1887
Volume 74, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Characterization of cracks is a key issue in shale oil and gas that have become increasingly important in the hydrocarbon industry. Seismic exploration is frequently employed for the characterization of cracks in shale reservoirs. However, the accurate interpretation of seismic data for characterizing cracks in shale reservoirs remains a significant challenge, primarily due to an insufficient understanding of how subsurface pressure affects the anisotropic elastic properties of cracked shales. To address this knowledge gap, this study systematically investigates the effects of confining pressure on the anisotropic elastic properties of cracked artificial shales, with a specific focus on decoupling the distinct roles of background porosity and crack porosity. The five anisotropic elastic velocities were measured on manufactured shale samples with varying crack and background porosity, respectively, and the corresponding anisotropic parameters, Young's moduli and Poisson's ratios were derived as a function of confining pressure. The results demonstrate that the influence of crack porosity on reducing the velocities and on enhancing the elastic anisotropy is significantly more pronounced than that of background porosity. Notably, the velocities across the cracks, (0°) and (0°), exhibit the greatest sensitivity to pressure changes, especially in samples with high crack porosity. Consequently, all the anisotropic parameters reduce exponentially with increasing confining pressure, with the reduction being most significant in shales with either the lowest background porosity or the highest crack porosity. The pressure‐dependent geomechanical properties (Young's moduli and Poisson's ratios) reveal that the direction parallel to cracks remains the most favourable path for hydraulic fracturing, particularly under low confining pressure and in rocks with high crack porosity. These findings provide critical insights for improving the quantitative interpretation of seismic data for characterizing cracks and for optimizing hydraulic fracturing design in shale reservoirs.

© 2026 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. © 2026 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70136
2026-01-21
2026-02-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70136
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baird, A. F., J.‐M.Kendall, Q. J.Fisher, and J.Budge. 2017. “The Role of Texture, Cracks, and Fractures in Highly Anisotropic Shales.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth122: 10341–10351.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Boak, J., and R.Kleinberg. 2020. “Shale Gas, Tight Oil, Shale Oil and Hydraulic Fracturing.” In Future Energy. Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Carcione, J. M., and P.Avseth. 2015. “Rock‐Physics Templates for Clay‐Rich Source Rocks.” Geophysics80, no. 5: D481–D500.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Chapman, M.2003. “Frequency‐Dependent Anisotropy Due to Meso‐Scale Fractures in the Presence of Equant Porosity.” Geophysical Prospecting51: 369–379.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Chopra, S., R. K.Sharma, A. K.Ray, et al. 2017. “Seismic Reservoir Characterization of Duvernay Shale With Quantitative Interpretation and Induced Seismicity Considerations—A Case Study.” Interpretation5: T185–T197.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Christensen, R. M., and E. A.Zywicz. 1990. “Three‐Dimensional Constitutive Theory for Fiber Composite Laminated Media.” Journal of Applied Mechanics57: 948–955.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Coyner, K. B.1984. “Effect of Stress, Pore Pressure, and Pore Fluids on Bulk Strain, Velocity, and Permeability of Rocks.” PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  8. David, E. C., and R. W.Zimmerman. 2012. “Pore Structure Model for Elastic Wave Velocities in Fluid‐Saturated Sandstones.” Journal of Geophysical Research117: B07210.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Dewhurst, D. N., and A. F.Siggins. 2006. “Impact of Fabric, Microcracks and Stress Field on Shale Anisotropy.” Geophysical Journal International165: 135–148.