Longitudinal electrical resistivity tomography interpretation: Numerical modelling

References

1. Bievre, G., Oxarango, L., Günther, T., Goutaland, D. & Massardi, M. (2018) Improvement of 2D ERT measurements conducted along a small earth‐filled dyke using 3D topographic data and 3D computation of geometric factors. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 153, 100–112.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bobachyev, A.A. (2003) Resheniye pryamykh i obratnykh zadach elektrorazvedki metodom soprotivleniy dlya slozhno‐postroyennykh sred [Thesis] (in Russian). Moscow, Moscow State University. http://geophys01.geol.msu.ru/links.htm#VES‐IP%20software
3. Camarero, P.L. & Moreira, C.A. (2017) Geophysical investigation of earth dam using the electrical tomography resistivity technique. REM—International Engineering Journal, 70(1), 47–52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/0370‐44672016700099
   [Google Scholar]
4. Fargier, Y., Fauchard, C., Mеriaux, P., Royet, P., Palma‐Lopes, S., François, D. et al (2012) Methodology applied to the diagnosis and monitoring of dikes and dams. In: Luo, Y. (Ed.) Novel approaches and their applications in risk assessment. Croatia: IntechOpen, pp. 263–279, Available from: https://doi.org/10.5772/16318
   [Google Scholar]
5. Fauchard, C. & Mériaux, P. (2007) Geophysical and geotechnical methods for diagnosing flood protection dikes guide for implementation and interpretation. France: éditions Quae.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Hojat, A., Arosio, D., Loke, M.H., Longoni, L., Papini, M., Tresoldi, G. et al. (2019) Assessment of 3D geometry effects on 2D ERT data of a permanent monitoring system along a river embankment. In: EAGE‐GSM 2nd Asia pacific meeting on near surface geoscience and engineering. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers. pp. 1–5.
7. Kaminsky, A.E. (2023) Zond software ver. (2023). Program for 2D interpretation of resistivity and induced polarization data (ground, borehole, and aquatory versions) [Zond Software ver. 2023]: Paphos, Cyprus, Zond Software LTD. http://zond‐geo.com/english/zond‐software/ert‐and‐ves/zondres2d/
8. Karaoulis, M., Revil, A., Tsourlos, P., Werkema, D.D. & Minsley, B.J. (2013) IP4DI: asoftwarefortime‐lapse2D/3DDC‐resistivity and induced polarization tomography. Computers & Geosciences, 54(2013), 164–170. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.01.008
   [Google Scholar]
9. Kayode, O.T., Odukoya, A.M., Adagunodo, T.A. & Adeniji, A.A. (2018): Monitoring of seepages around dams using geophysical methods: a brief review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 173, 493–499. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755‐1315/173/1/012026/pdf
   [Google Scholar]
10. Krasnikov, G.E., Nagornov, O.V. & Starostin, N.V. (2012) Modeling of physical processes using the COMSOL Multiphysics package: study guide for universities. Moscow: National Research Nuclear University “Moscow Engineering Physics Institute”.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Koefoed, O. (1979) Geosounding principles: resistivity sounding measurements. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kurniawan, A. (2009) Basic IP2 win tutorial. Basic principles in using IP 2 Win Software. Manual for ipi2win. Hydrogeology world. Available at: http://geophys01.geol.msu.ru/ipi2win.htm
13. Loke, M.H. (2014) RES3DMODx64 ver. 3.04: 3‐D resistivity and IP forward modeling using the finite‐difference and finite‐element methods [RES3DMODx64 ver. 3.11.03.]. Penang: Geotomosoft Solutions. https://www.geotomosoft.com/downloads.php
14. Loke, M.H. (2016) RES2DMOD ver. 3.03: rapid 2D resistivity and I.P. forward modeling using the finite‐difference and finite‐element methods. Houston: Geotomosoft Solutions.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Loke, M.H. (2022) Tutorial: 2‐D and 3‐D electrical imaging surveys. Loke, M.H. (Ed.) Copyright (1996–2022). Penang, Malaysia: Geotomo Software.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Mirgalikyzy, T., Mukanova, B. & Modin, I. (2015) Method of Integral Equations for the Problem of Electrical Tomography in a Medium with Ground Surface Relief. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2015, 1–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/207021
    [Google Scholar]
