1887
Volume 25 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

It appears that Doll (1951) and N. N. (1958, 1969, 1972) on the one hand, and Roy (1975) and Roy and Apparao (1976) on the other, used different formulas for computing the apparent resistivity for the Laterolog 7 sonde. This would partly explain the contra‐dictory nature of LL7 results from these two groups of workers.

The first group use a formula that relates the measured potential to a system of currents that are largely fictitious and non‐existent in the ground at the time of measurement. The second group, on the other hand, employ a formula that combines the observed signal with the currents that actually exist in the ground and produce that signal. We believe that the second procedure is the right one.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1977.tb01199.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dakhnov, V. N., 1953, Electrical prospecting for oil and gas deposits (in Russian): Gostoptekhizdat, Moscow & Leningrad , 497 pp. (second edition).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dakhnov, V. N., 1959, Geophysical Well logging (Translated by G. V.Keller , Qly. Col. School of Mines, vol. 57, no. 2, 1962), Moscow Petroleum Institute, Moscow .
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Doll, H. G., 1951, The Laterolog 7: a new resistivity logging method with electrodes using an automatic focussing system: Journal of Petroleum Technology 192, T. P.3198, 305–316.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Heiland, C. A., 1946, Geophysical exploration: Prentice‐Hall, Inc., N. Y. , xiii + 1013.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Keller, G. V., and Frischknecht, F. C., 1966, Electrical methods of geophysical prospecting, Pergamon Press, vii + 517.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kunetz, G., 1966, Principles of direct current resistivity prospecting, Borntraeger, Berlin – Nikolasse , ix + 103.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Moran, J. H., 1976, Discussion on “New Results in Resistivity Well Logging”, Geophysical Prospecting24, 401–402.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. N. N., 1958, Introduction to Schlumberger well logging, Schlumberger Document No. 8, Schlumberger Well Surveying Corporation.
  9. N. N., 1969, Log interpretation principles, Schlumberger Document, Schlumberger Limited.
  10. N. N., 1972, Log interpretation principles, Schlumberger Document, Schlumberger Limited.
  11. Owen, J. E., and Greer, W. J., 1951, The guard electrode logging system, Transactions of AIME, Petroleum Branch.
  12. Parasnis, D. S., 1973, Mining geophysics (second edition), Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, xii + 395.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Roy, A., 1975, New results in resistivity well logging, Geophysical Prospecting23, 426–448.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Roy, A., and Apparao, A., 1976, Laboratory results in resistivity logging, Geophysical Prospecting24, 123–140.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Van Nostrand, R. G., and Cook, K. L., 1966, Interpretation of resistivity data, USGS Professional Paper 499, US Govt. Printing House, Washington , xi + 310.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1977.tb01199.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error