1887
Clinoforms and Clinothems: Fundamental Elements of Basin Infill
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2117

Abstract

[

Given steadily rising relative sea level, a deltaic clinoform grows in a nonequilibrium pattern. These nonequilibrium behaviours include autoretreat of the deltaic shoreline, autodrowning of the whole system, and autobreak of the deltaic sedimentation, all of which can be captured by the recently‐proposed grade index model. The regressive‐to‐transgressive threshold (i.e. the onset of autoretreat) is crossed when the delta plain’s dimensionless basal area (, which can be reflected by the dimensionless delta plain radius, *) encounters a critical value that is expressed in terms of grade index (): regression and transgression are sustained when is below and above the threshold, respectively. During transgression, the transgression mode depends on the slope conditions. If the hinterland slope (γ) is steeper than the foreset slope (β), both and decrease as the relative sea‐level rises. Eventually, the depositional system experiences autodrowning when = = 0. If γ < β; on the other hand, both and increase. This latter slope condition eventually causes autobreak of the deltaic sedimentation, afterward of which = = 1.

, Abstract

Grade index () is a dimensionless number given as the volume‐in‐unit‐time ratio of subaerial allocation to both subaerial and subaqueous allocations of sediment supplied to a delta from upstream. It was originally proposed for understanding the effect of basin water depth on the morphodynamics of delta distributary channels under stationary relative sea level. We here examine how rising relative sea level modulates the , using geometrical reasoning and numerical simulations. We find that the grade index model can account for autoretreat of the deltaic shoreline, autodrowning of the whole system, and autobreak of the deltaic sedimentation, all of which are the consequences of autogenic nonequilibrium responses to steadily rising relative sea level. The regressive‐to‐transgressive threshold (i.e. the onset of autoretreat) is crossed when the delta plain's dimensionless basal area () encounters a critical value that is expressed in terms of : regression and transgression are sustained when is below and above the threshold, respectively. The mode of transgression depends on the slope conditions. If the hinterland slope (γ) is steeper than the foreset slope (β), both and decrease as the relative sea‐level rises. Eventually, the depositional system experiences autodrowning when  =  = 0. If γ < β; on the other hand, both and increase. This latter slope condition eventually causes autobreak of the deltaic sedimentation, afterward of which  =  = 1. The grade index model is useful for interpreting and predicting the stratigraphic responses of natural deltaic clinoforms in conditions of rising relative sea level.

]
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/bre.12418
2019-11-02
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Burgess, P. M., Steel, R. J., & Granjeon, D. (2008) Stratigraphic forward modeling of basin‐margin clinoform systems: implications for controls on topset and shelf width and timing of formation of shelf‐edge deltas. In G. J.Hampson, R. J.Steel, P. M.Burgess, & R. W.Dalrymple (Eds.), Recent advances in models of siliciclastic shallow‐marine stratigraphy, Vol. 90 (pp. 35–45). Tulsa, OK: SEPM Spec. Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Carlson, B., Piliouras, A., Muto, T., & Kim, W. (2018). Basin water depth control on channel morphology and autogenic timescales in deltaic systems. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 88, 1026–1039.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kim, W., Mohrig, D., Twilley, R., Paola, C., & Parker, G. (2009). Is it feasible to build new land in the Mississippi River Delta?Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 90, 373–374. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009eo420001
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kim, W., Paola, C., Swenson, J. B., & Voller, V. R. (2006). Shoreline response to autogenic processes of sediment storage and release in the fluvial system. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, F04013. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JF000470
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Martin, J., Sheets, B., Paola, C., & Hoyal, D. (2009). Influence of steady base‐level rise on channel mobility, shoreline migration, and scaling properties of a cohesive experimental delta. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114, F03017. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001142
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Muto, T. (2001). Shoreline autoretreat substantiated in flume experiments. Journal of Geophysical Research, 71, 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1306/091400710246
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Muto, T., Furubayashi, R., Tomer, A., Sato, T., Kim, W., Naruse, H., & Parker, G. (2016a). Planform evolution of deltas with graded alluvial topsets: Insights from three‐dimensional tank experiments, geometric considerations and field applications. Sedimentology, 63, 2158–2189. https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12301
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Muto, T., & Steel, R. J. (1992). Retreat of the front in a prograding delta. Geology, 20, 967–970. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020<0967:ROTFIA>2.3.CO;2
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Muto, T., & Steel, R. J. (2001). Autostepping during the transgressive growth of deltas: Results from flume experiments. Geology, 29, 771–774. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0771:ADTTGO>2.0.CO;2
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Muto, T., Steel, R. J., & Burgess, P. (2016b). Contributions to sequence stratigraphy from analogue and numerical experiments. Journal of the Geological Society, 173, 837–844. https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2015-127
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Muto, T., Steel, R. J., & Swenson, J. B. (2007). Autostratigraphy: A framework norm for genetic stratigraphy. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 77, 2–12. https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2007.005
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Olariu, C. (2014) Autogenic process change in modern deltas. In A. W.Martinius, R.Ravnås, J. A.Howell, R. J.Steel, & J. P.Wonham (Eds.), From depositional systems to sedimentary successions on the Norwegian continental margin, Vol. 46 (pp. 149–166). Chichester, West Sussex: Int. Assoc. Sedimentol. Spec. Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Parker, G., Muto, T., Akamatsu, Y., Dietrich, W. E., & Lauer, J. (2008). Unravelling the conundrum of river response to rising sea‐level from laboratory to field. Part II: The Fly‐Strickland River system, Papua New Guinea. Sedimentology, 55, 1657–1686. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2008.00962.x
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Parker, G., & Sequeiros, O. (2006). Large scale river morphodynamics: application to the Mississippi delta. In R. M. L.Ferreira, E. C. T. L.Alves, J. G. A. B.Leal, & A. H.Cardoso (Eds.), River Flow 2006, Vol. 1 (pp. 3–11). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Patruno, S., & Helland‐Hansen, W. (2018). Clinoform systems: Review and dynamic classification scheme for shorelines, subaqueous deltas, shelf edges and continental margins. Earth‐Science Reviews, 185, 202–233.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Prior, D. B., & Bornhold, B. D. (1989). Submarine sedimentation on a developing Holocene fan delta. Sedimentology, 36, 1053–1076. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1989.tb01542.x
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Swenson, J., Voller, V., Paola, C., Parker, G., & Marr, J. (2000). Fluvio‐deltaic sedimentation: A generalized Stefan problem. European Journal of Applied Mathematics, 11, 433–452.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Tomer, A., Muto, T., & Kim, W. (2011). Autogenic hiatus in fluviodeltaic successions: Geometrical modeling and physical experiments. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 81, 207–217. https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2011.19
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, J., Muto, T., Urata, K., Sato, T., & Naruse, H. (2019). Morphodynamics of river deltas in response to different basin water depths: An experimental examination of the grade index model. Geophysical Research Letters, 46, 5265–5273. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082483
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/bre.12418
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/bre.12418
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): autostratigraphy; basin configuration; modelling; sea‐level; sediment flux; sedimentology

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error