1887
Volume 35, Issue 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2117
PDF

Abstract

[

Challenges and opportunities for subsurface storage in the different salt structures described in this study.

, Abstract

Halite beds in the upper Permian Zechstein Group represent an opportunity for the future development of underground storage caverns. However, geological factors such as lithological heterogeneities, cap rock characteristics and depth can affect the sealing capacity and the integrity of the cavern or contaminate the stored fluid. The main objective of this paper is to evaluate these factors focusing on the compositional variation of the Zechstein Group in different salt structures in the Norwegian North Sea, and related opportunities and challenges for salt cavern storage. Based on deformation style, geometry, height and thickness of the salt structures, we have divided the Zechstein Group into four main categories: (1) thin beds, which can be either carbonate‐anhydrite or clastic dominated. Halite is absent and therefore there is no potential for the development of salt caverns. (2 and 3) bedded to weakly deformed evaporites and intermediate size salt structures, where thick halite beds of more than 300 m are present, but they are usually deeper than 2000 m. Lithological heterogeneities in the halite consist of a mix of competent and incompetent (K‐Mg salts) lithologies. (4) Tall diapirs, characterized by shallower structures (<2000 m), with large deformation and poor seismic image. Thin layers of incompetent K‐Mg salts are observed in these diapirs. The composition, thickness and deformation of the cap rock vary greatly in the area. Thick halite beds are recognized in most salt structures, suggesting an opportunity for underground storage. The challenges are related to the depth of the halite, amount and type of heterogeneities, characteristics of the cap rock and deformation in the different salt structures. These results also have implications for the distribution of reservoir and source rocks, and the evolution of the Northern Permian Basin.

