1887
Volume 33 Number 8
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

The increase in the number of geophone groups in production records during recent years and the requirement for accurate basic static corrections for high resolution records have made it necessary to develop sufficiently accurate automatic techniques for the determination of static corrections.

A fully automatic method is presented which makes use of the delay‐time method in order to compute static corrections at each shot position. Delay times, weathering and subweathering velocities are determined from automatic picks of the first arrivals on common‐offset trace collections.

It is assumed that the weathering is a single layer and that the dip of the subweathering layer under the geophone groups is small.

The picking routine is fully automatic and successful in most cases, provided the signal‐to‐noise ratio is sufficiently high.

The subsequent filtering of erroneous values for picked times is performed by means of statistical techniques, using curves of picked times on common‐offset trace collections. If the distance between receivers and shot‐points on the profile is sufficiently short, one can expect only little change in the picked times of two contiguous traces.

The method is well adapted to end‐on spreads with a great number of traces, where distances between geophone groups are short.

Examples are presented showing the possibilities of the method for the determination of long wavelength as well as short wavelength components of static corrections.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1985.tb01360.x
2006-04-27
2020-09-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barry, K. M.1967, Delay time and its application to refraction profile interpretation, in Seismic Refraction Prospecting, edited by A. W.Musgrave , Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa , Oklahoma .
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gardner, L. W.1939, An areal plan of mapping subsurface structure by refraction shooting, Geophysics4, 274–259.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gelchinsky, B. and Shtivelman, V.1983, Automatic picking of first arrivals and parameterization of traveltime curves, Geophysical Prospecting31, 915–928.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hagedoorn, G. J.1959, The Plus‐Minus method of interpreting seismic refraction sections, Geophysical Prospecting7, 158–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hatherly, P. J.1982, A computer method for determining seismic first arrival times, Geophysics47, 1431–1436.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Peraldi, R. and Clement, A.1972, Digital processing of refraction data. Study of first arrivals, Geophysical Prospecting20, 529–548.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sims, J. and Mackenzie, B. E.1973, Computer P‐wave picking, Oil and Gas Journal, Feb. 19, 1973, 58–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tomoda, Y., 1956, A simple method for calculating the correlation coefficients, Journal of Physics of the Earth4, 67–70.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1985.tb01360.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error