1887
Volume 73, Issue 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Abstract

Least‐squares reverse time migration is an increasingly popular technique for subsurface imaging, especially in the presence of complex geological structures. However, elastic least‐squares reverse time migration algorithms face significant practical and numerical challenges when migrating multi‐component seismic data acquired from irregular topography. Many associated issues can be avoided by abandoning the Cartesian coordinate system and migrating the data to a generalized topographic coordinate system conformal to surface topology. We introduce a generalized anisotropic elastic least‐squares reverse time migration methodology that uses the numerical solutions of tensorial elastodynamics for propagating wavefields in computational domains influenced by free‐surface topography. We define a coordinate mapping assuming unstretched vertically translated meshes that transform an irregular physical domain to a regular computational domain on which calculating numerical elastodynamics solutions is straightforward. This allows us to obtain numerical solutions of forward and adjoint elastodynamics and generate subsurface images directly in topographic coordinates using a tensorial energy‐norm imaging condition. Numerical examples demonstrate that the proposed generalized elastic least‐squares reverse time migration algorithm is suitable for generating high‐quality images with reduced artefacts and better balanced reflectivity that can accurately explain observed data acquired from topography in a medium characterized by arbitrary heterogeneity and anisotropy. Finally, the computational cost of our method is comparable to that of an equivalent Cartesian elastic least‐squares reverse time migration numerical implementation.

© 2025 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. © 2024 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13619
2025-01-26
2025-11-16

