1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 10, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 10 Number 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

For a given refraction time‐distance curve, the range in thickness for a hidden intermediate layer is given together with the effect the layer has on the total thickness of the two layers above the recorded refractor.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1962.tb02005.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1962.tb02005.x
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Hawkins, L. V. and Maggs, D., 1961, Nomograms for determining maximum errors and limiting conditions in seismic refraction surveys with a blind‐zone problem, Geophys. Prosp., 9, 526–532.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Shima, E., 1957, Note on the depth calculation by the seismic refraction method, Jour. Sox. Explor. Geophys. Japan, 10, 16–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Soske, J. L., 1959, The blind zone problem in engineering geophysics, Geophysics, 24, 359–365.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1962.tb02005.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error