1887
Volume 73, Issue 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Abstract

A thermoacoustics imaging system is investigated in this paper to enhance conventional imaging modalities in geological subsurface situational awareness applications. While thermoacoustics imaging has traditionally been used in biological scenarios like breast cancer detection, this work aims to extend thermoacoustics imaging to geophysical applications by demonstrating that water‐saturated sand can be distinguished from dry and oil‐saturated sand based on their amplitude differences. This breakthrough enables the feasibility of monitoring water distribution in these media. Moreover, to compensate for the low conversion efficiency from electromagnetic power to thermoacoustics amplitude, the signal modulation method is used by applying the frequency‐modulated continuous wave techniques. The experiment results show that the frequency‐modulated continuous wave can enhance the signal‐to‐noise ratio while maintaining a similar resolution as the pulse‐excited thermoacoustics wave. These findings pave the way for the future use of thermoacousticsimaging in subsurface sensing and imaging of fluid flow and transport in porous media.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13663
2025-04-17
2026-02-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/gpr/73/4/gpr13663.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13663&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aliroteh, M., Nan, H. & Arbabian, A. (2016) Microwave‐induced thermoacoustic tomography for subcutaneous vascular imaging. In 2016 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) . Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2016.7728643.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aliroteh, M.S. & Arbabian, A. (2017) Microwave‐induced thermoacoustic imaging of subcutaneous vasculature with near‐field RF excitation. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 66, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2017.2714664.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alvarez, Y., Rodriguez‐Vaqueiro, Y., Gonzalez‐Valdes, B., Rappaport, C.M., Las‐Heras, F. & Martínez‐Lorenzo, J.Á. (2015) Three‐dimensional compressed sensing‐based millimeter‐wave imaging. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 63, 5868–5873. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2015.2481487.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bal, G., Ren, K., Uhlmann, G. & Zhou, T. (2011) Quantitative thermo‐acoustics and related problems. Inverse Problems, 27, 055007. https://doi.org/10.1088/0266‐5611/27/5/055007.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauer, D.R., Wang, X., Vollin, J., Xin, H. & Witte, R.S. (2011) Thermoacoustic imaging and spectroscopy for enhanced breast cancer detection. In 2011 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium . Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, pp. 2364–2367. https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2011.0587.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bauer, D.R., Wang, X., Vollin, J., Xin, H. & Witte, R.S. (2012) Spectroscopic thermoacoustic imaging of water and fat composition. Applied Physics Letters, 101, 033705. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4737414.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bayıntır, H., Elmas, D., İdemen, M., Uzun, B. & Karaman, M. (2017) Thermoacoustic image reconstruction based on layered tissue model. In Medical imaging 2017: Ultrasonic imaging and tomography, volume 10139. Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp. 101391I. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2250143.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ben‐Hadj‐Ali, H., Operto, S. & Virieux, J. (2008) Velocity model building by 3D frequency‐domain, full‐waveform inversion of wide‐aperture seismic data. Geophysics, 73, VE101–VE117. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2957948.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Berg, S., Ott, H., Klapp, S.A., Schwing, A., Neiteler, R., Brussee, N., et al. (2013) Real‐time 3D imaging of Haines jumps in porous media flow. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 3755–3759. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221373110.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Boyle, K.C., Nan, H., Khuri‐Yakub, B.T. & Arbabian, A. (2016) Noncontact thermoacoustic detection of targets embedded in dispersive media. In Electro‐optical remote sensing X, volume 9988 . Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp. 99880H. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2241941.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Callow, B., Falcon‐Suarez, I., Ahmed, S. & Matter, J. (2018) Assessing the carbon sequestration potential of basalt using x‐ray micro‐CT and rock mechanics. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 70, 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.12.008.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cui, Y., Yuan, C. & Ji, Z. (2017) A review of microwave‐induced thermoacoustic imaging: excitation source, data acquisition system and biomedical applications. Journal of Innovative Optical Health Sciences, 10, 1730007. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793545817300075.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. David, C., Barnes, C., Desrues, M., Pimienta, L., Sarout, J. & Dautriat, J. (2017) Ultrasonic monitoring of spontaneous imbibition experiments: Acoustic signature of fluid migration. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 122, 4931–4947. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jb013804.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. David, C., Bertauld, D., Dautriat, J., Sarout, J., Menéndez, B. & Nabawy, B. (2015) Detection of moving capillary front in porous rocks using x‐ray and ultrasonic methods. Frontiers in Physics, 3, 53. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2015.00053.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. DiCarlo, D.A., Bauters, T.W., Darnault, C.J., Wong, E., Bierck, B.R., Steenhuis, T.S. & Parlange, J.‐Y. (2000) Surfactant‐induced changes in gravity fingering of water through a light oil. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 41, 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169‐7722(99)00078‐9.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Doyen, P. (2007) Seismic reservoir characterization: An earth modelling perspective, volume 2. Houten: EAGE. https://doi.org/10.3997/9789462820234.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fan, L., Gao, J., Wu, Z., Yang, S. & Ma, G. (2018) An investigation of thermal effects on micro‐properties of granite by x‐ray CT technique. Applied Thermal Engineering, 140, 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.05.074.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ghanbarzadeh‐Dagheyan, A., Liu, C., Molaei, A., Heredia, J. & Martinez Lorenzo, J. (2018) Holey‐cavity‐based compressive sensing for ultrasound imaging. Sensors, 18, 1674. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061674.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Haynes, M., Stang, J. & Moghaddam, M. (2012) Microwave breast imaging system prototype with integrated numerical characterization. International Journal of Biomedical Imaging, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/706365.
