1887
Volume 17, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2117

Abstract

Abstract

Commercial three‐dimensional (3D) seismic surveys now cover much of the continental slope and basin floor areas of the Faroe‐Shetland Channel. A mosaic of the seabed picks derived from these data sets and enhancement with visualisation techniques has resulted in detailed relief images of the seabed that testify to the action of a number of sedimentary processes such as glaciation, downslope and alongslope processes. The wealth of detail in these images is remarkable and extremely valuable for the identification and interpretation of seabed features. However, the level of detail can seduce the interpreter into treating the image purely as an aerial photograph. The interpreter needs to understand the limitations and artefacts inherent in such images to use them appropriately. This paper will present the major artefacts observed in the images and how certain aspects of 3D seismic survey acquisition and processing have contributed to their presence. The vertical and horizontal resolution of the images will also be discussed. Although primarily focused on seabed imagery these comments are equally pertinent to the application of 3D seismic surveys for shallower objectives than for which they were primarily designed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2005.00253.x
2005-02-16
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AFEN
    AFEN (2000) Atlantic margin environmental surveys of the seafloor 1996 & 1998 (CD‐ROM). Atlantic Frontier Environmental Network (AFEN). United Kingdom Offshore Operators Association (UKOOA).
  2. Austin, B., Ayers, S. & Douglas, G. (2004) Integrated use of 3D seismic in field development, engineering and drilling – examples from the shallow section. In: 3D Seismic Technoloy: Application to the Exploration of Sedimentary Basins (Ed. by R.J.Davies , J.A.Cartwright , S.A.Stewart , M.Lappin & J.R.Underhill ), Geol. Soc. Lond., Mem., 29, 279–296.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berkhout, A.J. (1984) Seismic resolution. In: Handbook of Geophysical Exploration, vol. 1. Geophysical Press, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, A.R. (1996) The interpretation of Three‐Dimensional Seismic Data. AAPG Memoir 42, 4th edn. AAPG, Tulsa.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bulat, J. (2000) Compilation of seabed image maps of the Faroe‐Shetland Channel using WFA and GEM data sets. British Geological Survey Technical Report, CR/00/41.
  6. Bulat, J. (2003a) Imaging the Afen Slide from commercial 3D seismic–methodology and comparisons with high resolution data. In: Submarine Mass Movements and their Consequences. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research Series (Ed. by J.Locat & J.Mienert ), pp. 205–213. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bulat, J. (2003b) A study of reflection amplitudes of the seabed in the Faroe‐Shetland Channel derived from commercial 3D seismic surveys. British Geological Survey Technical Report, CR/03/127.
  8. Bulat, J. & Long, D. (1998) Creation of seabed feature maps from 3D seismic horizon data sets. British Geological Survey Technical Report, WB/98/38C.
  9. Bulat, J. & Long, D. (2001) Images of the seabed in the Faroe‐Shetland Channel from commercial 3D seismic data. Mar. Geophys. Res., 22, 345–367.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Canning, A. & Gardner, G.H.F. (1998) Reducing 3‐D acquisition footprint for 3‐D DMO and 3‐D prestack migration. Geophysics, 63, 1177–1183.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, J. & Schuster, G.T. (1999) Resolution limits of migrated images. Geophysics, 64, 1046–1053.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cook, P., Jayson, D., Nichols, P.J., Ellis, D.W. & Zwaan, J. (2002) Quantifying geohazards through advanced visualisations and integration in the Terang‐Sirasun development. Kangean PSC, Indonesia. In: Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics: Diversity and Sustainability. Proceedings of an International Conference, pp. 285–297. Society for Underwater Technology, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Davies, R.J., Cartwright, J.A., Stewart, S.A., Lappin, M. & Underhill J, R. (2004) 3D seismic technoloy: application to the exploration of sedimentary basins. Geol. Soc. Lond., Mem., 29, 1–353.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dewhurst, D.N., Cartright, J.A. & Lonergan, L. (1999) The development of polygonal fault systems by syneresis of colloidal sediments. Mar. Pet. Geol., 16, 793–810.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Drummond, D., Budd, A.J.L. & Ryan, J.W. (2000) Adapting to noisy 3D data – attenuating the acquisition footprint. Extended Abstracts Soc. Explo. Geophys. Annual Meeting, Calgary, 2000.