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13619
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arias, C., Abreo, D., Abreo, S.A., Duque, L. & Ramírez, A.B. (2018) Full waveform inversion in generalized coordinates for zones of curved topography. CT&F‐Ciencia, Tecnología y Futuro, 8(2), 83–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Berryhill, J.R. (1979) Wave‐equation datuming. Geophysics, 44(8), 1329–1344.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Brillouin, L. (1964) Tensors in mechanics and elasticity. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, K. & Sacchi, M.D. (2017) Elastic least‐squares reverse time migration via linearized elastic full‐waveform inversion with pseudo‐Hessian preconditioning. Geophysics, 82(5), S341–S358.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Claerbout, J.F. (1992) Earth soundings analysis: Processing versus inversion, volume 6. London: Blackwell Scientific.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Dai, W. & Schuster, G.T. (2013) Plane‐wave least‐squares reverse‐time migration. Geophysics, 78(4), S165–S177.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Duan, Y., Guitton, A. & Sava, P. (2017) Elastic least‐squares reverse time migration. Geophysics, 82(4), S315–S325.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Duveneck, E. & Bakker, P.M. (2011) Stable P‐wave modeling for reverse‐time migration in tilted TI media. Geophysics, 76(2), S65–S75.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Fornberg, B. (1988) The pseudospectral method: accurate representation of interfaces in elastic wave calculations. Geophysics, 53(5), 625–637.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Gray, S.H. (2005) Gaussian beam migration of common‐shot records. Geophysics, 70(4), S71–S77.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Gray, S.H. & Marfurt, K.J. (1995) Migration from topography: improving the near‐surface image. Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics, 31(1‐2), 18–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Hestenes, M.R. & Stiefel, E. (1952) Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linearsystems. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, 49(6), 409–436.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Hestholm, S. (1999) Three‐dimensional finite difference viscoelastic wave modelling including surface topography. Geophysical Journal International, 139(3), 852–878.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Hestholm, S. (2019) Elastic tilted orthorhombic (and simpler) wave modeling including free‐surface topography. Geophysics, 84(2), T93–T108.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Hestholm, S., Moran, M., Ketcham, S., Anderson, T., Dillen, M. & McMechan, G. (2006) Effects of free‐surface topography on moving‐seismic‐source modeling. Geophysics, 71(6), T159–T166.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Jäger, C., Hertweck, T. & Spinner, M. (2003) True‐amplitude Kirchhoff migration from topography. In: SEG Technical program expanded abstracts 2003. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 909–912.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Komatitsch, D., Coutel, F. & Mora, P. (1996) Tensorial formulation of the wave equation for modelling curved interfaces. Geophysical Journal International, 127(1), 156–168.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Konuk, T. (2022) Tensorial elastodynamics and acoustodynamics for generalized seismic migration and inversion applications. Ph.D. thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO.
  19. Konuk, T. & Shragge, J. (2019) 3D tensorial elastodynamics for anisotropic media. In: SEG Technical program expanded abstracts 2019. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 3934–3938.
  20. Konuk, T. & Shragge, J. (2021) Tensorial elastodynamics for anisotropic media. Geophysics, 86(4), T293–T303.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Lan, H., Zhang, Z., Chen, J. & Liu, Y. (2014) Reverse time migration from irregular surface by flattening surface topography. Tectonophysics, 627, 26–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Ma, Y., Wang, S. & Sun, C. (2006) High resolution migration from topography: Experience with a mountainous area in China. In: SEG Technical program expanded abstracts 2006 . Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 646–650.
  23. McConnell, A.J. (2014) Applications of tensor analysis. North Chelmsford, MA: Courier Corporation.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. McMechan, G.A. & Chen, H. (1990) Implicit static corrections in prestack migration of common‐source data. Geophysics, 55(6), 757–760.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Mi, Y. & Margrave, G.F. (2001) Prestack depth imaging from topography with a Fourier method. In: SEG Technical program expanded abstracts 2001. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 1045–1048.
  26. Nuber, A., Manukyan, E. & Maurer, H. (2016) Ground topography effects on near‐surface elastic full waveform inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 207(1), 67–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Qu, Y., Guan, Z. & Li, Z. (2019) Topographic elastic least‐squares reverse time migration based on vector P‐and S‐wave equations in the curvilinear coordinates. Geophysical Prospecting, 67(5), 1271–1295.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Qu, Y. & Li, J. (2019) Q‐compensated reverse time migration in viscoacoustic media including surface topography. Geophysics, 84(4), S201–S217.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Rajasekaran, S. & McMechan, G.A. (1995) Prestack processing of land data with complex topography. Geophysics, 60(6), 1875–1886.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Ren, Z., Liu, Y. & Sen, M.K. (2017) Least‐squares reverse time migration in elastic media. Geophysical Journal International, 208(2), 1103–1125.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Rocha, D. & Sava, P. (2018) Elastic least‐squares reverse time migration using the energy norm. Geophysics, 83(3), S237–S248.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Rocha, D., Tanushev, N. & Sava, P. (2015) Elastic wavefield imaging using the energy norm. In: SEG Technical program expanded abstracts 2015. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 2124–2128.
  33. Scales, J.A. (1987) Tomographic inversion via the conjugate gradient method. Geophysics, 52(2), 179–185.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Schafer, R. (1996) An Introduction to nonassociative algebras. New York: Dover.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Shragge, J. (2014) Reverse time migration from topography. Geophysics, 79(4), S141–S152.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Shragge, J. (2017) Tensorial elastodynamics for isotropic media on vertically deformed meshes. In: SEG Technical program expanded abstracts 2017. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 4034–4038.
  37. Shragge, J. & Konuk, T. (2020) Tensorial elastodynamics for isotropic media. Geophysics, 85(6), T359–T373.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Smithyman, B.R. & Clowes, R.M. (2012) Waveform tomography of field vibroseis data using an approximate 2D geometry leads to improved velocity models. Geophysics, 77(1), R33–R43.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Tarantola, A. (1988) Theoretical background for the inversion of seismic waveforms, including elasticity and attenuation. In: Scattering and attenuations of seismic waves, part I. Berlin: Springer, pp. 365–399.
  40. Tromp, J., Tape, C. & Liu, Q. (2005) Seismic tomography, adjoint methods, time reversal and banana‐doughnut kernels. Geophysical Journal International, 160(1), 195–216.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Wiggins, J. (1984) Kirchhoff integral extrapolation and migration of nonplanar data. Geophysics, 49(8), 1239–1248.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Wong, M., Ronen, S. & Biondi, B. (2011) Least‐squares reverse time migration/inversion for ocean bottom data: A case study. In: SEG Technical program expanded abstracts 2011. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 2369–2373.
  43. Yan, J. & Sava, P. (2007) Elastic wavefield imaging with scalar and vector potentials. In: SEG Technical program expanded abstracts 2007. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 2150–2154.
  44. Yao, G. & Jakubowicz, H. (2016) Least‐squares reverse‐time migration in a matrix‐based formulation. Geophysical Prospecting, 64(3), 611–621.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Yue, Y.B., Li, Z.C., Zhang, P., Zhou, X.F. & Qin, N. (2010) Prestack Gaussian beam depth migration under complex surface conditions. Applied Geophysics, 7(2), 143–148.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang, Y., Duan, L. & Xie, Y. (2015) A stable and practical implementation of least‐squares reverse time migration. Geophysics, 80(1), V23–V31.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang, Z., Tian, L., Zhou, D. & Wu, K. (2011) Application of Gaussian beam migration in imaging of the steep complex structure in Tan‐Lu strike‐slip fault zone of Bohai Sea in China. In: SEG Technical program expanded abstracts 2011. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 3435–3439.
  48. Zhao, Z., Chen, J., Bao, Y. & Wang, M. (2019) Topography‐dependent frequency‐domain prestack reverse time migration. In: SEG Technical program expanded abstracts 2019. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 4380–4384.
  49. Zhu, H., Luo, Y., Nissen‐Meyer, T., Morency, C. & Tromp, J. (2009) Elastic imaging and time‐lapse migration based on adjoint methods. Geophysics, 74, WCA167–WCA177.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13619
Loading
Elastic least‐squares reverse time migration from topography through anisotropic tensorial elastodynamics
Geophysical Prospecting 73, 650 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.13619
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13619
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13619
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): acoustics; anisotropy; elastics; inverse problem; inversion; seismics

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error