  20. He, Y., Liu, C., Lin, L. & Wang, L.V. (2017) Comparative effects of linearly and circularly polarized illumination on microwave‐induced thermoacoustic tomography. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 16, 1593–1596. https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2017.2652853.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Heredia‐Juesas, J., Molaei, A., Tirado, L., Blackwell, W. & Martinez‐Lorenzo, J.A. (2017) Norm‐1 regularized consensus‐based ADMM for imaging with a compressive antenna. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 16, 2362–2365. https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2017.2718242.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kruger, R.A., Kiser Jr, W.L., Reinecke, D.R. & Kruger, G.A. (2003) Thermoacoustic computed tomography using a conventional linear transducer array. Medical physics, 30, 856–860. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1565340.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ku, G. & Wang, L.V. (2001) Scanning microwave‐induced thermoacoustic tomography: signal, resolution, and contrast. Medical Physics, 28, 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1333409.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lazebnik, M., Popovic, D., McCartney, L., Watkins, C.B., Lindstrom, M.J., Harter, J. et al. (2007) A large‐scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal, benign and malignant breast tissues obtained from cancer surgeries. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 52, 6093. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031‐9155/52/20/002.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Liang, S., Lashkari, B., Choi, S.S.S., Ntziachristos, V. & Mandelis, A. (2018) The application of frequency‐domain photoacoustics to temperature‐dependent measurements of the Grüneisen parameter in lipids. Photoacoustics, 11, 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2018.07.005.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu, C., Dagheyan, A.G., Heredia‐Juesas, J., Molaei, A. & Martinez‐Lorenzo, J.A. (2018a) Microwave‐induced thermoacoustic imaging using compressive sensing and a Holey cavity. In 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting . Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, pp. 1799–1800. https://doi.org/10.1109/APUSNCURSINRSM.2018.8609447.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu, C., Ghanbarzadeh‐Dagheyan, A., Heredia‐Juesas, J., Molaei, A. & Martinez Lorenzo, J. (2018b) The study of Holey cavity in the application of thermoacoustics imaging. In ASME's International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Volume 11: Acoustics, Vibration, and Phononics. Pittsburgh, PA. New York: ASME, pp. V011T01A025. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2018‐87757.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu, C., Ghanbarzadeh‐Dagheyan, A., Heredia‐Juesas, J., Molaei, A. & Martinez‐Lorenzo, J.A. (2018c) The study of Holey cavity in the application of thermoacoustics imaging. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, volume 52163. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. V011T01A025. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2018‐87757.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu, C., Mao, X., Heredia Juesas, J., Molaei, A. & Martinez‐Lorenzo, J.A. (2019) Preliminary results of microwave induced thermoacoustics imaging in geological media. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, volume 59483. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. V011T01A017. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2019‐11943.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu, C., Mao, X., Wang, C., Liyanage, R., Heredia Juesas, J., Juanes, R. & Martinez‐Lorenzo, J.A. (2023) Monitoring preferential flow of water in sand using thermoacoustics wave imaging. Geophysical Research Letters, 50, e2023GL105248. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023gl105248.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu, S., Nan, H., Dolatsha, N. & Arbabian, A. (2016) Extracting dielectric spectroscopic properties from microwave‐induced thermoacoustic signals. In 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, pp. 3618–3621. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591511.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Liyanage, R., Crawshaw, J., Krevor, S. & Pini, R. (2017) Multidimensional imaging of density driven convection in a porous medium. Energy Procedia, 114, 4981–4985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1641.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lou, C., Yang, S., Ji, Z., Chen, Q. & Xing, D. (2012) Ultrashort microwave‐induced thermoacoustic imaging: a breakthrough in excitation efficiency and spatial resolution. Physical Review Letters, 109, 218101. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.112.119904.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mao, X., Liu, C., Heredia‐Juesas, J. & Martinez‐Lorenzo, J.A. (2020) Microwave‐induced thermoacoustic compressive imaging with metamaterial coding. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, volume 84478. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. V001T01A018. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2020‐24607.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Martinez‐Lorenzo, J.A., Gonzalez‐Valdes, B., Rappaport, C., Meana, J.G. & Pino, A.G. (2011) Reconstructing distortions on reflector antennas with the iterative‐field‐matrix method using near‐field observation data. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 59, 2434–2437. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2011.2144552.