1887
Volume 73, Issue 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478
PDF

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Time‐lapse seismic signals and their relation to variations in reservoir pore pressure and fluid saturations are, in general, well understood. Occasionally time‐lapse (4D) seismic data do present some intriguing anomalies that cannot be properly explained by our general well stablished expectations, forcing us to consider less conventional hypotheses. We present one such case, occurring in a weakly cemented sandstone reservoir in the North Sea. This reservoir presents a few 4D seismic softening signals occurring as a response to pore pressure decrease, where no saturation changes are expected. With a detailed multidisciplinary analysis, we assess all possible explanations for this type of signal and show that conventional explanations in terms of fluid saturation changes and/or elastic stress variations fail to explain the full characteristic of the observed anomalies. As an alternative hypothesis, we propose the possibility of pore collapse, an inelastic rock damage process, as an unconventional explanation to the observed anomalies. We show that this hypothesis is the only one that explains all the characteristics of the observed anomalies in terms of their lateral and vertical extents, as well as their magnitude and temporal evolution behaviour. We then conduct a theoretical modelling feasibility study to estimate the critical pressure for initiation of rock damage and estimate the amount of rock damage needed to produce the observed 4D seismic signals. This feasibility study suggests that the reservoir effective pressure achieved during field production is likely not enough to crush grains and cause reservoir compaction. However, they may be enough to cause cement and weak grain cracking, which we estimate through rock physics modelling to be a sufficient mechanism for producing the observed softening anomalies. This makes weakly cemented sandstones more prone to this type of counterintuitive signal, as cement damage occurs at lower effective pressures, more commonly achieved during reservoir production. We also highlight important considerations regarding plans of CO storage into depleted reservoirs, as the possibility of rock damage during production would complicate the monitorability of the injected CO plume.

© 2025 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. © 2025 The Author(s). Geophysical Prospecting published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70057
2025-07-21
2026-02-16

