1887
Volume 33 Number 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

A main problem in computing reflection coefficients from seismograms is the instability of the inversion procedure due to noise. This problem is attacked for two well‐known inversion schemes for normal‐incidence reflection seismograms. The crustal model consists of a stack of elastic, laterally homogeneous layers between two elastic half‐spaces. The first method, which directly computes the reflection coefficients from the seismogram is called “Dynamic Deconvolution”. The second method, here called “Inversion Filtering”, is a two‐stage procedure. The first stage is the construction of a causal filter by factorization of the spectral function via Levinson‐recursion. Filtering the seismogram is the second stage. The filtered seismogram is a good approximation for the reflection coefficients sequence (unless the coefficients are too large).

In the non‐linear terms of dynamic deconvolution and Levinson‐recursion the noise could play havoc with the computation. In order to stabilize the algorithms, the bias of these terms is estimated and removed. Additionally incorporated is a statistical test for the reflection coefficients in dynamic deconvolution and the partial correlation coefficients in Levinson‐recursion, which are set to zero if they are not significantly different from noise.

The result of stabilization is demonstrated on synthetic seismograms. For unit spike source pulse and white noise, dynamic deconvolution outperforms inversion filtering due to its exact nature and lesser computational burden. On the other hand, especially in the more realistic bandlimited case, inversion filtering has the great advantage that the second stage acts linearly on the seismogram, which allows the calculation of the effect of the inversion procedure on the wavelet shape and the noise spectrum.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1985.tb00430.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aminzadeh, F. and Mendel, J. M.1982, Non‐normal incidence state‐space model and line source reflection synthetic seismogram, Geophysical Prospecting30, 541–568.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Loewenthal, D., Gutowski, P. R. and Treitel, S.1978, Direct inversion of transmission synthetic seismograms, Geophysics43, 886–898.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Mendel, J. M. and Habibi‐Ashrafi, F.1980, A survey of approaches to solving inverse problems for lossless layered media systems, IEEE-GE-18, 4, 320–330.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Mendel, J. M.1981, A time‐domain approach to the normal‐incidence inverse problem, Geophysical Prospecting29, 742–757.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Priestley, M. B.1981, Spectral Analysis and Time series, London , Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Robinson, E. A. and Treitel, S.1977, The spectral function of a layered system and the determination of waveforms at depth, Geophysical Prospecting25, 434–459.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Robinson, E. A.1982, Spectral approach to geophysical inversion by Lorentz, Fourier and Radon transforms, Proceedings of the IEEE70, 1039–1054.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Robinson, E. A.1967, Multichannel Time Series Analysis with Digital Computer Programs, Holden‐Day, San Francisco , California .
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Robinson, E. A. and Treitel, S.1978, The fine structure of the normal incidence synthetic seismogram, Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society53, 289–309.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Santosa, F.1982, Numerical scheme for the inversion of acoustical impedance profile based on the Gelfand-Levitan method Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society70, 229–243.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Schwetlick, H.1983, Inverse methods in the reconstruction of acoustical impedance profiles, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America73, 1179–1186.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1985.tb00430.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error