1887
Volume 73, Issue 9
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Seismic fluid discrimination plays a critical role in sweet spot detection, reservoir characterization, reserve evaluation and well placement. Tight sandstone reservoirs are typically characterized by low porosity, poor pore connectivity, complex pore types, non‐uniform gas–water distribution and strong heterogeneity, which often lead to inaccurate fluid discrimination. In this study, we develop a double‐porosity equivalent medium model for tight sandstone reservoirs using the Keys–Xu model combined with Gassmann's equation. We systematically investigate the effects of pore structure, porosity and water saturation on elastic responses. On the basis of this model, a rock physics template (RPT) is constructed using the P‐wave modulus and the P‐ to S‐wave modulus ratio. Polynomial fitting is then applied to derive mathematical expressions for both water‐ and gas‐saturated trendlines. On the basis of these trendlines, an RPT‐based fluid indicator is defined to quantify deviations from the gas‐saturated sandstone trendline. We further apply the proposed fluid indicator to a tight gas sandstone reservoir in the central Sichuan Basin, Southwest China. The strong agreement between the extracted fluid indicator and well log‐based water saturation interpretation demonstrates that this method significantly improves the accuracy of fluid content quantification compared with traditional semi‐quantitative RPT‐based approaches. Application to seismic data further shows that our method yields a reasonable estimation of gas distribution in tight sandstone reservoirs, confirming its reliability and practical applicability for fluid characterization. This approach offers promising potential for quantifying fluid content in deep‐buried tight reservoirs.

© 2025 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. © 2025 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70100
2025-10-31
2026-01-21

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70100
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Avseth, P., and T.Veggeland. 2015. “Seismic Screening of Rock Stiffness and Fluid Softening Using Rock‐Physics Attributes.” Interpretation3, no. 4: SAE85–SAE93. https://doi.org/10.1190/INT‐2015‐0054.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ba, J., Z.Fang, L.Fu, and Q.Guo. 2023. “Seismic Inversion Method for Tight Sandstone Reservoir Properties Based on a Variable Critical Porosity Model.” Chinese Journal of Geophysics66, no. 6: 2576–2591. https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg2022Q0106.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Berryman, J.1980. “Long‐Wavelength Propagation in Composite Elastic Media I. Spherical Inclusions.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America68, no. 6: 1809–1819. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.385172.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Brie, A., F.Pampuri, A.Marsala, and O.Meazza. 1995. “Shear Sonic Interpretation in Gas‐Bearing Sands.” Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, October 22. https://doi.org/10.2118/30595‐MS.
  5. Castagna, J., H.Swan, and D.Foster. 1998. “Framework for AVO Gradient and Intercept Interpretation.” Geophysics63, no. 3: 948–956. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444406.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Farfour, M., and B.Russell. 2024. “The Old and New of Fluid Indicators: An Overview and Application.” Leading Edge43, no. 5: 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle43050294.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Gao, S., M.Xu, L.Zhao, Y.Chen, and J.Geng. 2023. “Seismic Predictions of Fluids via Supervised Deep Learning: Incorporating Various Class‐Rebalance Strategies.” Geophysics88, no. 4: M185–M200. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2022‐0363.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Gassmann, F.1951. “Elastic Waves Through a Packing of Spheres.” Geophysics16, no. 4: 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1437718.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Goodway, B., T.Chen, and J.Downton. 1997. “Improved AVO Fluid Detection and Lithology Discrimination Using Lamé Petrophysical Parameters; 'λρ', μρ, Λμ Fluid Stack, From P and S Inversions.” In Proceedings of the 67th Annual International Meeting Society Exploration Geophysicists, 183–186. SEG Library. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1885795.
