1887
Volume 11 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

For a group of geophones at a single station, a signal‐to‐noise improvement of √n can only be expected when the background noise, between the individual detectors in the group, is completely uncorrected. This paper gives results, from four different sites, for the variation of correlation coefficient with distance between the detectors. It is found that at these locations the geophone spacings required to reduce the correlation coefficient to zero varied from 30 to 300 feet.

These results are in agreement with the predictions of the theoretical model of a two‐dimensional isotropic noise field described by Hills and Faran (1952). This model provides estimates of the spacing required between geophones to reduce the correlation coefficient to zero, provided that the velocity of the noise is known and that its spectrum is of a simple form.

Often it is impractical to reduce the correlation coefficient to zero because of the large spacing required between the geophones in the group. For this case a simple method is described in which the signal‐to‐noise improvement can be calculated given that the correlation coefficients between the geophones in the group are known. This procedure can easily be used in the field because the correlation coefficients can rapidly be computed from paper records by using Tomoda's method (Tomoda, 1956) which gives values of sufficient accuracy to be used for on‐the‐spot calculation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1963.tb02044.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blackman, R. B., and Tukey, J. W., 1959, The Measurements of Power Spectra, Dover Publications, New York .
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Faran, J. J.Jr., and Hills, R.Jr., 1952, The Application of Correlation Techniques to Acoustic Receiving Systems, Harvard University T.M. No. 28.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Tomoda, Y., 1956, A Simple Method for Calculating the Correlation Coefficients, J. Phys. Earth4 (2), pp. 67–70.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1963.tb02044.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error