1887
Volume 37, Issue 5
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2117

Abstract

[

The diagram on the left is a section view illustrating the centroid concept, whereby a permeable lithology (yellow, sand) can facilitate fluid escape from low permeability host mudstones (grey). The cartoon section on the right illustrates the location of focused fluid escape along injectites (in red) that straddles a primary overpressure zone.

, ABSTRACT

High impedance (hard) mudstones are sometimes observed in association with sand injection complexes in the Paleogene petroleum province of the northern North Sea. A hard mudstone surrounding a water‐bearing sandstone can give a similar acoustic response to an oil‐bearing sandstone surrounded by low impedance (soft) mudstone. The presence of hard mudstone thus impacts the ability to predict hydrocarbon presence directly from seismic data during exploration. To establish the mechanism of ‘hardening’ to better predict the presence of variable mudstone characteristics, we examine three cored wells from the Beryl Embayment. Well logs and core were examined to characterise the structure, petrology, petrophysical properties and spatial distribution of both hard and soft mudstones. The results indicate that mudstone hardening is most likely associated with mechanical compaction and efficient dewatering of mudstones into the sand injection complex. This process is enhanced where sand injection complexes transect primary overpressure zones, that promote dewatering from basal overpressured mudstone into the injection network. This study highlights that seismic response needs careful investigation in the context of the complexity of the injectite complex along with variable mudstone attributes. Additionally, this process highlights the role sand injection complexes play in efficient dewatering through lateral transfer in overpressured basins.

