1887
Volume 73, Issue 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478
PDF

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Seismic characterization of carbonate reservoirs is a challenging task due to the complex structure of carbonate rocks, where the seismic response is affected by multiple factors such as pore volume and shape as well as changes in mineralogy due to dolomitization and silicification. Hence, the prediction of petrophysical properties from seismic data is often uncertain. For this reason, we propose a statistical inversion method for the estimation of rock properties, where we combine Bayesian inverse theory with geophysical modelling. The geophysical model aims to compute the seismic response based on the rock and fluid properties and pore structure of the carbonate rocks, and it includes rock physics and the amplitude variation with offset models for the seismic response. The Bayesian formulation allows for the solution of the associated inverse problem by computing the posterior distribution of rock and fluid properties and pore structure of the rocks conditioned by the measured geophysical data. The novelty of the proposed method is that the rock physics model can be any petroelastic relation, without requiring any linearization. For the application to the carbonate reservoir, we adopt the self‐consistent inclusion model with ellipsoidal pore shapes and Gassmann's equation for the fluid effect; however, the inversion can be applied to any rock physics model. The statistical model assumes that the prior probability distribution of the model variables is a Gaussian mixture model such that distinct petrophysical characteristics can be associated with geological or seismic facies. The result of the proposed inversion is the most likely reservoir model of rock and fluid and pore geometry parameters, for example, porosity, pore aspect ratio, and water saturation and the uncertainty of the model predictions. The method is demonstrated and validated on synthetic and real examples using well logs and two‐dimensional seismic sections from a pre‐salt dataset in Brazil.

© 2025 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. © 2025 The Author(s). Geophysical Prospecting published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70041
2025-07-09
2026-02-08

