1887
Volume 73, Issue 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The data recorded by the seismometer on the InSight are contaminated by interference signals called ‘glitches’, which have a specific duration and waveform. These glitches emerge very frequently with large amplitude differences and affect the subsequent processing of the data. Traditional methods for glitches removal rely on the threshold and cannot perfectly detect non‐standard and composite glitches. We propose a deep learning based method for glitch detection and removal. A detection model based on the PhaseNet network is developed for three‐component data. The ConvTasNet from the field of speech signal separation is introduced into the noise removal model to separate the glitches from the single‐component data. The advantages of deep learning include the ability to autonomously extract features from the training set without requiring parameter adjustment and the ability to quickly process large amounts of data. The proposed method can detect and suppress non‐standard glitches and provides a novel approach to removing them from Mars exploration records.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70067
2025-08-13
2026-02-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brinkman, N., D.Sollberger, C.Schmelzbach, S. C.Stähler, and J.Robertsson. 2023. “Applications of Time‐Frequency Domain Polarization Filtering to InSight Seismic Data.” Earth and Space Science10: e2023EA003169.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ceylan, S., J. F.Clinton, D.Giardini, et al. 2021. “Companion Guide to the Marsquake Catalog From InSight, Sols 0–478: Data Content and Non‐Seismic Events.” Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors310: 106597.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Iwan, W. D., M. A.Moser, and C.‐Y.Peng. 1985. “Some Observations on Strong‐Motion Earthquake Measurement Using a Digital Accelerograph.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America75: 1225–1246.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Li, S., J.Zhang, Q.Cheng, F.Zhu, and LLiu. 2023. “Seismic Profile Denoising Based on Common‐Reflection‐Point Gathers Using Convolution Neural Networks.” Journal of Geophysics and Engineering20, no. 2: 240–254.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu, D., W.Wang, X.Wang, C.Wang, J.Pei, and WChen. 2020. “Poststack Seismic Data Denoising Based on 3‐D Convolutional Neural Network.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing58, no. 3: 1598–1629.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lognonné, P., W. B.Banerdt, D.Giardini, et al. 2019. “SEIS: Insight's Seismic Experiment for Internal Structure of Mars.” Space Science Reviews215: 12.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lu, K., Z.Liu, S.Hanafy, and G.Schuster. 2020. “Noise Reduction With Reflection Supervirtual Interferometry.” Geophysics85, no. 3: V249–V256.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Luo, Y., and N.Mesgarani. 2019. “Conv‐TasNet: Surpassing Ideal Time–Frequency Magnitude Masking for Speech Separation.” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing27: 1256–1266.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Naghizadeh, M.2012. “Seismic Data Interpolation and Denoising in the Frequency‐Wavenumber Domain.” Geophysics77, no. 2: V71–V80.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Nealson, K. H.1997. “The Limits of Life on Earth and Searching for Life on Mars.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets102: 23675–23686.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Olyaei, M. H., H.Jalali, A.Noori, et al. 2018. “Fault Detection and Identification on UAV System With CITFA Algorithm Based on Deep Learning.” In Electrical Engineering (ICEE), Iranian Conference on, 988–993.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Pham, N., and SFomel. 2024 “Seismic Data Augmentation for Automatic Fault Picking Using Deep Learning.” Geophysical Prospecting72: 125–141.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Scholz, J.‐R., R.Widmer‐Schnidrig, P.Davis, et al. 2020. “Detection, Analysis, and Removal of Glitches from InSight's Seismic Data From Mars.” Earth and Space Science7: e2020EA001317.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Shao, J., Y.Wang, Y.Yao, S.Wu, Q.Xue, and X.Chang. 2019, “Simultaneous Denoising of Multicomponent Microseismic Data by Joint Sparse Representation With Dictionary Learning.” Geophysics84, no. 5: KS155–KS172.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Vackář, J., J.Burjánek, and J.Zahradník. 2015. “Automated Detection of Long‐Period Disturbances in Seismic Records; MouseTrap Code.” Seismological Research Letters86: 442–450.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Van Den Ende, M. P. A., and J. P.Ampuero. 2020. “Automated Seismic Source Characterization Using Deep Graph Neural Networks.” Geophysical Research Letters47: e2020GL088690.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, J., Z.Xiao, C.Liu, D.Zhao, and ZYao. 2019. “Deep Learning for Picking Seismic Arrival Times.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth124, no. 7: 6612–6624.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Wu, S., Y.Wang, Z.Di, and X.Chang. 2018, “Random Noise Attenuation by 3D Multi‐Directional Vector Median Filter.” Journal of Applied Geophysics159: 277–284.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Wu, X., S.Yan, J.Qi, and H.Zeng. 2020. “Deep Learning for Characterizing Paleokarst Collapse Features in 3‐D Seismic Images.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth125: e2020JB019685.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Xu, W., Q.Zhu, and L.Zhao. 2022. “GlitchNet: A Glitch Detection and Removal System for SEIS Records Based on Deep Learning.” Seismological Research Letters93: 2804–2817.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Zahradnik, J.2005. “Long‐Period Pulses in Broadband Records of Near Earthquakes.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America95: 1928–1939.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhao, Y. X., Y.Li, and N.Wu. 2022, “Unsupervised Dual Learning for Seismic Data Denoising in the Absence of Labelled Data.” Geophysical Prospecting70: 262–279.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhou, R., X.Yao, G.Hu, and F.Yu. 2021. “Learning From Unlabelled Real Seismic Data: Fault Detection Based on Transfer Learning.” Geophysical Prospecting69: 1218–1234.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhu, W., S. M.Mousavi, and G. C.Beroza. 2019. “Seismic Signal Denoising and Decomposition Using Deep Neural Networks.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing57: 9476–9488.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70067
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70067
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
Keyword(s): deep learning; glitch; Mars exploration; noise removal; three‐component

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error