1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Basin Research
  4. Volume 17, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 17, Issue 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2117

Abstract

ABSTRACT

A cap rock's capacity to seal hydrocarbons depends on its wettability and the sizes of the pore throats within the interconnected pore system that the leaking hydrocarbons must penetrate. These critical pore throat sizes are often poorly constrained in hydrocarbon exploration, partly because measurements of pore throat sizes have not been performed, and partly because pore throat measurements on a few individual samples in the cap rock may not be representative for the seal capacity of the top seal as a whole.

To the contrary, the presence of formation overpressure can normally be estimated in drilled exploration targets. The presence of overpressure in reservoirs testifies to small pore throats in the cap rocks, as large pore throats will result in sufficiently high cap rock permeability to bleed off the overpressure.

We suggest a stepwise procedure that enables quantification of top seal capacities of overpressured traps, based on subsurface pressure information. This procedure starts with the estimation of cap rock permeabilities, which are consistent with observed overpressure gradients across the top seals. Knowledge of burial histories is essential for these estimations. Relationships between pore throat size and permeability from laboratory experiments are then applied to estimate critical pore throat diameters in cap rocks. These critical pore throat diameters, combined with information of the physical properties of the pore fluids, are then used to calculate membrane seal capacity of cap rocks.

Estimates of top seal capacity based on this procedure are rather sensitive to the vertical fluid velocity, but they are also to some extent sensitive to inaccuracies of the pore throat/permeability relationship, overpressure gradient, interfacial tensions between pore fluids, hydrocarbon density and water viscosity values. Despite these uncertainties, applications of the above‐mentioned procedure demonstrated that the mere presence of reservoir overpressures testifies to sufficient membrane seal capacity of cap rocks for most geological histories. Exempt from this statement are basins with rapid and substantial sediment compaction in the recent past.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2005.00281.x
2005-11-29
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2005.00281.x
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amyx, J.W., Bass, D.M. & Whiting, R.L. (1960) Petroleum Reservoir Engineering, Physical Properties. McGraw‐Hill, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aveyard, R. & Haydon, D.A. (1965) Thermodynamic properties of aliphatic hydrocarbon/water interfaces. Trans. Faraday Soc., 61, 2255–2261.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berg, R.R. (1975) Capillary pressures in stratigraphic traps. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., 59, 939–956.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Berg, R.R. & Avery, A.H. (1995) Sealing properties of Tertiary growth faults, Texas Gulf Coast. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., 79, 375–393.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bjørkum, P.A. (1996) How important is pressure in causing dissolution of quartz in sandstones?J. Sediment. Res., 66, 47–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonham, .L.C. (1980) Migration of hydrocarbons in compacting basins. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull, 64, 549–567.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Boult, P.J., Fischer, Q., Clinch, S.R.J., Lovibond, R. & Cockshell, C.D. (2003) Geomechanical, microstructural, and petrophysical evolution in experimentally reactivated cataclasites: applications to fault seal prediction: discussion. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., 87, 1681–1683.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dewhurst, D.N., Aplin, A.C., Sarda, J.‐P. & Yang, Y. (1998) Compaction‐driven evolution of porosity and permeability in natural mudstones: an experimental study. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 651–661.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Du Rouchet, J. (1984) Migration in fracture networks; an alternative interpretation of the supply of the ‘giant’ tar accumulation in Alberta, Canada. J. Petrol. Technol., 7, 381–402.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Firoozabadi, A. & Ramey, H.J. (1998) Surface tension of water‐hydrocarbon systems at reservoir conditions, J . Petrol. Technol., 27, 41–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fraser, S.I., Robinson, A.M., Johnson, H.D., Underhill, J.R., Kadolsky, D.G.A., Conell, R., Johannesen, P. & Ravnås, R. (2002) Upper jurassic. In: The Millenium Atlas: Petroleum Geology of the Central and Northern North Sea (Ed. by D.Evans , C.Graham , A.Armour & P.Bathurst ), pp. 157–189. The Geological Society, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gordon, D.S. & Flemings, P.B. (1998) Generation of overpressure and compaction‐driven fluid flow in a Plio‐Pleistocene growth‐faulted basin, Eugene Island 330, offshore Louisiana. Basin Res., 10, 177–196.