1887
Volume 33 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Proper stacking of three‐dimensional seismic CDP‐data generally requires the knowledge of normal moveout velocities in all source‐receiver directions contributing to a CDP‐gather. The azimuthal variation of the stacking velocities mainly depends on the dip of the seismic interfaces. For a single dipping plane a simple relation exists between the dip and the azimuthal variation of NMO‐velocity. Varying strike and dip of subsequent reflectors, however, result in a complex dependency of the seismic parameters.

Reliable information on the spatial distribution of the normal moveout (NMO)‐velocity can be derived from a wavefront curvature estimation using a 3‐D ray‐tracing technique. These procedures require additional information, e.g. reflection time gradients or depth maps to show interval velocities between leading interfaces. Moreover, their application to an extended 3‐D data volume is restricted by high costs.

The need for a routine 3‐D procedure resulted in a special data selection to create pseudo 2‐D profiles and to apply existing velocity estimation routines to these profiles. At least three estimates in different directions are necessary to derive the full azimuthal velocity variation, characterized by the large and the small main axis and the orientation of the velocity ellipse.

Errors are estimated by means of computer models. Stacking velocities obtained by mathematical routines (least‐squares fit) and by seismic standard routines (NMO‐correction and correlation) are compared.

Finally, a general 3‐D velocity procedure using cross‐correlation of preliminarily NMO‐corrected traces is proposed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1985.tb00420.x
2006-04-27
2020-04-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Hubral, P.1976, Interval velocities from surface measurements in the three‐dimensional plane layer case, Geophysics41, 233–242.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hubral, P. and Krey, Th.1980, Interval Velocities from Seismic Reflection Time Measurements, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa .
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Krey, Th.1976, Computation of interval velocities from common reflection point moveout times for n layers of arbitrary dips and curvatures in three‐dimensions when assuming small shot‐geophone distances, Geophysical Prospecting24, 1–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Levin, F. K.1971, Apparent velocity from dipping interface reflections, Geophysics36, 510–516.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Shah, P. M.1973, Use of wave front curvature to relate seismic data with subsurface parameters, Geophysics38, 812–825.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ursin, B.1982, Quadratic wavefront and traveltime approximations in inhomogeneous layered media with curved interfaces, Geophysics47, 1012–1021.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1985.tb00420.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error