  10. Han, G., H.Gao, F.Long, D.Qin, J.Li, and H.Wang. 2021. “Prestack Elastic Inversion for Sweet‐Spot Prediction in Tight Reservoirs in Xihu Sag.” Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum60, no. 3: 471–478. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000‐1441.2021.03.013.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Hill, R.1952. “The Elastic Behaviour of a Crystalline Aggregate.” Proceedings of the Physical Society Section A65, no. 5: 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1088/0370‐1298/65/5/307.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Keys, R., and S.Xu. 2002. “An Approximation for the Xu‐White Velocity Model.” Geophysics67, no. 5: 1406–1414. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1512786.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Lai, J., G.Wang, C.Meng, et al. 2015. “Pore Structure Characteristics and Formation Mechanisms Analysis of Tight Gas Sandstones.” Progress in Geophysics30, no. 1: 217–227. https://doi.org/10.6038/pg20150133.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Li, H., S.Cai, and H.Pan. 2019b. “A Porosity‐Insensitive Normalized Fluid Factor Based on Rock Physics Templates.” Paper presented at the SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, San Antonio, Texas, USA, September 15. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2019‐3215734.1.
  15. Li, H., J.Zhang, S.Cai, and H.Pan. 2019a. “3D Rock Physics Template for Reservoirs With Complex Pore Structure.” Chinese Journal of Geophysics62, no. 7: 2711–2723. https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg2019K0672.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, J., and X.Chen. 2008. “Reservoir Fluid Identification Based on Seismic Data.” Acta Petrolei Sinica29, no. 2: 235–238. https://doi.org/10.7623/syxb200802014.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu, M., D.Grana, and L.de Figueiredo. 2022. “Uncertainty Quantification in Stochastic Inversion With Dimensionality Reduction Using Variational Autoencoder.” Geophysics87, no. 2: M43–M58. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2021‐0138.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu, Q., X.Yin, and C.Li. 2015. “Fluid Discrimination Based on Rock Physics Templates.” Journal of Geophysics and Engineering12, no. 5: 830–838. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742–2132/12/5/830.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu, X., X.Yin, Z.Zong, and W.Cui. 2016. “A Stable Inversion of Effective Fluid Bulk Modulus.” Oil Geophysical Prospecting51, no. 6: 1164–1170. https://doi.org/10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Ostrander, W.1984. “Plane‐Wave Reflection Coefficients for Gas Sands at Nonnormal Angles of Incidence.” Geophysics49, no. 10: 1637–1648. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441571.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Pan, H., C.Wei, X.Yan, et al. 2024. “3D Rock Physics Template‐Based Probabilistic Estimation of Tight Sandstone Reservoir Properties.” Petroleum Science21, no. 5: 3090–3101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2024.04.010.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Pang, M., J.Ba, J.Carcione, et al. 2025. “Structural and Elastic Properties of Carbonate Rocks With Different Pore Types Based on Digital and Theoretical Rock Physics.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth130, no. 3: e2024JB030538. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JB030538.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Pang, M., J.Ba, J.Carcione, M.Balcewicz, W.Yue, and E.Saenger. 2022. “Acoustic and Electrical Properties of Tight Rocks: A Comparative Study Between Experiment and Theory.” Surveys in Geophysics43, no. 6: 1761–1791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712‐022‐09730‐3.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Pang, M., J.Ba, J.Carcione, S.Picotti, J.Zhou, and R.Jiang. 2019. “Estimation of Porosity and Fluid Saturation in Carbonates From Rock‐Physics Templates Based on Seismic Q.” Geophysics84, no. 6: M25–M36. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2019‐0031.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Quakenbush, M., B.Shang, and C.Tuttle. 2006. “Poisson Impedance.” Leading Edge25, no. 2: 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2172301.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Russell, B., D.Gray, and D.Hampson. 2011. “Linearized AVO and Poroelasticity.” Geophysics76, no. 3: C19–C29. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3555082.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Russell, B., K.Hedlin, F.Hilterman, L.Lines, and D.Lawton. 