]
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/bre.12761
2023-07-17
2026-02-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/bre/35/4/bre12761.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1111/bre.12761&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Allsop, C., Yfantis, G., Passaris, E., & Edlmann, K. (2023). Utilising publicly available datasets for identifying offshore salt strata and developing salt caverns for hydrogen storage. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 528(1), SP528‐2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Caesar, K., Kyle, J., Lyons, T., Tripati, A., & Loyd, S. (2019). Carbonate formation in salt dome cap rocks by microbial anaerobic oxidation of methane. Nature Communications, 10, 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Caglayan, D. G., Weber, N., Heinrichs, H. U., Linßen, J., Robinius, M., Kukla, P. A., & Stolten, D. (2020). Technical potential of salt caverns for hydrogen storage in Europe. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45, 6793–6805.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark, J., Cartwright, J., & Stewart, S. (1999). Mesozoic dissolution tectonics on the west central shelf, UK Central North Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 16, 283–300.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark, J., Stewart, S., & Cartwright, J. (1998). Evolution of the NW margin of the north Permian Basin, UK North Sea. Journal of the Geological Society, 155, 663–676.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Coelewij, P., & Kuijk, V. (1978). Magnesium‐salt exploration in the northeastern Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences/Geologie en Mijnbouw, 57(4), 487–502.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Crotogino, F. (2016) Traditional bulk energy storage—Coal and underground natural gas and oil storage. In LetcherT.M. (Ed.), Storing energy (pp. 633–649). Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cyran, K. (2020). Insight into a shape of salt storage caverns. Archives of Mining Sciences, 65, 363–398.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Davison, I., Alsop, G., Evans, N., & Safaricz, M. (2000). Overburden deformation patterns and mechanisms of salt Diapir penetration in the central graben, North Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 17, 601–618.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Duffy, O. B., Gawthorpe, R. L., Docherty, M., & Brocklehurst, S. H. (2013). Mobile Evaporite controls on the structural style and evolution of rift basins: Danish Central Graben, North Sea. Basin Research, 25, 310–330.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Duffy, O. B., Moscardelli, L., Hudec, M. R., Dooley, T. P., Peel, F., Looff, K., Apps, G., & Shuster, M. W. (2022). Potential controls on the origin, nature and distribution of shear zones in salt stocks: Salt tectonic insights with a solution mining perspective. Solution Mining Research Institute, Technical Conference, 26 p.
  12. Elliott, G. M., Jackson, C. A. L., Gawthorpe, R. L., Wilson, P., Sharp, I. R., & Michelsen, L. (2021). Tectono‐stratigraphic development of a salt‐influenced rift margin: Halten terrace, offshore mid‐Norway. Basin Research, 33, 3295–3320.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Giles, K. A., Rowan, M. G., Langford, R., & Hearon, T. (2018). Salt shoulders. AAPG Search and Discovery Article, 30554, 22 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gillhaus, A., & Horvath, P. (2008). Compilation of geological and geotechnical data of worldwide Domal salt deposits and Domal salt cavern fields. Solution Mining Research Insitute and KBB Underground Technologies GmbH, Clarks Summit, PA, USA, 201 p.
  15. Glennie, K., Higham, J., Stemmerik, L., Evans, D., Graham, C., Armour, A., & Bathurst, P. (2003). Permian. The millennium atlas: Petroleum geology of the central and northern North Sea. Geological Society, London, 91, 90–103.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Glennie, K., & Underhill, J. (1998). Origin, development and evolution of structural styles. Petroleum Geology of the North Sea: Basic Concepts and Recent Advances, 42–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gregorowicz, J., Peters, C., De Swaan Arons, J., Friedrichs, G., & Jaeschke, M. (1996). Phenomena related to the storage of natural gas in Underground Caverns. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 117, 249–256.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hemme, C., & Van Berk, W. (2017). Potential risk of H2s generation and release in salt cavern gas storage. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 47, 114–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jackson, C. A., & Lewis, M. M. (2013). Physiography of the NE margin of the Permian Salt Basin: New insights from 3D seismic reflection data. Journal of the Geological Society, 170(6), 857–860.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jackson, C. A. L., Elliott, G. M., Royce‐Rogers, E., Gawthorpe, R. L., & Aas, T. E. (2019). Salt thickness and composition influence rift structural style, northern North Sea, offshore Norway. Basin Research, 31, 514–538.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jackson, C. A. L., & Lewis, M. M. (2016). Structural style and evolution of a salt‐influenced Rift Basin margin; the impact of variations in salt composition and the role of Polyphase extension. Basin Research, 28, 81–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jackson, C. A.‐L., & Lewis, M. M. (2012). Origin of an anhydrite sheath encircling a salt Diapir and implications for the seismic imaging of steep‐sided salt structures, Egersund Basin, northern North Sea. Journal of the Geological Society, 169, 593–599.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Jackson, C.‐L. & Stewart, S. (2017) Composition, tectonics, and hydrocarbon significance of Zechstein Supergroup salt on the United Kingdom and Norwegian continental shelves: A review. Permo‐Triassic Salt Provinces of Europe, North Africa and the Atlantic Margins (pp. 175–201).
