1887
Volume 29 Number 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

The laterites in Burundi, which are formed by weathering of ultrabasic rocks, show a complete profile with the following horizons: , the ferruginous crust capping, , consisting essentially of iron hydroxides, and , which contains a large quantity of hydrosilicate minerals. Nickel bearing minerals occur in the saprolite and the lower portion of ferralite.

Resistivity well‐logging and resistivity sounding indicated that the electrical properties of rocks depend upon their composition: Canga and ferralite showed high resistivities of 6,500 Ωm and 800 Ωm, respectively. The resistivity of saprolite was found to be much lower, between 10 Ωm and 20 Ωm. The laterite is underlain by resistive peridotite. The chargeability of saprolite was found to be lower than that of the upper horizons and the bedrock.

Electrolytic conductivity of laterite, which depends on the geometry of the deposit, was found to be low, because the laterite contains moisture and ground water, which are highly resistive. The relatively high conductivity of saprolite is caused by nickeliferous hydrosilicates, which exhibit the electrical properties of clay minerals, with an apparent maximum conductivity of 0.25 S/m. The conductivity of saprolite corresponds to a concentration between 30% and 50% of conductive silicate minerals distributed in the pore space of deposit. A nickel enrichment of up to 6% was estimated from the resistivity of the saprolite.

Prospecting for laterites by electrical sounding showed that the development of laterite horizons in a nickel deposit correlates with the surface morphology of weathered ultrabasic massif. Thus the method can be used in preliminary exploration of such deposits.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1981.tb00405.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Archie, G.E.1942, The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics, American Institute of Mining Engineers Transactions146, 54–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dakhnov, V.N.1962, Geophysical well logging, Quarterly of the Colorado School of Mines 57–2 (translated from Russian by Keller, G.V.).
  3. Komarov, V.A., Pishpareva, N.A., Semenov, M.V. and Hloponina, L.S.1966, Theoretical bases of interpretation of induced polarization field data (in Russian), Nedra, Leningrad .
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Orellana, E. and Mooney, H.M.1966, Master tables and curves for vertical electrical sounding over layered structures, Intersciencia, Madrid .
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ward, S.H. and FraserD.C.1967, Conduction of electricity in rocks, in Mining Geophysics, II, 198–207, SEG, Oklahoma .
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Webber, B.N.1972, Supergene nickel deposits, Transactions, SME—American Institute of Mining Engineers Transactions252, 333–347.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1981.tb00405.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error