17. Mukanova, B. & Modin, I. (2017) The boundary element method in geophysical survey. Berlin: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Mukanova, B. & Orunkhanov, M. (2010) Inverse resistivity problem: geoelectric uncertainty principle and numerical reconstruction method. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 80(10), 2091–2108.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Mukanova, B., Mirgalikyzy, T. & Rakisheva, D. (2017) Modelling the influence of ground surface relief on electric sounding curves using the integral equations method. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2017(1), 9079475. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9079475
    [Google Scholar]
20. Mukanova, B., Modin, I., Mirgalikyzy, T. & Baranchuk, K. (2017) Modelling the influence of ground surface relief on electrical sounding curves and 2D inversion results. In: 23rd European meeting of environmental and engineering geophysics, September 2017. Malmo, Sweden: European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers. Vol. 2017, pp. 1–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214‐4609.201702120
21. Nwokebuihe, S.C., Alotaibi, A.M., Elkrry, A., Torgashov, E.V. & Anderson, N.L. (2017) Dam seepage investigation of an earthfill dam in Warren County, Missouri using geophysical methods. AIMS Geosciences, 3(1), 1–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2017.1.1
    [Google Scholar]
22. Pidlisecky, A. & Knight, R. (2008) FW2_5D: a MATLAB 2.5‐D electrical resistivity modeling code. Computers & Geosciences, 34(12), 1645–1654. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.04.001
    [Google Scholar]
23. Pidlisecky, A., Haber, E. & Knight, R. (2007) RESINVM3D: a 3D resistivity inversion package. Geophysics, 72(2), H1–H10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2402499
    [Google Scholar]
24. Rakisheva, D.S., Mukanova, B.G. & Modin, I.N. (2020) Simulation of electrical monitoring of dams with leakage with a transverse placement of the measuring installation. Eurasian Journal of Mathematical and Computer Applications, 8(4), 69–82. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32523/2306‐6172‐2020‐8‐4‐69‐82
    [Google Scholar]
25. Rücker, C., Günther, T. & Spitzer, K. (2006) Three‐dimensional modeling and inversion of DC resistivity data incorporating topography—I. Geophysical Journal International, 166(2), 495–505. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365‐246X.2006.03010.x
    [Google Scholar]
26. Sjödahl, P., Dahlin, T. & Zhou, B. (2006) 2.5D resistivity modeling of embankment dams to assess influence from geometry and material properties. Geophysics, 71(3), G107–G114.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Tresoldi, G., Hojat, A. & Zanzi, L. (2018) Correcting the influence of 3d geometry to process 2d ERT monitoring data of river embankments at the laboratory scale. In: 37° Convegno Gruppo Nazionale di Geofisica della Terra Solida. Bologna, Italy: National Institute of Oceanography and Experimental Geophysics ‐ OGS, pp. 690–694.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Turarova, M., Mirgalikyzy, T., Mukanova, B., Modin, I. & Kaznacheev, P. (2022a) Evaluation of the 3D topographic effect of homogeneous and inhomogeneous media on the results of 2D inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data. Modeling and Simulation in Engineering, Article ID 5196686 2022(1), 1–17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5196686
    [Google Scholar]
29. Turarova, M.K., Mirgalikyzy, T., Mukanova, B.G. & Modin, I.N. (2022b) Elimination the ground surface topographic effect in the 2D inversion results of electrical resistivity tomography data. Eurasian Journal of Mathematical and Computer Applications, 10(3), 84–104.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Vladimirov, V.S. (1971) Equations of mathematical physics. NewYork: Marcel Dekker Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Witten, A. (2002) Geophysica: MATLAB‐based software for the simulation, display, and processing of near‐surface geophysical data. Computers & Geosciences, 28(6), 751–762.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Xu, S.‐Z. (2001) The boundary element method in geophysics. Geophysical monograph series. University Park, IL: SEG Books.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Zhdanov, M. & Michael, S. (2015) Inverse Theory and Applications in Geophysics, Second Edition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.