oa On signal contribution functions and sensitivity for frequency‐domain electromagnetic and direct current electrical resistivity methods

References

1. Barker, R. (1979) Signal contribution sections and their use in resistivity studies. Geophysical Journal International, 59(1), 123–129.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Butler, S.L. & Sinha, G. (2012) Forward modeling of applied geophysics methods using Comsol and comparison with analytical and laboratory analog models. Computers & Geosciences, 42, 168–176.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Butler, S.L. & Zhang, Z. (2016) Forward modeling of geophysical electromagnetic methods using Comsol. Computers & Geosciences, 87, 1–10.
   [Google Scholar]
4. COMSOL . (2015) Comsol multiphysics user guide (version 5.2). COMSOL, AB, 5–437.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Esparza, F.J. & Gómez‐Trevino, E. (1997) 1‐D inversion of resistivity and induced polarization data for the least number of layers. Geophysics, 62(6), 1724–1729.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Geselowitz, D.B. (1971) An application of electrocardiographic lead theory to impedance plethysmography. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 18(1), 38–41.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Gomez‐Trevino, E. & Flores, C. (2015) Alternative theory for signal contribution sections and depth of investigation characteristics in electrical prospecting. Geophysical Prospecting, 63(3), 740–749.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Guerreiro, S.C. (1983) Comment on “A theorem for direct current regimes and some of its consequences” by A. Roy and some related papers and comments. Geophysical Prospecting, 31(1), 192–195.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Guptasarma, D. (1981) Comments on “A theorem for direct current regimes and some of its consequences and some related papers.” Geophysical Prospecting, 29(2), 308–311.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hördt, A. (1998) Calculation of electromagnetic sensitivities in the time domain. Geophysical Journal International, 133(3), 713–720.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Huang, H. & Won, I. (2001) Conductivity and susceptibility mapping using broadband electromagnetic sensors. In Symposium on the application of geophysics to engineering and environmental problems 2001. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. EEM3–EEM3.
12. Landau, L.D. & Lifshitz, E.M. (2013) Mechanics and electrodynamics. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
13. McGillivray, P., Oldenburg, D., Ellis, R. & Habashy, T. (1994) Calculation of sensitivities for the frequency‐domain electromagnetic problem. Geophysical Journal International, 116(1), 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Menke, W. (2018) Geophysical data analysis: Discrete inverse theory. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Parasnis, D. (1984) A theorem for dc regimes and some of its consequences ‐ comments. Geophysical Prospecting, 32(1), 139–141.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Parasnis, D. (1988) Reciprocity theorems in geoelectric and geoelectromagnetic work. Geoexploration, 25(3), 177–198.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Park, S.K. & Van, G.P. (1991) Inversion of pole‐pole data for 3‐D resistivity structure beneath arrays of electrodes. Geophysics, 56(7), 951–960.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Reynolds, J.M. (2011) An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Roy, A. (1978) Theorem for direct‐current regimes and some of its consequences. Geophysical Prospecting, 26(2), 442–463.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Roy, A. & Apparao, A. (1971) Depth of investigation in direct current methods. Geophysics, 36(5), 943–959.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Seigel, H.O. (1959) Mathematical formulation and type curves for induced polarization. Geophysics, 24(3), 547–565.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Telford, W.M., Geldart, L.P. & Sheriff, R.E. (1990) Applied geophysics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Tølbøll, R.J. & Christensen, N.B. (2007) Sensitivity functions of frequency‐domain magnetic dipole‐dipole systems. Geophysics, 72(2), F45–F56.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Wang, B., Liu, J., Hu, X., Liu, J., Guo, Z. & Xiao, J. (2021) Geophysical electromagnetic modeling and evaluation: A review. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 194, 104438.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Ward, S.H. & Hohmann, G.W. (1987) Electromagnetic theory for geophysical applications. In: Nabighian, M.N. (Ed.) Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, vol. 1, Society of Exploration Geophysicists. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560802631.ch4.
    [Google Scholar]