]
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/bre.70058
2025-09-05
2025-11-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/bre/37/5/bre70058.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1111/bre.70058&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ahmadi, Z. M., M.Sawyers, S.Kenyon‐Roberts, et al. 2003. “Paleocene.” In The Millennium Atlas: Petroleum Geology of the Central and Northern North Sea, edited by D.Evans, C.Graham, A.Armour, and P.Bathurst, 235–259. Geological Society of London.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bruce, B., and G.Bowers. 2002. “Pore Pressure Terminology.” Leading Edge21, no. 2: 170–173.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cartwright, J., M.Huuse, and A.Aplin. 2007. “Seal Bypass Systems.” AAPG Bulletin91, no. 8: 1141–1166.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cartwright, J., D.James, M.Huuse, W.Vetel, and A.Hurst. 2008. “The Geometry and Emplacement of Conical Sandstone Intrusions.” Journal of Structural Geology30, no. 7: 854–867.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Castagna, J. P., H. W.Swan, and D. J.Foster. 1998. “Framework for AVO Gradient and Intercept Interpretation.” Geophysics63, no. 3: 948–956.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Davudov, D., R. G.Moghanloo, and Y.Lan. 2018. “Evaluation of Accessible Porosity Using Mercury Injection Capillary Pressure Data in Mudstone Samples.” Energy & Fuels32, no. 4: 4682–4694.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hou, X., Y.He, and B. T.Jones. 2004. “Recent Advances in Portable X‐Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry.” Applied Spectroscopy Reviews39, no. 1: 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hurst, A., J.Cartwright, M.Huuse, et al. 2003. “Significance of Large‐Scale Sand Injectites as Long‐Term Fluid Conduits: Evidence From Seismic Data.” Geofluids3, no. 4: 263–274.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hurst, A., R.van Oorschot, A.Grippa, and G.Palladino. 2025. “Identification of Sand Injectite Facies in Core: Their Significance to Developing a Reservoir Model for the Chestnut Oilfield, UK Continental Shelf.” In Geological Society, London, Energy Geoscience Conference Series, vol. 1, No. 1, pp. egc1‐2024. Geological Society of London.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Huuse, M., D.Duranti, N.Steinsland, et al. 2004. “Seismic Characteristics of Large‐Scale Sandstone Intrusions in the Paleogene of the South Viking Graben, UK and Norwegian North Sea.” Geological Society, London, Memoirs29: 263–278.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ibanez, W. D., and A. K.Kronenberg. 1993. “Experimental Deformation of Shale: Mechanical Properties and Microstructural Indicators of Mechanisms.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts30, no. 7: 723–734.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones, E., R.Jones, C.Ebdon, et al. 2003. “Eocene.” In The Millennium Atlas: Petroleum Geology of the Central and Northern North Sea, edited by D.Evans, C.Graham, A.Armour, and P.Bathurst, 261–277. Geological Society of London.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jonk, R.2010. “Sand‐Rich Injectites in the Context of Short‐Lived and Long‐Lived Fluid Flow.” Basin Research22, no. 4: 603–621.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jonk, R., K. M.Bohacs, and J. S.Davis. 2022. “Evaluating Top Seals Within a Sequence‐Stratigraphic Framework: Impact on Geological Carbon Sequestration.” Marine and Petroleum Geology146: 105920.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jonk, R., D.Duranti, J.Parnell, A.Hurst, and A. E.Fallick. 2003. “The Structural and Diagenetic Evolution of Injected Sandstones: Examples From the Kimmeridgian of NE Scotland.” Journal of the Geological Society160, no. 6: 881–894.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jonk, R., A.Hurst, D.Duranti, J.Parnell, A.Mazzini, and A. E.Fallick. 2005. “Origin and Timing of Sand Injection, Petroleum Migration, and Diagenesis in Tertiary Reservoirs, South Viking Graben, North Sea.” AAPG Bulletin89, no. 3: 329–357.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jonk, R., J.Parnell, and A.Hurst. 2005. “Aqueous and Petroleum Fluid Flow Associated With Sand Injectites.” Basin Research17, no. 2: 241–257.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Milliken, K.2014. “A Compositional Classification for Grain Assemblages in Fine‐Grained Sediments and Sedimentary Rocks.” Journal of Sedimentary Research84, no. 12: 1185–1199.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Moss, B., D.Barson, K.Rakhit, H.Dennis, and R.Swarbrick. 2003. “Formation Pore Pressures and Formation Waters.” In The Millennium Atlas: Petroleum Geology of the Central and Northern North Sea, edited by D.Evans, C.Graham, A.Armour, and P.Bathurst, 317–329. Geological Society of London.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mourgues, R., J. B.Gressier, L.Bodet, D.Bureau, and A.Gay. 2011. ““Basin Scale” Versus “Localized” Pore Pressure/Stress Coupling–Implications for Trap Integrity Evaluation.” Marine and Petroleum Geology28, no. 5: 1111–1121.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Osborne, M. J., and R. E.Swarbrick. 1997. “Mechanisms for Generating Overpressure in Sedimentary Basins: A Reevaluation.” AAPG Bulletin81, no. 6: 1023–1041.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Pernin, N., L.Feuilleaubois, T.Bird, and C.Reiser. 2022. “Identifying and De‐Risking Near‐Field Opportunities Through Reliable Pre‐Stack Broadband Attributes: Examples From the Paleocene North Sea (UK–Norway) Injectites Play.” In Cross‐Border Themes in Petroleum Geology I: The North Sea, edited by S.Patruno, S. G.Archer, D.Chiarella, J. A.Howell, C. A.‐L.Jackson, and H.Kombrink. Geological Society London Special Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Purvis, K., J.Kao, K.Flanagan, J.Henderson, and D.Duranti. 2002. “Complex Reservoir Geometries in a Deep Water Clastic Sequence, Gryphon Field, UKCS: Injection Structures, Geological Modelling and Reservoir Simulation.” Marine and Petroleum Geology19, no. 2: 161–179.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Robertson, J., N. R.Goulty, and R. E.Swarbrick. 2013. “Overpressure Distributions in Palaeogene Reservoirs of the UK Central North Sea and Implications for Lateral and Vertical Fluid Flow.” Petroleum Geoscience19, no. 3: 223–236.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Satur, N., and A.Hurst. 2025. “The Value of Outcrops in Understanding the Complexities of Sand Intrusion Reservoirs: Learnings From the Volund Field.” Basin Research37, no. 2: e70025.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Simm, R.2017. “A ‘Sense Check’ Method for Incorporating Seismic Amplitude Information Into Prospect Risk (a Tribute to Mike Bacon).” First Break35, no. 10: 45–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Szarawarska, E., M.Huuse, A.Hurst, et al. 2010. “Three‐Dimensional Seismic Characterisation of Large‐Scale Sandstone Intrusions in the Lower Palaeogene of the North Sea: Completely Injected vs. In Situ Remobilised Sandbodies.” Basin Research22, no. 4: 517–532.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Templeton, G., P. T.King, and M. L.Reeder. 2002. “Leadon Field‐Description of Frigg Reservoir Sand Injection Structures.” In 64th EAGE Conference & Exhibition (pp. cp‐5). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Vigorito, M., and A.Hurst. 2010. “Regional Sand Injectite Architecture as a Record of Pore‐Pressure Evolution and Sand Redistribution in the Shallow Crust: Insights From the Panoche Giant Injection Complex, California.” Journal of the Geological Society167, no. 5: 889–904.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Vigorito, M., A.Hurst, A. J.Scott, O.Stanzione, and A.Grippa. 2022. “A Giant Sand Injection Complex: Processes and Implications for Basin Evolution and Subsurface Fluid Flow.” American Journal of Science322, no. 6: 729–794.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Waltham, R. J., G.Zvirtes, B. S.Burnham, and A.Hurst. 2025. “Geometric and Spatial Analysis of Wing‐Like Intrusions as Outcrop Analogues for Subsurface Analysis.” Basin Research37, no. 3: e70036.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Yardley, G. S., and R. E.Swarbrick. 2000. “Lateral Transfer: A Source of Additional Overpressure?” Marine and Petroleum Geology17, no. 4: 523–537.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1111/bre.70058
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/bre.70058
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error