1887
Volume 26 Number 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

A finite realization of a discrete random noise process may be considered as a one‐sided energy signal. Its phase property can then be described by means of the center position. The samples of such a realization are the components of a random signal vector and the center position is therefore a random variable. A statistical analysis shows that the expected value of the center position equals half the time duration of the realization. This implies that the ‐transform of the realization may be expected to have an equal number of poles and zeros inside and outside the unit circle. The standard deviation from the expected value of the center position is shown to depend on the time duration of the realization and on the autocorrelation of the process. It follows that, for processes that can be described by the convolution of a white series and a disturbance wavelet, the center position is independent of the phase property of the wavelet. A conclusion based on these results is that the homomorphic technique of wavelet estimation through cepstrum stacking must give questionable outcomes. Another conclusion is that the super‐position of a realization of random noise on a minimum phase wavelet will in general give a mixed phase resulting signal. It is pointed out that schemes for the derivation of deconvolution filters do not take account of this phenomenon.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1978.tb01612.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berkhout, A. J., 1970. Minimum phase in sampled‐signal theory, D . Sc. thesis, Delft University of Technology.
  2. Berkhout, A. J., 1973. On the minimum‐length property of one‐sided signals, Geophysics38, 657–672.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Davenport, W. B., and Root, W. L., 1958. An introduction to the theory of random signals and noise, McGraw‐Hill, New York .
    [Google Scholar]
  4. De Voogd, N., 1976. An algorithm for digital Wiener filters and its application to seismic wavelets in noise, D . Sc. thesis, Delft University of Technology.
  5. Ray, C. H., 1976. Wavelet estimation–‐the essence of wavelet processing, 38th EAEG Meeting, The Hague, Holland.
  6. Ricker, N., 1944. Wavelet functions and their polynomials, Geophysics9, 314–323.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Robinson, E. A., and Treitel, S., 1967. Principles of digital Wiener filtering, Geophysical Prospecting15, 311–333.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Wilks, S. S., 1962. Mathematical statistics, John Wiley & Sons, New York .
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1978.tb01612.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error