  24. Jackson, M. P., & Hudec, M. R. (2017). Salt tectonics: Principles and practice. Cambridge University Press 498 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jones, I. F., & Davison, I. (2014). Seismic imaging in and around salt bodies. Interpretation, 2, SL1–SL20.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kairanov, B., Escalona, A., Norton, I., & Abrahamson, P. (2021). Early Cretaceous evolution of the Tromsø Basin, SW Barents Sea, Norway. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 123, 104714.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kalani, M., Faleide, J. I., & Gabrielsen, R. H. (2020). Paleozoic‐Mesozoic Tectono‐sedimentary evolution and magmatism of the Egersund Basin area, Norwegian Central North Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 122, 104642.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kane, K. E., Jackson, C. A.‐L., & Larsen, E. (2010). Normal fault growth and fault‐related folding in a salt‐influenced Rift Basin: South Viking graben, offshore Norway. Journal of Structural Geology, 32, 490–506.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Karlo, J. F., Van Buchem, F. S., Moen, J., & Milroy, K. (2014). Triassic‐age salt tectonics of the Central North Sea. Interpretation, 2, SM19–SM28.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Koyi, H. A. (2001). Modeling the influence of sinking anhydrite blocks on salt Diapirs targeted for hazardous waste disposal. Geology, 29, 387–390.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kruck, O., Crotogino, F., Prelicz, R., & Rudolph, T. (2013). Assessment of the potential, the actors and relevant business cases for large scale and seasonal storage of renewable electricity by hydrogen underground storage in Europe. KBB Undergr. Technol. GmbH 94 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kumar, K., Makhmutov, A., Spiers, C. J., & Hajibeygi, H. (2021). Geomechanical simulation of energy storage in salt formations. Scientific Reports, 11, 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kupfer, D. H. (1968). Relationship of internal to external structure of salt domes. AAPG Memoir, 8, 79–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Le Comte, P. (1965). Creep in rock salt. The Journal of Geology, 73, 469–484.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lewis, M. M., Jackson, C. A.‐L., & Gawthorpe, R. L. (2013). Salt‐influenced Normal fault growth and forced folding: The Stavanger fault system, North Sea. Journal of Structural Geology, 54, 156–173.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Looff, K. (2017). The impact of anomalous salt and boundary shear zones on salt cavern geometry, cavern operations, and cavern integrity. Proc. SMRI Spring Meeting, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 31 p.
  37. Looff, K., Duffield, J. & Looff, K. (2003). Edge of salt definition for salt domes and other deformed salt structures—Geologic and geophysical considerations. SMRI Spring Technical Conference, Citeseer, 20 p.
  38. Merey, S. (2019). Prediction of pressure and temperature changes in the salt caverns of Tuz Golu underground natural gas storage site while withdrawing or injecting natural gas by numerical simulations. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 12, 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. NPD . (2022). Norwegian Petroleum Directorate Factpages. http://factpages.npd.no/factpages/Default.aspx?culture=en
  40. Ozarslan, A. (2012). Large‐scale hydrogen energy storage in salt caverns. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37, 14265–14277.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Panfilov, M. (2016). Underground and pipeline hydrogen storage. In R. B.Gupta, A.Basile, & T. N.Veziroglu (Eds.), Compendium of hydrogen energy (pp. 91–115). Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Parkes, D., Evans, D., Williamson, P., & Williams, J. (2018). Estimating available salt volume for potential Caes development: A case study using the Northwich halite of the Cheshire Basin. Journal of Energy Storage, 18, 50–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Pedersen, J. H., Karlsen, D. A., Lie, J. E., Brunstad, H., & Di Primio, R. (2006). Maturity and source‐rock potential of Palaeozoic sediments in the NW European northern Permian Basin. Petroleum Geoscience, 12, 13–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Pichat, A. (2022). Stratigraphy, paleogeography and depositional setting of the K–Mg salts in the Zechstein Group of Netherlands—Implications for the development of salt caverns. Minerals, 12, 486.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Portarapillo, M., & Di Benedetto, A. (2021). Risk assessment of the large‐scale hydrogen storage in salt caverns. Energies, 14, 2856.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Posey, H. H., & Kyle, J. R. (1988). Fluid‐rock interactions in the salt dome environment: An introduction and review. Chemical Geology, 74, 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Raith, A., Urai, J., Strozyk, F., & Visser, J. (2015). Evolution of Rheologically heterogeneous salt structures: A case study from the northeast of The Netherlands. Solid Earth Discussions, 7, 1877–1908.