1887
Volume 26 Number 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

Boreholes present a potential hazard to mining in rock salt mines. The only rock salt mine in England was almost lost when they mined into an unknown borehole open to an aquifer. Rock salt is a good transmitter of VHF radar waves, so a good method of detecting boreholes is by using radar probing. This paper investigates theoretically the detection of a borehole in advance of mining using two different radar systems, Bravo II and Charlie II. Bravo II has a peak power of 20 kW at 230 MHz and Charlie II has 3 W at 440 MHz. The borehole detectability depends critically on the radar wave attenuation in salt, which is characterized by its loss tangent, tan The backscattering cross section σ of the borehole is also important. These parameters are related in the radar signal‐to‐noise equation which determines the signal‐to‐noise ratio () for a given range in salt to the borehole. Theoretically, in salt with a tan of 10‐3, Charlie II can detect (= 3 dB) a 12.7 cm borehole 225 m in advance of mining while Bravo II, using only 100 W, can detect the same borehole 680 m ahead. These values are with the antenna field parallel to the axis of the borehole. Theory shows this antenna orientation to be optimum for maximum detection probability. For salt with a tan of 2 × 10‐5, the smallest value measured for salt, Bravo II can detect the borehole up to 15.3 km using maximum power of 20 kW.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1978.tb01599.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barton, D. K., and Ward, H. R., 1969. Handbook of radar measurement, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs , New Jersey , 9.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowyer, M., 1972. Ingress of brine into the Winsford rock salt mine, November, 1968, Presented at the European Committee for the Study of Salt meeting, Zurich, May 1972.
  3. King, R. W. P., and Wu, T. T., 1959. The scattering and diffraction of waves, Harvard University Press, Cambridge , Massachusetts , 22–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Stewart, R. D., and Unterberger, R. R., 1976. Seeing through rock salt with radar, Geophysics41, 123–132.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Tang, C. C. H., 1957. Backscattering from dielectric‐coated infinite cylindrical obstacles, Journal of Applied Physics28, 628–633.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Wait, J. R., 1955. Scattering of a plane wave from a circular dielectric cylinder at oblique incidence, Canadian Journal of Physics23, 189–195.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bowman, J. J., Senior, T. B.A., and Uslenghi, P. L. E., 1969. Electromagnetic and acoustical scattering by simple shapes, North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam , 92–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Burrows, C. R., and Attwood, S. S., 1949. Radio wave propagation, Academic Press, Inc., New York , 471–472.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Jordan, E. C., and Balmain, K. G., 1968. Electromagnetic waves and radiating systems, 2nd ed., Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs , New Jersey , 377–378.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Westman, H. P.
    , ed., 1968. Reference data for radio engineers, 5th ed., Howard W. Sams & Co., Inc., New York , 27–4–27–5.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1978.tb01599.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error