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70041
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/gpr/73/6/gpr70041.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70041&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aki, K., and P.Richards. 2002. Quantitative Seismology, University Science Books. https://books.google.com/books?id=sRhawFG5_EcC
  2. Avseth, P., T.Mukerji, and G.Mavko. 2005. Quantitative Seismic Interpretation: Applying Rock Physics Tools to Reduce Interpretation Risk, Cambridge University Press.
  3. Berryman, J. G.1980. “Long‐Wavelength Propagation in Composite Elastic Media I. Spherical Inclusions.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America68: 1809–1819.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Berryman, J. G.1981. “Elastic Wave Propagation in Fluid‐Saturated Porous Media.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America69: 416–424.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Berryman, J. G.1995. “Mixture Theories for Rock Properties.” Rock Physics and Phase Relations: A Handbook of Physical Constants3: 205–228.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bosch, M., T.Mukerji, and E. F.Gonzalez. 2010. “Seismic Inversion for Reservoir Properties Combining Statistical Rock Physics and Geostatistics: A Review.” Geophysics75: 75A165–75A176.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Budiansky, B.1965. “On the Elastic Moduli of Some Heterogeneous Materials.” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids13: 223–227. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022509665900116.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Buland, A., and H.Omre. 2003. “Bayesian Linearized AVO Inversion.” Geophysics68: 185–198.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Chinelatto, G. F., A. M. P.Belila, M.Basso, J. P. P.Souza, and A. C.Vidal. 2020. “A Taphofacies Interpretation of Shell Concentrations and Their Relationship With Petrophysics: A Case Study of Barremian‐Aptian Coquinas in the Itapema Formation, Santos Basin‐Brazil.” Marine and Petroleum Geology116: 104317. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264817220301008.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Eberli, G. P., G. T.Baechle, F. S.Anselmetti, and M. L.Incze. 2003. “Factors Controlling Elastic Properties in Carbonate Sediments and Rocks.” Geophysics22: 654–660. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:27946383.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Gassmann, F.1951. Über die Elastizität poröser MedienMitteilungen aus dem Institut für Geophysik an der Eidgenössischen Technischen Hochschule Zürich, Institut für Geophysik an der ETH. https://books.google.com/books?id=DseMZwEACAAJ.
  12. Gomes, J., R.Bunevich, L.Tedeschi, M.Tucker, and F.Whitaker. 2020. “Facies Classification and Patterns of Lacustrine Carbonate Deposition of the Barra Velha Formation, Santos Basin, Brazilian Pre‐Salt.” Marine and Petroleum Geology113: 104176. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264817219306300.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Grana, D.2022. “Bayesian Rock‐Physics Inversion with Kumaraswamy Prior Models.” Geophysics87: M87–M97.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Grana, D., T.Fjeldstad, and H.Omre. 2017. “Bayesian Gaussian Mixture Linear Inversion for Geophysical Inverse Problems.” Mathematical Geosciences49: 493–515.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Grana, D., X.Lang, and W.Wu. 2017. “Statistical Facies Classification From Multiple Seismic Attributes: Comparison Between Bayesian Classification and Expectation–Maximization Method and Application in Petrophysical Inversion.” Geophysical Prospecting65: 544–562.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Grana, D., T.Mukerji, and P.Doyen. 2021. Seismic Reservoir Modeling: Theory, Examples, and Algorithms. Wiley‐Blackwell.
  17. Grana, D., and E. D.Rossa. 2010. “Probabilistic Petrophysical‐Properties Estimation Integrating Statistical Rock Physics With Seismic Inversion.” Geophysics75: O21–O37.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Guo, Q., J.Ba, and C.Luo. 2022. “Nonlinear Petrophysical Amplitude Variation with Offset Inversion With Spatially Variable Pore Aspect Ratio.” Geophysics87: M111–M125.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Guo, Q., J.Ba, C.Luo, and M.Pang. 2021. “Seismic Rock Physics Inversion with Varying Pore Aspect Ratio in Tight Sandstone Reservoirs.” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering207: 109131. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920410521007865.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Guo, Q. G., J.Ba, and C.Luo. 2023. “Seismic Rock‐Physics Linearized Inversion for Reservoir‐Property and Pore‐Type Parameters With Application to Carbonate Reservoirs.” Geoenergy Science and Engineering224: 211640.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Hastie, T., R.Tibshirani, and J.Friedman. 2001. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and PredictionSpringer series in statistics. Springer. https://books.google.com/books?id=VRzITwgNV2UC.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Kuster, G. T., and M. N.Toksöz. 1974. “Velocity and Attenuation of SeismicC Waves in Two‐phase Media: Part I. Theoretical Formulations.” Geophysics39: 587–606. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440450.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Latimer, R. B., R.Davidson, and P.van Riel. 2000. “An Interpreter's Guide to Understanding and Working With Seismic‐Derived Acoustic Impedance Data.” The Leading Edge19: 242–256.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Lima, B. E. M., and L. F.De Ros. 2019. “Deposition, Diagenetic and Hydrothermal Processes in the Aptian Pre‐Salt Lacustrine Carbonate Reservoirs of the Northern Campos Basin, Offshore Brazil.” Sedimentary Geology383: 55–81. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0037073819300156.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Mavko, G., T.Mukerji, and J.Dvorkin. 2009. The Rock Physics Handbook: Tools for Seismic Analysis of Porous Media, 2 ed.Cambridge University Press.
  26. Mori, T. A., and K. Tanaka. 1973. “Average Stress in Matrix and Average Elastic Energy of Materials With Misfitting Inclusions.” Acta Metallurgica21: 571–574. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:137067442.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Norris, A.1985. “A Differential Scheme for the Effective Moduli of Composites.” Mechanics of Materials4: 1–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Papoulis, A., and S.Pillai. 2002. Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes, McGraw‐Hill Series in Electrical and Computer Engineering. McGraw‐Hill. https://books.google.com.br/books?id=k22UwAEACAAJ.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Rebelo, T. B., A.Batezelli, N. H.Mattos, and E. P.Leite. 2023. “Sedimentary Processes and Paleoenvironment Reconstruction of the Barra Velha Formation, Santos Basin, Brazilian Pre‐Salt.” Marine and Petroleum Geology150: 106141. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264817223000478.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Silva, A. M., J. P.Figueiredo, P. H. G. R.Coelho, and L.Borghi. 2022. “Tectonic and Stratigraphic Evolution of the Santos Basin Rift Phase: New Insights From Seismic Interpretation on Tupi Oil Field Area.” Journal of South American Earth Sciences116: 103842. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895981122001328.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Tarantola, A.2013. Inverse Problem Theory: Methods for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation. Elsevier Science. https://books.google.com/books?id=l5NWdssuuOgC.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Teillet, T., F.Fournier, L.Zhao, J.Borgomano, and F.Hong. 2021. “Geophysical Pore Type Inversion in Carbonate Reservoir: Integration of Cores, Well Logs, and Seismic Data (Yadana Field, Offshore Myanmar).” Geophysics86: B149–B164.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Vasquez, G. F., M. J.Morschbacher, C. W. D.dos Anjos, Y. M. P.Silva, V.Madrucci, and J. C. R.Justen. 2019. “Petroacoustics and Composition of Presalt Rocks from Santos Basin.” The Leading Edge38: 342–348.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, G., S.Chen, and Y.Wang. 2023. “Direct Inversion for the Equivalent Pore Aspect Ratio Based on the Theory of Ellipsoid Modelling.” Geophysical Prospecting71: 1821–1834.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Xu, S., and M. A.Payne. 2009. “Modeling Elastic Properties in Carbonate Rocks.” The Leading Edge28: 66–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhao, L., M.Nasser, and D.‐h.Han. 2013. “Quantitative Geophysical Pore‐Type Characterization and Its Geological Implication in Carbonate Reservoirs.” Geophysical Prospecting61: 827–841.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70041
Loading
Bayesian Seismic–Petrophysical Inversion for Rock and Fluid Properties and Pore Aspect Ratio in Carbonate Reservoirs
Geophysical Prospecting 73, e70041 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.70041
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70041
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70041
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): inversion; reservoir geophysics; rock physics

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error