2003. “Fluid‐Property Discrimination With AVO: A Biot‐Gassmann Perspective.” Geophysics68: 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1543192.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Rutherford, S., and R.Williams. 1989. “Amplitude‐Versus‐Offset Variations in Gas Sands.” Geophysics54, no. 6: 680–688. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442696.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Smith, G., and P.Gidlow. 1987. “Weighted Stacking for Rock Property Estimation and Detection of Gas.” Geophysical Prospecting35: 993–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365‐2478.1987.tb00856.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Yin, X., and S.Zhang. 2014. “Bayesian Inversion for Effective Pore‐Fluid Bulk Modulus Based on Fluid‐Matrix Decoupled Amplitude Variation With Offset Approximation.” Geophysics79: R221–R232. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013‐0372.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang, G., J.Chen, H.Chen, J.Zhang, and X.Yin. 2015. “Quantitative Interpretation of Carbonate Gas Reservoir Based on Rock Physics Template.” Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition)45, no. 2: 630–638. https://doi.org/10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201502304.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang, Z., A.Halpert, L.Bandura, and A.Coumont. 2018. “Machine‐Learning Based Technique for Lithology and Fluid Content Prediction: Case Study From Offshore West Africa.” In SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 2271–2276. SEG. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2018‐2996428.1.
  33. Zhao, J.2012. “Conception, Classification and Resource Potential of Unconventional Hydrocarbons.” Natural Gas Geoscience23, no. 3: 393–406. https://doi.org/10.11764/j.issn.1672‐1926.2012.03.393.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhao, J., J.Liu, Q.Zhang, and X.Qu. 2017. “Overview of Geophysical Exploration Methods and Technical of Tight Sandstone Gas Reservoirs.” Progress in Geophysics32, no. 2: 840–848. https://doi.org/10.6038/pg20170253.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhao, J., J.Pan, Y.Hu, et al. 2021a. “Digital Rock Physics‐Based Studies on Effect of Pore Types on Elastic Properties of Carbonate Reservoir Part 2: Pore Structure Factor Characterization and Inversion of Reservoir.” Chinese Journal of Geophysics64, no. 2: 670–683. https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg2021O0227.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhao, L., J.Liu, M.Xu, Z.Zhu, Y.Chen, and J.Geng. 2024. “Rock‐Physics‐Guided Machine Learning for Shear Sonic Log Prediction.” Geophysics89, no. 1: D75–D87. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2023‐0152.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhao, L., C.Zou, Y.Chen, et al. 2021b. “Fluid and Lithofacies Prediction Based on Integration of Well‐Log Data and Seismic Inversion: A Machine‐Learning Approach.” Geophysics86, no. 4: M151–M165. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2020‐0521.1.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhu, W., L.Zhao, and Y.Wang. 2021. “Digital Rock‐Based Broadband Dynamic Stress‐Strain Simulation Method and Its Applications for Characterization of Dispersion and Attenuation Signatures of Tight Cracked Rock.” Chinese Journal of Geophysics64, no. 6: 2086–2096. https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg2021O0302.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Zou, C., L.Zhao, M.Xu, Y.Chen, and J.Geng. 2021. “Porosity Prediction With Uncertainty Quantification From Multiple Seismic Attributes Using Random Forest.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth126, no. 7: e2021JB021826. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB021826.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Zou, C., R.Zhu, S.Wu, Z.Yang, S.Tao, and X.Yuan. 2012. “Types, Characteristics, Genesis and Prospects of Conventional and Unconventional Hydrocarbon Accumulations: Taking Tight Oil and Tight Gas in China as an Instance.” Acta Petrolei Sinica33, no. 2: 173–187. https://doi.org/10.7623/syxb201202001.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70100
Loading
Rock Physics Template–Based Fluid Detection in Tight Sandstone Reservoirs
Geophysical Prospecting 73, e70100 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.70100
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70100
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70100
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): fluid indicator; rock physics model; rock physics template; seismic interpretation; tight sandstone reservoirs

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error