1887
Volume 73, Issue 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Abstract

We have developed two inversion schemes for probabilistic calculation of density ratio across a reflecting interface from P‐to‐P wave reflectivity by algebraically inverting Zoeppritz's equation. The density ratio is an attribute that can be directly linked to hydrocarbon saturation. The probabilistic approach helps to model uncertainties in the calculated parameter. The methods are free of empiricism. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we show that ultra‐far amplitude variation with offset (AVO) data are not required for the inversion of the density ratio parameter. As a matter of fact, with our schemes, it is advisable to restrict the inversion to near‐far angle ranges to minimize the impact of the amplitude‐distorting phenomena that (strongly) invalidate the assumptions woven into the derivation of the P‐to‐P Zoeppritz equation. Moreover, we demonstrate that this equation is suitable for density ratio inversion. The first inversion scheme to predict the density ratio involves repeatedly solving a 12th‐degree polynomial equation across various incident angles. The most frequent value in the distribution of solutions serves as the best estimate. The second scheme solves a 5th‐degree polynomial equation for the squared / ratio of layer 2 (in a two‐layered earth model), also at an arbitrary number of incident angles. The range of the angles used in the inversion can, in principle, be freely selected. The most likely density ratio estimate is obtained as a byproduct of the calculation. We tested the methods on a synthetic example. Both schemes predict the density ratio within one standard deviation of the actual value from near‐far angle seismic reflection data. Moreover, the two inversion schemes were compared, showing that , which requires repetitive solving of 12th‐degree polynomial equations, is computationally more expensive than , which solves a 5th‐degree polynomial equation. Despite both methods achieving accurate density ratio estimates, ’s computational efficiency makes it the preferred choice for large datasets. This paper is the first part of a two‐part study on density ratio inversion methods. Here, we focus on the theoretical foundations of the and inversion approaches and validate them through synthetic tests. In Part 2, we extend this work by applying the methods to real seismic data and evaluating their performance in a practical exploration setting.

© 2025 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. © 2025 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70029
2025-07-08
2026-02-07