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Ding, J., A. C.Clark, T.Vanorio, A. D.Jew, and J. R.Bargar. 2022. “Elastic Anisotropy of Shales: The Roles of Crack Alignment and Compliance Ratio.” Geophysics87, no. 2: A13–A17.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Ding, P., B.Di, D.Wang, J.Wei, and X.Li. 2017. “Measurements of Seismic Anisotropy in Synthetic Rocks With Controlled Crack Geometry and Different Crack Densities.” Pure and Applied Geophysics174: 1907–1922.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Eberhart‐Phillips, D., D. H.Han, and M. D.Zoback. 1989. “Empirical Relationships Among Seismic Velocity, Effective Pressure, Porosity, and Clay Content in Sandstone.” Geophysics54: 82–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Fu, B., and L.‐Y.Fu. 2024. “Acoustoelastic DZ‐MT Model for Stress‐Dependent Elastic Moduli of Fractured Rocks.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences174: 105649.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Gale, J. F. W., S. E.Laubach, J. E.Olson, P.Eichhubl, and A.Fall. 2014. “Natural Fractures in Shale: A Review and New Observations.” AAPG Bulletin98: 2165–2216.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Gao, W., X.Liu, J.Hu, and Y.Feng. 2022. “A Novel Bilinear Constitutive Law for Cohesive Elements to Model the Fracture of Pressure‐Dependent Rocks.” Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering55: 521–540.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gavrilenko, P., and Y.Guéguen. 1989. “Pressure Dependence of Permeability: A Model for Cracked Rocks.” Geophysical Journal International98, no. 1: 159–172.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Ghassemi, A.2012. “A Review of Some Rock Mechanics Issues in Geothermal Reservoir Development.” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering30: 647–664.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Gong, F., B.Di, J.Wei, P.Ding, H.Li, and D.Li. 2018. “Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Clay Content and Compaction Stress on the Elastic Properties and Anisotropy of Dry and Saturated Synthetic Shale.” Geophysics83, no. 5: C195–C208.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Gong, F., L.Gao, G.Zou, Y.Zhao, G.Wang, and S.Cao. 2023. “The Effects of Clay Mineralogy and Crack Properties on Elastic Properties of Dry and Water‐Saturated Transversely Isotropic Rocks.” Geophysics88, no. 3: MR155–MR169.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Guo, J., T.Han, L.‐Y.Fu, D.Xu, and X.Fang. 2019. “Effective Elastic Properties of Rocks With Transversely Isotropic Background Permeated by Aligned Penny‐Shaped Cracks.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth124: 400–424.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Han, T., A. I.Best, J.Sothcott, and L. M.MacGregor. 2011. “Pressure Effects on the Joint Elastic‐Electrical Properties of Reservoir Sandstones.” Geophysical Prospecting59: 506–517.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Han, T., B.Gurevich, L.‐Y.Fu, Q.Qi, J.Wei, and X.Chen. 2020. “Combined Effects of Pressure and Water Saturation on the Seismic Anisotropy in Artificial Porous Sandstone With Aligned Fractures.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth125: e2019JB019091.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Han, T., H.Sun, P.Wang, and L.‐Y.Fu. 2023. “Pore Pressure Effects on the Anisotropic Joint Elastic‐Electrical Properties of Artificial Porous Sandstones With Aligned Fractures.” Geophysics88, no. 4: MR229–MR239.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Han, T., H.Yan, B.Li, and L.‐Y.Fu. 2022. “Pressure‐Dependent Joint Elastic–Electrical Properties in Brine‐Saturated Artificial Sandstones With Aligned Penny‐Shaped Cracks—Part I: Experimental Results.” Geophysical Journal International228: 1071–1082.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Higgins, S., S.Goodwin, and A.Donald. 2008. “Anisotropic Stress Models Improve Completion Design in the Baxter Shale: Presented at the Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.” Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.