  16. Goulty, N.R. (1997) Lateral resolution of 2D seismic illustrated by a real data example. First Break, 15, 77–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hill, S., Schultz, M. & Brewer, J. (1999) Acquisition footprint and fold‐of‐stack plots. Leading Edge, June, 18, 686–695.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Knutz, P.C. & Cartwright, J.A. (2004) 3D anatomy of Neogene contourite drifts and associated mass flows in the Faroe‐Shetland Channel. In: 3D Seismic Technoloy: Application to the Exploration of Sedimentary Basins (Ed. by R.J.Davies , J.A.Cartwright , S.A.Stewart , M.Lappin & J.R.Underhill ), Geol. Soc., Lond., Mem., 29, 63–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lansley, W. (1996) Considerations for optimum 3‐D survey design, acquisition and processing. In: The Interpretation of Three‐dimensional Seismic Data, 4th edn, (Ed. by A.R.Brown ), AAPG Mem. (AAPG, Appendix A), 42, 397–402.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Leslie, A., Wilson, C.K., Long, D., Bulat, J. & Stoker, M.S. (2004) Ground‐truthing sea bed morphology and amplitude features on the west shetland margin. British Geological Survey Technical Report, CR/04/060.
  21. Lindsey, J.P. (1989) The Fresnel zone and its interpretive significance. Leading Edge, 8 (10), 33–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Long, D, Bulat, J. & Stoker, M.S. (2004) Sea bed morphology of the Faroe‐Shetland Channel derived from 3D seismic data sets. In: 3D Seismic Technoloy: Application to the Exploration of Sedimentary Basins (Ed. by R.J.Davies , J.A.Cartwright , S.A.Stewart , M.Lappin & J.R.Underhill ), Geol. Soc., Lond., Mem., 29, 53–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lonergan, L., Cartwright, J. & Jolly, R. (1998) The geometry of polygonal fault systems in tertiary mudrocks of the North Sea. J. Struct. Geol., 20, 529–548.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Marfurt, K.J., Scheet, R.M., Sharp, J.A. & Harper, M.G. (1998) Suppression of the acquisition footprint for seismic sequence attribute mapping. Geophysics, 62, 1774–1778.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Masson, D.G. (2001) Sedimentary processes shaping the eastern margin of the Faroe‐Shetland Channel. Cont. Shelf Res., 21, 825–857.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Miller, R.D., Anderson, N.L., Feldman, H.R. & Franseen, E.K. (1995) Vertical resolution of a seismic survey in stratigraphic sequences less than 100 m deep in southeastern Kansas. Geophysics, 60, 423–430.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Okoye, P.N. & Uren, N.F. (2000) Fresnel zones and spatial resolution for P‐ and SH‐waves in transversely isotropic media. Geophysics, 65, 1168–1178.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Paul, M.A., Talbot, L.A. & Stoker, M.S. (1993) Geotechnical properties of sediments from the continental slope northwest of the British Isles. In: Offshore Site Investigation and Foundation Behaviour, 28, pp. 77–106. Society of Underwater Technology, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Praeg, D. (2003) Seismic imaging of mid‐Pleistocene tunnel‐valleys in the North Sea Basin – high resolution from low frequencies. J. Appl. Geophys., 53, 273–298.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Safar, M.H. (1985) On the lateral resolution achieved by Kirchhoff migration. Geophysics, 50, 1091–1099.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Von Seggern, D. (1991) Spatial resolution of acoustic imaging with born approximation. Geophysics, 56, 1185–1202.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Steffens, G.S., Shipp, R.C., Prather, B.E., Nott, J.A., Gibson, J.L. & Winkler, C.D. (2001) The use of near‐surface 3D seismic data in deepwater exploration and production. Extended Abstracts, Geological Society London International Conference on 3D Seismic, 14–16 November 2001.
  33. Stolt, R.H. & Benson, A.F. (1986) Seismic Migration – theory and Practice. Geophysical Press, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Stoker, M.S. (1999) Stratigraphic Nomenclature of the UK North West Margin. 3. Mid–to Late Cenozoic Stratigraphy. British Geological Survey, Edinburgh.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Stoker, M.S., Long, D. & Bulat, J. (2003) A record of mid‐Cainozoic strong deep‐water erosion in the Faroe‐Shetland Channel. In: European Contiental Margin Sedimentary Processes: An Atlas of Side‐Scan Sonar and Seismic Images (Ed. by J.Mienert & P.Weaver ), pp. 145–148. Springer, Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Turrel, W.R., Slesser, G., Adams, R.D., Paynes, R. & Gillibrand, P.A. (1999) Decadal variability in the composition of Faroe Shetland Channel bottom water. Deep Sea Res., 46, 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Vermeer, G.J.O. (1999) Factors affecting spatial resolution. Geophysics, 64, 942–953.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Widess, M.B. (1973) How thin is a thin bed?Geophysics, 38, 1176–1180.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Wilson, C.K., Bulat, J. & Long, D. (2002) The Afen Slide. British Geological Survey Technical Report, CR/02/291.
  40. Wilson, C.K., Long, D. & Bulat, J. (2003) The Afen Slide – a multistage slope failure in the Faroe–Shetland Channel. In: Submarine Mass Movements and their Consequences. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research Series (Ed. by J.Locat & J.Mienert ), pp. 317–324. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Yilmaz, O. (2001) Seismic data analysis, processing, inversion and interpretation of seismic data. In: Investigations in Geophysics Series No. 1 (Ed. by S.M.Doherty ) Soc. Explo. Geophys, Tulsa.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2005.00253.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2005.00253.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error