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70029
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aki, K. & Richards, P.G. (1980) Quantitative seismology: theory and methods, vol. 1. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co. San Francisco.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alhussain, M., Gurevich, B. & Urošević, M. (2008) Experimental verification of spherical‐wave effect on the AVO response and implications for three‐term inversion. Geophysics, 73(2), C7–C12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2837641
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Aurentz, J.L., Mach, T., Robol, L., Vandebril, R. & Watkins, D.S. (2016) Fast and backward stable computation of roots of polynomials, part II: backward error analysis; companion matrix and companion pencil. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 37(3), 903–926. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1611.02435
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bortfeld, R. (1961) Approximation to the reflection coefficients of plane longitudinal and transverse waves. Geophysical Prospecting, 9(4), 485–502, Available from: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365‐2478.1961.tb01670.x
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Botev, Z.I., Grotowski, J.F., & Kroese, D.P. (2010) Kernel density estimation via diffusion. Annals of Statistics, 38(5), 2916–2957, Available from: http://doi.org/10.1214/10‐AOS799
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Buland, A. & Omre, H. (2003) Bayesian linearized AVO inversion. Geophysics, 68(1), 185–198. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1543206
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Cambois, G. (2001) AVO processing: myths and reality. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 71st Annual International Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Houston: SEG, 189–192 Available from: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1816505
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Castagna, J.P., & Backus, M.M. (1993) Offset dependent reflectivity: theory and practice of AVO analysis, investigations in geophysics No. 8. Society of Exploration Geophysicists. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560802624
  9. Chen, T. & Wei, X. (2009) Joint PP and PS AVO inversion based on Zoeppritz equations, Presented at the 2009 CSPG CSEG CWLS convention, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Available from: https://geoconvention.com/wp-content/uploads/abstracts/2009/075.pdf
  10. Chen, T. & Wei, X. (2012) Zoeppritz‐based joint AVO inversion of PP and PS waves in Ray parameter domain. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2012, 1–5. Society of Exploration Geophysicists. Houston: SEG. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2012‐1006.1
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Chopra, S. & Castagna, J.P. (2014) AVO, investigations in geophysics no. 16. Society of Exploration Geophysicists. Available from: https://library.seg.org/doi/book/10.1190/1.9781560803201
  12. Connolly, P. (1999) Elastic impedance. The Leading Edge, 18(4), 438–452. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438307
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Červený, V. & Pšenčík, I. (2011) Seismic Ray theory. In: Gupta, H.K. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of solid earth geophysics. Encyclopedia of earth sciences series. Dordrecht: Springer, 1244–1258. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐90‐481‐8702‐7_53
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Downton, J.E. (2005) Seismic parameter estimation from AVO inversion. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Calgary.
  15. Fatti, J.L., Smith, G.C., Vail, P.J., Strauss, P.J., & Levitt, P.R. (1994) Detection of gas in sandstone reservoirs using AVO analysis: a 3‐D seismic case history using the geostack technique. Geophysics, 59(9), 1362–1376. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443695
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gardner, G.H.F., Gardner, L.W., & Gregory, A.R. (1974) Formation velocity and density: the diagnostic basics for stratigraphic traps. Geophysics, 39, 770–780.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Goodway, B. (2001) AVO and Lamé constants for rock parameterization and fluid detection. CSEG Recorder, 26(6), 39–60. Available from: http://209.91.124.56/publications/recorder/2001/06jun/jun01‐avo‐constants.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Goodway, B., Chen, T. & Downton, J. (1997) Improved AVO fluid detection and lithology discrimination using Lamé petrophysical parameters; “λρ”, “μρ”, & “λ/μ fluid stack” from P and S inversions. In: 67th Annual international meeting, SEG, expanded abstracts. Houston: SEG, pp. 183–186. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1190/1.1885795
  19. Gray, D., Goodway, B. & Chen, T. (1999) Bridging the gap: using AVO to detect changes in fundamental elastic constants. In: 69th Annual international meeting, SEG, expanded abstracts. Houston: SEG, pp. 852–855. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1190/1.1821163
  20. Haase, A.B. (2004) Spherical wave AVO modeling of converted waves in isotropic media. In: 74th Annual international meeting, SEG, expanded abstracts. Houston: SEG, pp. 263–266.
  21. Hampson, D.P., Russell, B.H., & Bankhead, B. (2005) Simultaneous inversion of pre‐stack seismic data, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts. Houston: SEG.
  22. Hilterman, F. J. (1983) Seismic lithology. (unpublished course notes).
  23. Hilterman, F. (1990) Is AVO the seismic signature of lithology? A case history of ship shoal–south addition. The Leading Edge, 9(6), 15–22. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1190/1.1439744
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Ioakimidis, N.I. & Papadakis, K.E. (1985) Analytical solution of the Lagrange quintic solution in the three‐body problem in celestial mechanics. Acta Mechanica, 55(3), 267–272. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01175807
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kabir, N., Crider, R., Ramkhelawan, R. & Baynes, C. (2006) Can hydrocarbon saturation be estimated using density contrast parameter?Canadian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 31(6), 31–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Knott, C.G. (1899) Reflection and refraction of elastic waves with seismological applications. Philosophical Magazine, London, 48(64–97), 567–569.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Lehocki, I., Avseth, P. & Hadžiavdić, V. (2015), Probabilistic estimation of density and shear information from Zoeppritz's equation. The Leading Edge, 34(9), 1046–1047. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1190/tle34091036.1
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Lehocki, I., Avseth, P., Larson, F. & Manafov, R. (2018), Exploring Zoeppritz for more constrained and reliable density‐ratio estimation. In: 88th Annual international meeting, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018. Houston: SEG, 580–584. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2018‐2998598.1
  29. Lehocki, I., Mukerji, T., Avseth, P. & Jensen, E.H. (2025), Algorithms for extraction of reliable density information from prestack seismic data—Part 2 – Applications. Geophysical Prospecting, 1–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Li, S.J., Gao, J.H., Yong, X.S., & Li, H.L. (2013) AVO analysis of spherical reflected P waves. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 55(5), 598–606.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Lines, L.R. (1998) Density contrast is difficult to determine from AVO. CREWES Project Annual Research Report, 10, 47‐1 to 47‐8.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. McNamee, J. (1993) A bibliography on roots of polynomials. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 47, 391–394.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Richards, P.G. & Frasier, C.W. (1976) Scattering of elastic waves from depth‐dependent in homogeneities. Geophysics, 41(3), 441–458, Available from: http://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440625
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Rüger, A. (2002) Reflection coefficients and azimuthal AVO analysis in anisotropic media. Houston: Geophysical Monograph Series, SEG.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Sheriff, R.E., & Geldart, L.P. (1995) Exploration seismology, 2nd edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Shuey, R.T. (1985a) A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations. Geophysics, 50(4), 609–614, http://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441936
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Shuey, R.T. (1985b) A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations: editor's note. Geophysics, 50(9), 1522, http://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442022
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Smith, G.C., & Gidlow, P.M. (1987) Weighted stacking for rock property estimation and detection of gas. Geophysical Prospecting, 35(9), 993–1014. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365‐2478.1987.tb00856.x
     [Google Scholar]
  39. van der Baan, M. & Smit, D. (2006) amplitude analysis of isotropic P‐wave reflections. Geophysics, 71(6), C93–C103. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2335877
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Vashisth, D., Lessard, R. & Mukerji, T. (2025) Pre‐stack and post‐stack seismic inversion using quantum computing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.03808.
  41. Xu, Y. & Bancroft, J.C. (1998) AVO case study: extraction of Lamé’s parameters from vertical component seismic data. Geo‐Triad, 98, 350–351.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Wei, X., & Chen, T. (2011) Joint PP and PS AVO inversion based on Zoeppritz equations. Earthquake Science, 24(4), 329–334. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589‐011‐0795‐1
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Wiggins, R., Kenny, G.S., & McClure, C.D. (1983) A method for determining and displaying the shear‐velocity reflectivities of a geologic formation. European Patent Application, EP0113944A1.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Wright, J. (1986) Reflection coefficients at pore‐fluid contacts as a function of offset. Geophysics, 51, 1858–1860.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhu, X., & McMechan, G. (2012) AVO inversion using the Zoeppritz equation for PP reflections. SEG Technical Program Expanded. Abstracts 2012, 1‐5. Society of Exploration Geophysicists. Houston: SEG.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Zoeppritz, K.B. (1919) Über Reflexion und Durchgang seismischer Wellen durch Unstetigkeitsflächen. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch‐Physikalische Klasse, 1919, 66–84.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70029
Loading
Algorithms for extraction of reliable density ratios from pre‐stack seismic data—Part 1: Theory
Geophysical Prospecting 73, e70029 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.70029
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70029
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70029
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): density ratio inversion; Zoeppritz equation

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error