1887
Volume 26 Number 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

It is well known that the application of the “bright spot’ technique has been more successful in marine prospecting than in land prospecting. This is due partly to the problem of distortion of the seismic signal caused by the geophone‐ground coupling, especially when carrying out high resolution, shallow seismic surveys in swampy terrain.

The effect of geophone‐ground coupling on the response of a single geophone to the incident compressional waves has been treated by several authors. However, they have always neglected the influence of mutual interaction between an array of geophones on the response of each geophone forming the array. We show that mutual interaction, which results from the re‐radiation of the incident compressional waves by the geophones forming the array, can have considerable effect on the response of each geophone.

The effect of the geophone‐ground coupling on the response of a seismic channel is considered in the absence and presence of mutual interaction between a group of geophones for the case when the shear wave velocity of the soil varies by a factor of three.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1978.tb01614.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blake, F. G., 1952. Spherical wave propagation in solid media, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.24, 211–215.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bycroft, G. N., 1956. Forced vibration of a rigid circular plate on a semi‐infinite elastic space and on an elastic stratum, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., Ser. A.248, 327–368.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gladwell, G. M. L., 1968. The calculation of mechanical impedance relating to an indenter vibrating on the surface of a semi‐infinite elastic body J. Sound and Vibration8, 215–228.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kinsler, L. E., and Frey, A. R., 1962. Fundamentals of acoustics, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York .
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Miller, G. F., and Pursey, H., 1954. The field and radiation impedance of mechanical radiators on the free surface of a semi‐infinite isotropic solid, Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. A.223, 521–541.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Miller, G. F., and Pursey, H., 1955. On the partition of energy between elastic waves in a semi‐infinite solid, Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. A.233, 55–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Rayleigh, J. W. S., 1945. Theory of sound, Dover Publication Inc., New York .
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Robertson, I. A., 1966. Forced vertical vibration of a rigid circular disc on a semi‐infinite solid, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. Math. Phys.62, 547.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Runyan, W. R., and Anderson, R. E., 1956. Mechanical impedance measurements of soils, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.28, 73–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Sherman, C. H., 1965. Theoretical model for mutual radiation resistance of small transducers at an air‐water surface, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.37, 532–533.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sung, T. Y., 1953. Vibration in semi‐infinite solids due to periodic surface loading, Am. Soc. Testing Mater. Spec. Tech. Publ. No.156, 35–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Washburn, H., and Wiley, H., 1941. Effect of placement of a seismometer on its response characteristics, Geophysics6, 116–132.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. White, R. M., 1957. Self reciprocity transducer calibration in solid medium, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.29, 834–836.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Wolf, A., 1944. The equation of motion of a geophone on the surface of an elastic earth, Geophysics9, 29–35.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1978.tb01614.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error