1887
Volume 73, Issue 9
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The transformative impact of deep‐learning architectures on machine learning has been substantial. Recently, a wide range of studies have successfully applied these methods to seismic facies segmentation using well‐established public datasets, such as F3 and SEAM AI. However, many of these works lack detailed descriptions of their methodologies and implementation details, including dataset partitioning, hyperparameter settings and other critical aspects. The lack of reproducibility information makes fair comparison between studies quite difficult, as methodological details can heavily affect the results obtained. In this work, we discuss this problem and present a fair comparison between five state‐of‐the‐art models commonly used in the literature: DeepLab V3, DeepLab V3+, Segmenter, SegFormer and SETR. We found that the SETR model has promising performance on both the F3 and SEAM AI datasets and convolutional neural network models offer a higher performance to parameter count ratio compared to the transformer models.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70104
2025-12-01
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/gpr/73/9/gpr70104.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70104&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abid, B., B. M.Khan, and R. A.Memon. 2022. “Seismic Facies Segmentation Using Ensemble of Convolutional Neural Networks.” Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing2022, no. 1: 7762543.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alaudah, Y., P.Michałowicz, M.Alfarraj, and G.AlRegib. 2019. “A Machine‐Learning Benchmark for Facies Classification.” Interpretation7, no. 3: SE175–SE187.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bosco de Miranda, D. C., and M.Gattass. 2023. “Vision Transformers e Masked Autoencoders para segmentação de fácies sísmicas.” Master's thesis, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro.
  4. Chen, L.‐C., G.Papandreou, F.Schroff, and H.Adam. 2017. “Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation.” Preprint, arXiv, December 5. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.05587.
  5. Chen, L.‐C., Y.Zhu, G.Papandreou, F.Schroff, and H.Adam. 2018. “Encoder‐Decoder With Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation.” In Computer Vision ‐ ECCV 2018, edited by V.Ferrari, M.Hebert, C.Sminchisescu, and Y.Weiss, 833–851. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11211. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Corporation, S. A. M.2023. “Facies Identification Challenge.” Accessed 27 October 2023. https://www.aicrowd.com/challenges/seismic‐facies‐identification‐challenge.
  7. Guo, Z., X.Wu, L.Liang, H.Sheng, N.Chen, and Z.Bi. 2024. “Cross‐Domain Foundation Model Adaptation: Pioneering Computer Vision Models for Geophysical Data Analysis.” Preprint, arXiv, August 22. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.12396.
  8. Kaur, H., N.Pham, S.Fomel, et al. 2023. “A Deep Learning Framework for Seismic Facies Classification.” Interpretation11, no. 1: T107–T116.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. MMSegmentation, C.o .. 2020. “MMSegmentation: OpenMMLab Semantic Segmentation Toolbox and Benchmark.” https://github.com/open‐mmlab/mmsegmentation.
  10. Ridnik, T., E.Ben‐Baruch, A.Noy, and L.Zelnik‐Manor. 2021. “Imagenet‐21k Pretraining for the Masses.” Preprint, arXiv, August 5. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.10972.
  11. Sheng, H., X.Wu, X.Si, J.Li, S.Zhang, and X.Duan. 2023. “Seismic Foundation Model (SFM): A New Generation Deep Learning Model in Geophysics.” Preprint, arXiv, December 15. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.02791.
  12. Silva, R. M., L.Baroni, R. S.Ferreira, D.Civitarese, D.Szwarcman, and E. V.Brazil. 2019. “Netherlands Dataset: A New Public Dataset for Machine Learning in Seismic Interpretation.” Preprint, arXiv, March 26. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.00770.
  13. Strudel, R., R.Garcia, I.Laptev, and C.Schmid. 2021. “Segmenter: Transformer for Semantic Segmentation.” Preprint, arXiv, September 2. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.05633.
  14. Tolstaya, E., and A.Egorov. 2022. “Deep Learning for Automated Seismic Facies Classification.” Interpretation10, no. 2: SC31–SC40.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Trindade, E. A., and M.Roisenberg. 2021. “Multi‐View 3D Seismic Facies Classifier.” In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, 1003–1011. ACM.
  16. Wang, Z., Q.Wang, Y.Yang, N.Liu, Y.Chen, and J.Gao. 2023. “Seismic Facies Segmentation via a Segformer‐Based Specific Encoder–Decoder–Hypercolumns Scheme.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing61: 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Xie, E., W.Wang, Z.Yu, A.Anandkumar, J. M.Alvarez, and P.Luo. 2021. “SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation With Transformers.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems34: 12077–12090.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Zheng, S., J.Lu, H.Zhao, et al. 2021. “Rethinking Semantic Segmentation From a Sequence‐to‐Sequence Perspective With Transformers.” In 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 6877–6886. IEEE.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70104
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70104
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error