  26. Hudson, J. A.1981. “Wave Speeds and Attenuation of Elastic Waves in Material Containing Cracks.” Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society64: 133–150.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Josh, M., L.Esteban, C.Delle Piane, J.Sarout, D. N.Dewhurst, and M. B.Clennell. 2012. “Laboratory Characterisation of Shale Properties.” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering88–89: 107–124.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Kaselow, A., and S. A.Shapiro. 2004. “Stress Sensitivity of Elastic Moduli and Electrical Resistivity in Porous Rocks.” Journal of Geophysics and Engineering1: 1–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Kaura, A. M., Y.Andrawus, and A. Y.Ibrahim. 2025. “Geophysics, Geology, Formation Evaluation, and Reservoir Characterization in Unconventional Resources.” In Unconventional Resources. CRC Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Khadijeh, M., A.Yehya, and E.Maalouf. 2022. “Propagation and Geometry of Multi‐Stage Hydraulic Fractures in Anisotropic Shales.” Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo‐Energy and Geo‐Resources8: 124.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Khaksar, A., C. M.Griffiths, and C.McCann. 1999. “Compressional and Shear‐Wave Velocities as a Function of Confining Stress in Dry Sandstones.” Geophysical Prospecting47: 487–508.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee, J., and D. E.Lumley. 2023. “Interpreting the Effects of Shale Rock Properties on Seismic Anisotropy by Statistical and Machine Learning Methods.” Geoenergy Science and Engineering224: 211631.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Lu, M., T.Han, P.Wang, and L.‐Y.Fu. 2023. “Permeability of Artificial Sandstones Identified by Their Dual‐Pore Structure.” Geophysical Journal International234: 1422–1429.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Luan, X. Y., B. R.Di, and J. X.Wei. 2016. “Creation of Synthetic Samples for Physical Modelling of Natural Shale.” Geophysical Prospecting64: 898–914.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Mavko, G., T.Mukerji, and J.Dvorkin. 2009. The Rock Physics Handbook: Tools for Seismic Analysis of Porous Media. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Melikoglu, M.2014. “Shale Gas: Analysis of Its Role in the Global Energy Market.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews37: 460–468.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Nwankwo, I. V., M.Dejam, and S. A.Quillinan. 2025. “A Critical Review of Experimental and Theoretical Studies on Shale Geomechanical and Deformation Properties, Fluid Flow Behavior, and Coupled Flow and Geomechanics Effects During Production.” International Journal of Coal Geology306: 104777.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Ong, O. N., D. R.Schmitt, R. S.Kofman, and K.Haug. 2016. “Static and Dynamic Pressure Sensitivity Anisotropy of a Calcareous Shale.” Geophysical Prospecting64: 875–897.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Pang, M., J.Ba, J. M.Carcione, et al. 2025. “Structural and Elastic Properties of Carbonate Rocks With Different Pore Types Based on Digital and Theoretical Rock Physics.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth130: e2024JB030538.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Pang, M., J.Ba, J. M.Carcione, and E. H.Saenger. 2024. “Combined Acoustical‐Electrical Modeling for Tight Sandstones Verified by Laboratory Measurements.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences173: 105682.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Pervukhina, M., B.Gurevich, P.Goloduniuc, and D. N.Dewhurst. 2011. “Parameterization of Elastic Stress Sensitivity in Shales.” Geophysics76, no. 3: WQ147–WA155.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Pimienta, L., J.Sarout, L.Esteban, C.David, and M. B.Clennell. 2017. “Pressure‐Dependent Elastic and Transport Properties of Porous and Permeable Rocks: Microstructural Control.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth122: 8952–8968.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Rahimi‐Aghdam, S., V.Chau, H.Lee, et al. 2019. “Branching of Hydraulic Cracks Enabling Permeability of Gas or Oil Shale With Closed Natural Fractures.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United states of America116: 1532–1537.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Rasouli, V.2015. “Geomechanics of Gas Shales.” In Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs, edited by R.Rezaee, 169–190. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Ren, S., T.Han, L.Fu, and H.Yan. 2021. “Pressure Effects on the Anisotropic Velocities of Rocks With Aligned Fractures.” Chinese Journal of Geophysics64, no. 7: 2504–2514.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Sarout, J., and Y.Guéguen. 2008. “Anisotropy of Elastic Wave Velocities in Deformed Shale: Part 1—Experimental Results.” Geophysics73, no. 5: D75–D89.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Sarout, J., L.Molez, Y.Gueguen, and N.Hoteit. 2007. “Shale Dynamic Properties and Anisotropy Under Triaxial Loading: Experimental and Theoretical Investigations.” Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C32: 896–906.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Sayers, C. M.1999. “Stress‐Dependent Seismic Anisotropy of Shales.” Geophysics64: 93–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Sayers, C. M.2005. “Seismic Anisotropy of Shales.” Geophysical Prospecting53: 667–676.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Sayers, C. M.2010. “The Effect of Anisotropy on the Young's Moduli and Poisson's Ratios of Shales.” In 80th Annual International Meeting. SEG. Expanded Abstracts.