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Reitenbach, V., Ganzer, L., Albrecht, D., & Hagemann, B. (2015). Influence of added hydrogen on underground gas storage: A review of key issues. Environmental Earth Sciences, 73, 6927–6937.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Roca, E., Ferrer, O., Rowan, M. G., Muñoz, J. A., Butillé, M., Giles, K. A., Arbués, P., & De Matteis, M. (2021). Salt tectonics and controls on Halokinetic‐sequence development of an exposed Deepwater Diapir: The Bakio Diapir, Basque‐Cantabrian Basin, Pyrenees. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 123, 104770.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Rojo, L. A., & Escalona, A. (2018). Controls on Minibasin infill in the Nordkapp Basin: Evidence of complex Triassic Synsedimentary deposition influenced by salt tectonics. AAPG Bulletin, 102, 1239–1272.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Rojo, L. A., Marín, D., Cardozo, N., Escalona, A., & Koyi, H. (2020). The influence of Halokinesis on Prograding Clinoforms: Insights from the Tiddlybanken Basin, Norwegian Barents Sea. Basin Research, 32, 979–1004.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Rowan, M. G., Urai, J. L., Fiduk, J. C., & Kukla, P. A. (2019). Deformation of Intrasalt competent layers in different modes of salt tectonics. Solid Earth, 10, 987–1013.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Smith, R., Hodgson, N., & Fulton, M. (1993). Salt control on Triassic reservoir distribution. In J. R.Parker (Ed.), Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe: Proceedings of the 4th Conference (pp. 547–557). Geological Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Sørensen, S., Morizot, H., & Skottheim, S. (1992). A tectonostratigraphic analysis of the southeast Norwegian North Sea Basin. In R. M.Larsen, H.Brekke, B. T.Larsen, & E.Talleraas (Eds.), Structural and tectonic modelling and its application to petroleum geology (pp. 19–42). Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Sorento, T., Stemmerik, L., & Olaussen, S. (2018). Upper Permian carbonates at the northern edge of the Zechstein Basin, Utsira high, Norwegian North Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 89, 635–652.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Stewart, S. (2007). Salt tectonics in the North Sea Basin: A structural style template for seismic interpreters. Special Publication‐Geological Society of London, 272, 361–396.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Stewart, S., & Clark, J. (1999). Impact of salt on the structure of the Central North Sea hydrocarbon fairways. In A. J.Fleet & S. A. R.Boldy (Eds.), Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe: Proceedings of the 5th Conference (pp. 179–200). Geological Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Strozyk, F. (2017). The internal structure of the Zechstein salt and related drilling risks in the northern Netherlands. In J. I.Soto, J. F.Flinch, & G.Tari (Eds.), Permo‐Triassic Salt Provinces of Europe, North Africa and the Atlantic Margins (pp. 115–128). Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Szymaniak, T., & Schäfer, M. (2002). Geologisch‐Tektonische Kartierung Der Salzstruktur Asse Im Subhercynen Becken. Technische Universität Clausthal, Institut für Geologie und Paläontologie: Clausthal‐Zellerfeld, Germany.
  60. Tarkowski, R. (2019). Underground hydrogen storage: Characteristics and prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 105, 86–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Tarkowski, R., & Czapowski, G. (2018). Salt Domes in Poland–Potential Sites for Hydrogen Storage in Caverns. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43, 21414–21427.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Taylor, J. (1998). Upper Permian—Zechstein. In K. W.Glennie (Ed.), Petroleum Geology of the North Sea: Basic concepts and recent advances (pp. 174–211). Blackwell Science Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Urai, J., & Spiers, C. (2007). The effect of grain boundary water on deformation mechanisms and rheology of Rocksalt during long‐term deformation. In M.Wallner, K.Lux, W.Minkley, & H.Hardy, Jr. (Eds.), The mechanical behavior of salt–Understanding of THMC Processes in Salt (pp. 149–158). CRC Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Van Adrichem Boogaert, H., & Kouwe, W. (1993). Stratigraphic nomenclature of The Netherlands, Revision and Update by Rgd and Nogepa. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst, 50, 40 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Van Gent, H., Urai, J. L., & De Keijzer, M. (2011). The internal geometry of salt structures—A first look using 3d seismic data from the Zechstein of The Netherlands. Journal of Structural Geology, 33, 292–311.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Warren, J. K. (2006). Evaporites: Sediments, resources and hydrocarbons. Springer Science & Business Media 1041 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Warren, J. K. (2018). Well (wireline) log interpretation of evaporates: An overview. https://www.saltworkconsultants.com/archive‐salty‐matters/
  68. Yang, C., Jing, W., Daemen, J. J., Zhang, G., & Du, C. (2013). Analysis of major risks associated with hydrocarbon storage caverns in bedded salt rock. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 113, 94–111.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/bre.12761
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/bre.12761
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): North Sea; salt caverns; underground storage; Zechstein group

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error