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Martinez‐Lorenzo, J.A., Quivira, F. & Rappaport, C. (2012) Sar imaging of suicide bombers wearing concealed explosive threats. Progress in Electromagnetics Research, 125, 255–272. https://doi.org/10.2528/PIER11120518.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Müller, S., Niederleithinger, E. & Bohlen, T. (2012) Reverse time migration: a seismic imaging technique applied to synthetic ultrasonic data. International Journal of Geophysics, 2012, 128465. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/128465.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Nan, H. & Arbabian, A. (2014) Coherent frequency‐domain microwave‐induced thermoacoustic imaging. In 2014 IEEE MTT‐S International Microwave Symposium (IMS2014). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSYM.2014.6848489.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Nan, H. & Arbabian, A. (2017) Peak‐power‐limited frequency‐domain microwave‐induced thermoacoustic imaging for handheld diagnostic and screening tools. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 65, 2607–2616. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2016.2637909.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Nie, L., Ou, Z., Yang, S. & Xing, D. (2010) Thermoacoustic molecular tomography with magnetic nanoparticle contrast agents for targeted tumor detection. Medical Physics, 37, 4193–4200. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3466696.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Pohlmeier, A., Garré, S. & Roose, T. (2018) Noninvasive imaging of processes in natural porous media: from pore to field scale. Vadose Zone Journal, 17, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2018.03.0044.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Roman, S., Soulaine, C. & Kovscek, A.R. (2019) Pore‐scale visualization and characterization of viscous dissipation in porous media. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 558, 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.09.072.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Singhvi, A., Fitzpatrick, A. & Arbabian, A. (2020) Resolution enhanced non‐contact thermoacoustic imaging using coded pulse excitation. In 2020 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/IUS46767.2020.9251350.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Taruttis, A. & Ntziachristos, V. (2015) Advances in real‐time multispectral optoacoustic imaging and its applications. Nature Photonics, 9, 219. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.29.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Upputuri, P.K., Das, D., Maheshwari, M., Yaowen, Y. & Pramanik, M. (2020) Real‐time monitoring of temperature using a pulsed laser‐diode‐based photoacoustic system. Optics Letters, 45, 718–721. https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.386173.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang, X., Bauer, D.R., Witte, R. & Xin, H. (2012) Microwave‐induced thermoacoustic imaging model for potential breast cancer detection. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 59, 2782–2791. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2012.2210218.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Werth, C.J., Zhang, C., Brusseau, M.L., Oostrom, M. & Baumann, T. (2010) A review of non‐invasive imaging methods and applications in contaminant hydrogeology research. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 113, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2010.01.001.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Wildenschild, D., Vaz, C., Rivers, M., Rikard, D. & Christensen, B. (2002) Using x‐ray computed tomography in hydrology: systems, resolutions, and limitations. Journal of Hydrology, 267, 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022‐1694(02)00157‐9.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Xu, M. & Wang, L.V. (2006). Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine. Review of Scientific Instruments, 77, 041101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2195024.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Xu, Y. & Wang, L.V. (2006). Rhesus monkey brain imaging through intact skull with thermoacoustic tomography. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 53, 542–548. https://doi.org/10.1109/tuffc.2006.1610562.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Yao, L., Guo, G. & Jiang, H. (2010) Quantitative microwave‐induced thermoacoustic tomography. Medical Physics, 37, 3752–3759. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3456926.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Yin, B., Xing, D., Wang, Y., Zeng, Y., Tan, Y. & Chen, Q. (2004) Fast photoacoustic imaging system based on 320‐element linear transducer array. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 49, 1339. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031‐9155/49/7/019.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhao, B., MacMinn, C.W., Primkulov, B.K., Chen, Y., Valocchi, A.J., Zhao, J. et al. (2019) Comprehensive comparison of pore‐scale models for multiphase flow in porous media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116, 13799–13806. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1901619116.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Zou, X., Song, H., Wang, C. & Ma, Z. (2016) Relationships between b‐mode ultrasound imaging signals and suspended sediment concentrations. Measurement, 92, 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.05.083.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13663
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13663
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): acoustics; electromagnetics; imaging; signal processing

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error