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70057
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/gpr/73/6/gpr70057.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70057&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alvarado, G., M. R.Coop, and S.Willson. 2012. “On the Role of Bond Breakage Due to Unloading in the Behaviour of Weak Sandstones.” Geotechnique62: 303–316.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Barker, T. B., B. N.Chen, P. F.Hague, J.Majain, and K. L.Wong. 2008. “Understanding the Time‐Lapse Seismic Response of a Compacting Carbonate Field. Offshore Sarawak, Malaysia.” In International Petroleum Technology Conference. IPTC.
  3. Caillet, G., C.Séjourné, D.Grauls, and J.Arnaud. 1991. “The Hydrodynamics of the Snorre Field Area, Offshore Norway.” Terra Nova3: 179–193.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Côrte, G., H.Amini, and C.MacBeth. 2023. “Bayesian Inversion of 4D Seismic Data to Pressure and Saturation Changes: Application to a West of Shetlands Field.” Geophysical Prospecting71: 292–321.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Corzo, M., C.MacBeth, and O.Barkved. 2013. “Estimation of Pore‐Pressure Change in a Compacting Reservoir From Time‐Lapse Seismic Data.” Geophysical Prospecting61: 1022–1034.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Dahl, N., and T.Solli. 1993. “The Structural Evolution of the Snorre Field and Surrounding Areas.” Petroleum Geology Conference Proceedings4: 1159–1166.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Fortin, J., Y.Guéguen, and A.Schubnel. 2007. “Effects of Pore Collapse and Grain Crushing on Ultrasonic Velocities and Vp/Vs.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth112: 1–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Fortin, J., A.Schubnel, and Y.Guéguen. 2005. “Elastic Wave Velocities and Permeability Evolution During Compaction of Bleurswiller Sandstone.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences42: 873–889.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Hesthammer, J., C. A.Jourdan, P. E.Nielsen, T. E.Ekern, and K. A.Gibbons. 1999. “A Tectonostratigraphic Framework for the Statfjord Field, Northern North Sea.” Petroleum Geoscience5: 241–256.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Johnston, D. H., and M. N.Toksöz. 1980. “Ultrasonic P and S Wave Attenuation in Dry and Saturated Rocks Under Pressure.” Journal of Geophysical Research85: 925–936.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Jorde, K., and G. W.Diesen. 1992. “The Snorre Field: A Major Field in the Northern North Sea.” In Giant Oil and Gas Fields of the Decade 1978–1988. American Association of Petroleum Geologists.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Li, L., and R.Holt. 2004. “A Study on the Calculation of Particle Volumetric Deformation in a Fluid Coupled PFC Model.” In Numerical Modeling in Micromechanics via Particle Methods. A.A. Balkema Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. MacBeth, C.2004. “A Classification for the Pressure‐Sensitivity Properties of a Sandstone Rock Frame.” Geophysics69: 497–510.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. MacBeth, C., M. D.Mangriotis, and H.Amini. 2019. “Review Paper: Post‐Stack 4D Seismic Time‐Shifts.” Interpretation and Evaluation: Geophysical Prospecting67: 3–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Mindlin, R. D.1949. “Compliance of Elastic Bodies in Contact.” Journal of Applied Mechanics16: 259–268.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Nicolas, A., J.Fortin, and Y.Guéguen. 2017. “Micromechanical Constitutive Model for Low‐Temperature Constant Strain Rate Deformation of Limestones in the Brittle and Semi‐Brittle Regime.” Geophysical Journal International211: 300–321.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Owais, H.2016. Reservoir Characterization of Triassic and Jurassic Sandstones of Snorre Field. Northern North Sea.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Papamichos, E., I.Vardoulakis, and H.Ouadfel. 1993. “Permeability Reduction due to Grain Crushing Around a Perforation.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts30: 1223–1229.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Saul, M., and D.Lumley. 2015. “The Combined Effects of Pressure and Cementation on 4D Seismic Data.” Geophysics80, no. 2: WA135–WA148.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Scott, T. E.2007. “The Effects of Stress Paths on Acoustic Velocities and 4D Seismic Imaging.” Leading Edge (Tulsa, OK)26: 602–608.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Soares, A. C., F. H.Ferreira, and E. A.Vargas. 2002. “An Experimental Study for Mechanical Formation Damage.” SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering5: 480–487.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Sun, Z., H.Tang, D. N.Espinoza, M. T.Balhoff, and J. E.Killough. 2020. “Grain‐ to Reservoir‐Scale Modeling of Depletion‐Induced Compaction and Implications on Production Rate.” SPE Journal25: 1543–1556.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Røste, T., O. P.Dybvik, and O. K.Søreide. 2015. “Overburden 4D time shifts induced by reservoir compaction at Snorre field.” The Leading Edge34, no. 11: 1366–1374. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle34111366.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Tembe, S., P.Baud, and T. F.Wong. 2008. “Stress Conditions for the Propagation of Discrete Compaction Bands in Porous Sandstone.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth113: B09409.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Tengattini, A., A.Das, G. D.Nguyen, G.Viggiani, S. A.Hall, and I.Einav. 2014. “A Thermomechanical Constitutive Model for Cemented Granular Materials With Quantifiable Internal Variables. Part I—Theory.” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids70: 281–296.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Vajdova, V., P.Baud, L.Wu, and T. F.Wong. 2012. “Micromechanics of Inelastic Compaction in Two Allochemical Limestones.” Journal of Structural Geology43: 100–117.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Vejbæk, O. V., F. R.Mohamed, and J. V.Herwanger. 2014. “4D Seismic, 4D Geomechanics and Hydraulic Stimulation in the Low Permeability South Arne Chalk Field.” First Break32: 248–253.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Vernik, L., and M.Kachanov. 2010. “Modeling Elastic Properties of Siliciclastic Rocks.” Geophysics75: 1942–2156.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Wong, T. F.1990. “Mechanical Compaction and the Brittle‐Ductile Transition in Porous Sandstones.” Geological Society Special Publication54: 111–122.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Wong, T. F., and P.Baud. 2012. “The Brittle‐Ductile Transition in Porous Rock: A Review.” Journal of Structural Geology44: 25–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Xu, S., and R. E.White. 1995. “A New Velocity Model for Clay‐Sand Mixtures.” Geophysical Prospecting43: 91–118.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Yu, J., P.Avseth, and K.Duffaut. 2025. “Effects of Overconsolidation on Seismic Rock Physics—A Comparative Study Between Unconsolidated Sands and Weakly Cemented Sandstone.” Geophysics90: MR1–MR12.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang, J., T. F.Wong, and D. M.Davis. 1990. “Micromechanics of Pressure‐Induced Grain Crushing in Porous Rocks.” Journal of Geophysical Research95: 341–352.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhu, W., P.Baud, and T.Wong. 2010. “Micromechanics of Cataclastic Pore Collapse in Limestone.” Journal of Geophysical Research115: B04405.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70057
Loading
The Intriguing 4D Seismic Signature of Reservoir Pore Collapse in Weakly Cemented Sandstones
Geophysical Prospecting 73, e70057 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.70057
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70057
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70057
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error