FORGE): results of recent drilling and geoscientific surveys. In: Geothermal Resources Council 2018 Annual Meeting: Geothermal's Role in Today's Energy Market, GRC Transactions, Vol. 42, 2018 (pp. 1128‐1143). Geothermal Resources Council.
  28. Murphy, H.D., Tester, J.W., Grigsby, C.O. & Potter, R.M. (1981) Energy extraction from fractured geothermal reservoirs in low‐permeability crystalline rock. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 86(B8), 7145–7158.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Nye, J.F. (1985) Physical properties of crystals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Paillet, F.L. (1991) Use of geophysical well logs in evaluating crystalline rocks for siting of radioactive‐waste repositories. The Log Analyst, 32(02), 85–107.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Pearson, C.F., Fehler, M.C. & Albright, J.N. (1983) Changes in compressional and shear wave velocities and dynamic moduli during operation of a hot dry rock geothermal system. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 88(B4), 3468–3475.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Pervukhina, M., Gurevich, B., Golodoniuc, P. & Dewhurst, D.N. (2011) Parameterization of elastic stress sensitivity in shales. Geophysics, 76(3), WA147–WA155.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Pointer, T., Liu, E. & Hudson, J.A. (2000) Seismic wave propagation in cracked porous media. Geophysical Journal International, 142(1), 199–231.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Pros, Z. & Babuška, V. (1968) An apparatus for investigating the elastic anisotropy on spherical rock samples. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 12(2), 192–198.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Sayers, C.M. (1988) Stress‐induced ultrasonic wave velocity anisotropy in fractured rock. Ultrasonics, 26(6), 311–317.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Sayers, C.M. (2007a) Asymmetry in the time‐lapse seismic response to injection and depletion. Geophysical Prospecting, 55, 699–705.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Sayers, C.M. (2007b) Effects of borehole stress concentration on elastic wave velocities in sandstones. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 44(7), 1045–1052.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Sayers, C.M. & Kachanov, M. (1995) Microcrack‐induced elastic wave anisotropy of brittle rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100, 4149–4156.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Schlömer, N., Papior, N., Arnold, D., Blechta, J. & Zetter, R. (2022) quadpy: Numerical integration (quadrature, cubature) in Python. Available at: https://github.com/sigma‐py/quadpy (Accessed November 17, 2023)
  40. Schoenberg, M. (1980) Elastic wave behavior across linear slip interfaces. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68(5), 1516–1521.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Schoenberg, M. (2002) Time‐dependent anisotropy induced by pore pressure variation in fractured rock. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 11, 83–105.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Svitek, T., Vavryčuk, V., Lokajíček, T. & Petružálek, M. (2014) Determination of elastic anisotropy of rocks from P‐and S‐wave velocities: numerical modelling and lab measurements. Geophysical Journal International, 199(3), 1682–1697.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Thomsen, L. (1986) Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics, 51, 1954–1966.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Ting, T.C. (1996) Anisotropic elasticity: theory and applications, vol. 45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Tsvankin, I. (1997) Anisotropic parameters and P‐wave velocity for orthorhombic media. Geophysics, 62, 1292–1309.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Vlastos, S., Liu, E., Main, I.G., Schoenberg, M., Narteau, C., Li, X.Y. et al. (2006) Dual simulations of fluid flow and seismic wave propagation in a fractured network: effects of pore pressure on seismic signature. Geophysical Journal International, 166(2), 825–838.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Voigt, W. (1928) Lehrbuch der Kristallphysik. Leipzig, Berlin: B.G. Teubner.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Wynn, J.C. & Roseboom, E.H. (1987) Role of geophysics in identifying and characterizing sites for high‐level nuclear waste repositories. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 92(B8), 7787–7796.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13593
Loading
Characterization of stress‐dependent microcrack compliance and orientation distribution in anisotropic crystalline rocks
Geophysical Prospecting 72, 3511 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.13593
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13593
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13593
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): anisotropy; elastics; reservoir geophysics; rock physics; seismic

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error