Volume 9 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478



It has been observed in the course of a detailed investigation that Indian granites exhibit high ultrasonic velocities in contrast to the specimens obtained from other countries. An attempt has been made in this paper to offer an explanation of this peculiar behaviour. Firstly, the initial internal pressure and initial velocity at the time of formation of rocks are calculated by using the experimental results for the changes in velocity with pressure in Indian, American, Japanese and Russian rocks. Besides this, standard curves have been computed using the above named parameters. Also, their possible influence on the high velocity values of Indian rocks, even under atmospheric conditions is studied. The effect of time of the formation of rocks at specific depths is also calculated in detail. As one of the results of this investigation, it comes out that under high pressure (deeper depths) it requires longer time to complete the processes of formation of rocks than under low pressure (shallow depths) and under high pressure a lot of stress energy can be stored i.e., the initial velocity becomes high when the rock is formed at great depths while at shallow depths a less stress energy can be stored and consequently less velocity values. Thus the combined effect of time and physical conditions at the time of formation of rock on the velocity in the rock at a given time is investigated. It can be seen here that the elastic behaviour of rocks with pressure will provide a clue to the possible petrogenetic history and also the approximate age of the rock.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Balakrishna, S., 1953, “Physical properties of rocks and their relation to certain geological features.” Ph. D. Thesis submitted to Osmania University.
  2. Balakrishna, S., 1958, Bull. Nat. Inst. Sci.11, 50.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Balakrishna, S., 1961, Granite tectonics around Hyderabad, Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences, in press.
  4. Birch, F., 1958, Contributions to Geophysics, Pergamon Press, 12, 158.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bullen, K. E., 1947, An introduction to Theory of Seismology, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Biot, M. A., 1956, Jour. App. Mechanics, 3, 91–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Faust, L. Y., 1951, Geophysics, XVI, 192–206.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Faust, L. Y., 1953, GeophysicsXVIII, 271–288.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Iida, K., 1941, Determining the elastic constants of rocks by the vibration method.
  10. ZisinGeophysics13 (1) 299–314.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kusakabe, 1902, Publ. Earth of. Inv. Comm. No. 14.
  12. Kusakabe, 1904, Publ. Earth of. Inv. Comm., No. 17.
  13. Nagumo, S., 1958, Monthly Reprts. Geol. Surv. Japan, 8.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Nagumo, S., 1959, Monthly Reprts. Geol. Surv. Japan9.
  15. Shimozuru, D., 1952, Bull. Earth Quake. Res. Inst.30, 63.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Shimozuru, D., 1960, Japanese Jour. Geophys. Vol. 2, 3.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Takahasi, T. and Sato, Y., 1949, Bull. Earth Quake. Res. Inst.27.
  18. Takahasi, T. and Sato, Y., 1950, Bull. Earth Quake. Res. Inst.28.
  19. Wolarowitch, M. P., Balasjtchow, D. B. and Stachoswkaja, Z.I., 1958, Transactions of the fifth congress on experimental and technical mineralogy and petrography, Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R., p. 137–145.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error