1887
Volume 74, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478
PDF

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Accurate characterization of pore structures in carbonate rocks is critical for evaluating fluid flow and storage capacity in subsurface reservoirs, a key concern in geophysical exploration and reservoir engineering. This study proposes a hybrid digital rock physics workflow that integrates deep learning–based segmentation, vectorial geometric analysis and clustering techniques to investigate pore‐scale features using x‐ray micro‐computed tomography at resolutions of 22 and 42 m. A convolutional neural network (CNN) enhances the segmentation ofcomplex pore geometries, addressing the limitations of conventional thresholding methods. To estimate the representative elementary volume, two‐dimensional porosity () distributions were integrated into three‐dimensional space using Riemannian methods. Pore connectivity () was quantified via the coordination number (), derived from a vector‐based analysis of local tangents and orthogonals, enabling precise identification of throats and pore networks. CNN models were trained on two carbonate samples (IL033 and IL636), achieving training accuracies of 0.9850 and 0.9914 and validation accuracies of 0.9854 and 0.9918, respectively. Total porosity () estimates from the CNN and classical segmentation approaches were compared to experimental data, with the deep learning approach showing superior performance, especially in capturing isolated or poorly connected pores at higher resolutions. This integrated methodology offers a powerful framework for quantifying microstructural heterogeneity and its influence on pore connectivity and geometry, contributing to more realistic geophysical modelling and reservoir simulation.

© 2026 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. © 2026 The Author(s). Geophysical Prospecting published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70117
2026-01-19
2026-02-15