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hassan, M.E., Nielson, R.F. & Calhoun, J.C. (1953) Effect of pressure and temperature on oil‐water interfacial tensions for a series of hydrocarbons. Petrol. Trans. AIME, 198, 299–306.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hocott, C.R. (1939) Interfacial tension between water and oil under reservoir conditions. Petrol. Trans. AIME, 192, 184–190.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hough, E.W., Rzasa, M.J. & Wood, B.B. (1951) Interfacial tensions at reservoir pressures and temperatures; apparatus and the water‐methane system. Petrol. Trans. AIME, 192, 57–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jennings, H.Y. & Newman, G.H. (1971) The effect of temperature and pressure on the interfacial tension of water against methane – normal decane mixtures. Soc. Petrol. Eng. J., 11, 171–175.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Katsube, T.J., Issler, D.R. & Cox, W.C. (1998) Shale permeability and its relation to pore‐size distribution. In: Current Research 1998‐D (pp. 51–57. Geological Survey of Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Krushin, J.T. (1997) Seal capacity of nonsmectite shale. In: Seals, traps and the petroleum system (Ed. by R.C.Surdam ), Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Mem., 67, 31–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Losh, S., Eglinton, L., Schoell, M. & Wood, J. (1999) Vertical and lateral fluid flow related to a large growth fault, South Eugene Island Block 330 Field, Offshore Louisiana. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., 83, 244–276.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. McCaffery, F.G. (1972) Measurement of interfacial tensions and contact angles at high temperature and pressure. J. Can. Petrol. Technol., 11, 26–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Nordgård Bolås, H.M., Hermanrud, C. & Teige, G.M.G. (2004) The validity of disequilibrium compaction in North Sea shales; constraints from basin modelling. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., 88, 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Oelkers, E.H., Bjørkum, P.A. & Murphy, W.M. (1996) A petrographic and computational investigation of quartz cementation and porosity reduction in North Sea sandstones. Am. J. Sci., 296, 420–452.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Pittman, E.D. (1992) Relationship of porosity and permeability to various parameters derived from mercury injection‐capillary pressure curves for sandstone. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., 76, 191–198.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Schlömer, S. & Krooss, B.M. (1997) Experimental characterization of the hydrocarbon sealing efficiency of cap rocks. Mar. Petrol. Geol., 14, 565–580.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Spencer, A.M., Holter, E., Campbell, C.J., Hanslien, S.H., Nelson, P.H.H., Nysæther, E. & Ormaasen, E.G. (1987) Geology of the Norwegian Oil and Gas Fields. Graham & Trotman, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Teige, G.M.G., Hermanrud, C., Thomas, W.H., Wilson, O.B. & Nordgård Bolås, H.M. (2005) Capillary resistance and trapping of hydrocarbons – a laboratory experiment: petrol. Geoscience, 11, 125–129.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Teige, G.M.G., Hermanrud, C., Wensaas, L. & Nordgård Bolås, H.M. (1999) The lack of relationship between overpressure and porosity in North Sea and Haltenbanken shales. Mar. Petrol. Geol., 16, 321–335.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Teige, G.M.G., Thomas, W.H., Hermanrud, C., Øren, P.‐E., Wilson, O.B., Rennan, L. & Nordgård Bolås, H.M. (in press) The permeability of residual water – implications for sealing analysis. J. Geophys. Res.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Watts, N.L. (1987) Theoretical aspects of cap‐rock and fault seals for single‐ and two‐phase hydrocarbon columns. Mar. Petrol. Geol., 4, 274–307.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Weast, R.C. & Astle, M.J. (1982) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 62nd edn. CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2005.00281.x
Loading
Seal capacity estimation from subsurface pore pressures
Basin Research 17, 583 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2005.00281.x
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2005.00281.x
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2005.00281.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error