  51. Sayers, C. M.2013. “The Effect of Anisotropy of the Young's Moduli and Poisson's Ratios of Shales.” Geophysical Prospecting61: 416–426.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Sena, A., G.Castillo, K.Chesser, et al. 2011. “Seismic Reservoir Characterization in Resource Shale Plays: Stress Analysis and Sweet Spot Discrimination.” Leading Edge30: 758–764.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Sohail, G. M., Q.Yasin, A. E.Radwan, and M. Z.Emad. 2023. “Estimating Hardness and Young's Modulus of Shale Using Drill Cuttings: Implications for Hydraulic Fracturing in Shale Gas Reservoir Development.” Gas Science and Engineering118: 205116.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Stephen, H. A.2003. “The Increasing Role of Unconventional Reservoirs in the Future of the Oil and Gas Business.” Journal of Petroleum Technology55: 34–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Thomsen, L.1986. “Weak Elastic Anisotropy.” Geophysics51: 1954–1966.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Tillotson, P., J.Sothcott, A. I.Best, M.Chapman, and X. Y.Li. 2012. “Experimental Verification of the Fracture Density and Shear‐Wave Splitting Relationship Using Synthetic Silica Cemented Sandstones With a Controlled Fracture Geometry.” Geophysical Prospecting60: 516–525.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Vernik, L.1993. “Microcrack‐Induced Versus Intrinsic Elastic Anisotropy in Mature HC‐Source Shales.” Geophysics58: 1703–1706.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Wang, H., T.Han, and L.‐Y.Fu. 2025. “Understanding the Effects of Pore Pressure‐Induced Crack Deformation on the Acoustic Anisotropy of Rocks With Aligned Cracks.” Geophysical Prospecting73: 418–429.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Watanabe, T., and A.Higuchi. 2015. “Simultaneous Measurements of Elastic Wave Velocities and Electrical Conductivity in a Brine‐Saturated Granitic Rock Under Confining Pressures and Their Implication for Interpretation of Geophysical Observations.” Progress in Earth and Planetary Science2: 37.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Xie, J., J.Cao, D. R.Schmitt, et al. 2019. “Effects of Kerogen Content on Elastic Properties‐Based on Artificial Organic‐Rich Shale (AORS).” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth124: 12660–12678.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Xu, Y., F.Zhang, and X.Li. 2025. “A Stress‐Dependent Anisotropic Rock‐Physics Model for Shale With Bedding‐Parallel Cracks.” Geophysics90, no. 6: M261–M270.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Yan, H., T.Han, L.‐Y.Fu, and B.Li. 2022. “Pressure‐Dependent Joint Elastic‐Electrical Properties in Brine‐Saturated Artificial Sandstones With Aligned Penny‐Shaped Cracks—Part II: Theoretical Modelling.” Geophysical Journal International228, no. 2: 1083–1097.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Zou, C., D.Dong, S.Wang, et al. 2010. “Geological Characteristics and Resource Potential of Shale Gas in China.” Petroleum Exploration and Development37: 641–653.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70136
Loading
Pressure‐Dependent Anisotropic Elastic Properties of Cracked Artificial Shale With Varying Crack and Background Porosity
Geophysical Prospecting 74, e70136 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.70136
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70136
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.70136
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cracks; elastic anisotropy; pressure effects; shales; velocity analysis

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error