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70117
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/gpr/74/1/gpr70117.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70117&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Agbogun, H., T. A.Al, and E. M.Hussein. 2013. “Three Dimensional Imaging of Porosity and Tracer Concentration Distributions in a Dolostone Sample During Diffusion Experiments Using X‐Ray micro‐CT.” Journal of Contaminant Hydrology145: 44–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alqahtani, N., Y.Niu, Y. D.Wang, et al. 2022. “Super‐Resolved Segmentation of X‐Ray Images of Carbonate Rocks Using Deep Learning.” Transport in Porous Media143: 497–525.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Berg, C. F., O.Lopez, and H.Berland. 2017. “Industrial Applications of Digital Rock Technology.” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering157: 131–147.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Blunt, M. J.2017. Multiphase Flow in Permeable Media: A Pore‐Scale Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Cooper, D., A.Turinsky, C. W.Sensen, and B.Hallgrimsson. 2007. “Effect of Voxel Size on 3D Micro‐CT Analysis of Cortical Bone Porosity.” Calcified Tissue International80: 211–219.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Da Silveira, J. R. B., J. J.De Figueiredo, C. R.Lima, J. F. V.Gonçalvez, and M. L.Do Amaral. 2024. “S‐Wave Log Construction Through Semi‐Supervised Regression Clustering Using Machine Learning: A Case Study of North Sea Fields.” Journal of Applied Geophysics229: 105476.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. R Dice, L.1945. “Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species.” Ecology26: 297–302.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Dong, H., and M. J.Blunt. 2009. “Pore‐Network Extraction From Micro‐Computed Tomography Images.” Physical Review E80: 036307.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Edelsbrunner, H., D.Letscher, and A.Zomorodian. 2000. “Topological Persistence and Simplification.” Discrete & Computational Geometry28: 511–533.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Elkhoury, J., R.Shankar, and T.Ramakrishnan. 2019. “Resolution and Limitations of X‐Ray Micro‐CT With Applications to Sandstones and Limestones.” Transport in Porous Media129: 1–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Elmahdy, M., A. A.Radwan, B. S.Nabawy, A.Abdelmaksoud, and A. V.Nastavkin. 2023. “Integrated Geophysical, Petrophysical and Petrographical Characterization of the Carbonate and Clastic Reservoirs of the Waihapa Field, Taranaki Basin, New Zealand.” Marine and Petroleum Geology151: 106173.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Esteves, Ferreira, M., M.Rodrigues Del Grande, R.Neumann Barros Ferreira, et al. 2023. “Full Scale, Microscopically Resolved Tomographies of Sandstone and Carbonate Rocks Augmented by Experimental Porosity and Permeability Values.” Scientific Data10: 368.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Feng, Y., L.Zhao, M.Xu, J.Liu, K.Zhou, and J.Geng. 2025. “Simultaneous Prediction of Porosity, Saturation, and Lithofacies from Seismic Data via Multitask Deep Learning.” Geophysics90: M135–M151.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. T Gostick, J.2017. “Versatile and Efficient Pore Network Extraction Method Using Marker‐Based Watershed Segmentation.” Physical Review. E 96: 023307.
  15. Hasoon, S., and G.Farman. 2024. “A Comprehensive Review for Integrating Petrophysical Properties, Rock Typing, and Geological Modeling for Enhanced Reservoir Characterization.” Journal of Engineering30: 69–101.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Idowu, N.2009. “Pore‐Scale Modeling of Permeability and Relative Permeability in Heterogeneous Porous Media.” PhD diss. Imperial College London.
  17. Jaccard, P.1908. “Nouvelles Recherches Sur la Distribution Florale.” Bulletin de la Societe Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles44: 223–270.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Jiang, F., T.Tsuji, and T.Shirai. 2018. “Pore Geometry Characterization by Persistent Homology Theory.” Water Resources Research54: 4150–4163.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Joshi, R. M., A.Kumar, and K. H.Singh. 2023. “A Simulation and Data Informed Approach to Porosity Partitioning.” Geoenergy Science and Engineering229: 212044.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Kou, X., and S.Tan. 2007. “Heterogeneous Object Modeling: A Review.” Computer‐Aided Design39: 284–301.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee, H.‐B., M.Jung, Y.‐H.Kim, et al. 2023. “Deep Learning Image Segmentation for the Reliable Porosity Measurement of High‐Capacity Ni‐Based Oxide Cathode Secondary Particles.” Journal of Analytical Science and Technology14: 47.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, K.‐Q., Y.Liu, and Z.‐Y.Yin. 2023. “An Improved 3D Microstructure Reconstruction Approach for Porous Media.” Acta Materialia242: 118472.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Lin, W., and C.‐C. J.Kuo. 2011. “Perceptual Visual Quality Metrics: A Survey.” Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation22: 297–312.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Lyu, C., S.Hao, Q.Sun, W.Zhang, and J.Geng. 2021. “Permeability Evolution of Two Sedimentary Rocks at Different Temperatures Based on the Katz‐Thompson Theory.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences144: 104819.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Mahdaviara, M., M. J.Shojaei, J.Siavashi, M.Sharifi, and M. J.Blunt. 2023. “Deep Learning for Multiphase Segmentation of X‐Ray Images of Gas Diffusion Layers.” Fuel345: 128180.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Malik, J., S.Kiranyaz, R. I.Al‐Raoush, et al. 2022. “3D Quantum Cuts for Automatic Segmentation of Porous Media in Tomography Images.” Computers & Geosciences159: 105017.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Montazerolghaem, M., Y.Sun, G.Sasso, and A.Haworth. 2023. “U‐Net Architecture for Prostate Segmentation: The Impact of Loss Function on System Performance.” Bioengineering10: 412.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Rabbani, A., A. M.Fernando, R.Shams, A.Singh, P.Mostaghimi, and M.Babaei. 2021. “Review of Data Science Trends and Issues in Porous Media Research With a Focus on Image‐Based Techniques.” Water Resources Research57: e2020WR029472.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Safavi, S. J., and R.Maldar. 2024. “An Enhancement in the Petrophysical Evaluation in a Vuggy Carbonate Gas Reservoir by Integrating the Core Data and Empirical Methods, Zagros Basin, South of Iran.” Journal of Asian Earth Sciences: X11: 100177.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Sari, M.2021. “Determination of Representative Elementary Volume (REV) for Jointed Rock Masses Exhibiting Scale‐Dependent Behavior: A Numerical Investigation.” International Journal of Geo‐Engineering12: 34.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Silva, D. F. d. N., D. M.Pérez, Y. G.Proenza, B. F. d.Carvalho, A. G.Rodríguez, and A. C. D.Antonino. 2024. “Quantifying Filter Layer Porosity: A Comparative Study of X‐Ray Microtomography, Fluid Injection, and Fluid Saturation Techniques.” Journal of Environmental Analysis and Progress9: 356–368.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Sørensen, T.1948. “A Method of Establishing Groups of Equal Amplitude in Plant Sociology Based on Similarity of Species Content and Its Application to Analyses of the Vegetation on Danish Commons.” Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab5: 1–34. https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=2150293.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Talbi, D., Z.Daoui, and Z.Gal. 2024. “Unsupervised Machine Learning‐Based Clustering of High‐Frequency Radio Channel Properties: Analysis of Sector Communication Efficiency.”Procedia Computer Science 238, 306–313. The 15th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies Networks (ANT)/The Seventh International Conference on Emerging Data and Industry 4.0 (EDI40), April 23–25, 2024, Hasselt University, Belgium.
  34. Vincent, L., and P.Soille. 1991. “Watersheds in Digital Spaces: An Efficient Algorithm Based on Immersion Simulations.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence13: 583–598.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Wang, Z., A.Bovik, H.Sheikh, and E.Simoncelli. 2004. “Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity.” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing13: 600–612.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Watanabe, N., H.Kusanagi, T.Shimazu, and M.Yagi. 2019. “Local Non‐Vuggy Modeling and Relations Among Porosity, Permeability and Preferential Flow for Vuggy Carbonates.” Engineering Geology248: 197–206.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Wu, Y., and Q.Li. 2022. “The Algorithm of Watershed Color Image Segmentation Based on Morphological Gradient.” Sensors22: 8202.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Wu, Y., P.Tahmasebi, C.Lin, M. J.Munawar, and V.Cnudde. 2019. “Effects of Micropores on Geometric, Topological and Transport Properties of Pore Systems for Low‐Permeability Porous Media.” Journal of Hydrology575: 327–342.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhao, L., J.Liu, M.Xu, Z.Zhu, Y.Chen, and J.Geng. 2024. “Rock‐Physics‐Guided Machine Learning for Shear Sonic Log Prediction.” Geophysics89: D75–D87.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Zomorodian, A., and G.Carlsson. 2005. “Computing Persistent Homology.” Discrete and Computational Geometry33: 249–274.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70117
Loading
Vector‐Based and Machine Learning Approaches for Pore Network Parameters Analysis
Geophysical Prospecting 74, e70117 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.70117
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70117
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70117
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error