1887
Volume 36 Number 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Methods of minimum entropy deconvolution (MED) try to take advantage of the non‐Gaussian distribution of primary reflectivities in the design of deconvolution operators. Of these, Wiggins’(1978) original method performs as well as any in practice. However, we present examples to show that it does not provide a reliable means of deconvolving seismic data: its operators are not stable and, instead of whitening the data, they often band‐pass filter it severely. The method could be more appropriately called maximum kurtosis deconvolution since the varimax norm it employs is really an estimate of kurtosis. Its poor performance is explained in terms of the relation between the kurtosis of a noisy band‐limited seismic trace and the kurtosis of the underlying reflectivity sequence, and between the estimation errors in a maximum kurtosis operator and the data and design parameters.

The scheme put forward by Fourmann in 1984, whereby the data are corrected by the phase rotation that maximizes their kurtosis, is a more practical method. This preserves the main attraction of MED, its potential for phase control, and leaves trace whitening and noise control to proven conventional methods. The correction can be determined without actually applying a whole series of phase shifts to the data. The application of the method is illustrated by means of practical and synthetic examples, and summarized by rules derived from theory. In particular, the signal‐dominated bandwidth must exceed a threshold for the method to work at all and estimation of the phase correction requires a considerable amount of data.

Kurtosis can estimate phase better than other norms that are misleadingly declared to be more efficient by theory based on full‐band, noise‐free data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1988.tb02155.x
2006-04-27
2020-04-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Donoho, D.L.1981. On minimum entropy deconvolution. Applied Time Series Analysis II, D.F.Findley (ed), 565–608. Academic Press Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Fourmann, J.1985. Estimating phases of mixed‐phase wavelets (summary of remarks, SEG Deconvolution Workshop, 1984, Vail, Colorado). Geophysics50, 722.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gray, W.C.1979. Variable norm deconvolution. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Stanford , California .
  4. Hosken, J.W.J., Longbottom, J., Walden, A.T. and White, R.E., Maximum kurtosis phase and the phase of the seismic wavelet. Proceedings of 1986 EAEG/SEG Research Workshop on Deconvolution and Inversion. Bernabini et al. (eds), 38–51. Basil Black‐well.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Levy, S. and Oldenburg, D.1987. Automatic phase correction of common‐midpoint stacked data. Geophysics52, 51–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mallows, C.L.1967. Linear processes are nearly Gaussian. Journal of Applied Probability4, 313–329.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. McGlashan, M.L.1979. Chemical Thermodynamics. Academic Press Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Walden, A.T.1985. Non‐Gaussian reflectivity, entropy, and deconvolution. Geophysics50, 2862–2888.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Walden, A.T. and Hosken, J.W.J.1985. An investigation of the spectral properties of primary reflection coefficients. Geophysical Prospecting33, 400–435.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Walden, A.T. and Hosken, J.W.J.1986. The nature of the non‐Gaussianity of primary reflection coefficients and its significance for deconvolution. Geophysical Prospecting34, 1038–1066.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. White, R.E.1984. Signal and noise estimation from seismic reflection data using spectral coherence methods. Proceedings of IEEE72, 1340–1356.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. White, R.E. and O'Brien, P.N.S.1974. Estimation of the primary seismic pulse. Geophysical Prospecting22, 627–651.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Wiggins, R.A.1978. Minimum entropy deconvolution. Geoexploration16, 21–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Wiggins, R.A.1985. Entropy guided deconvolution. Geophysics50, 2720–2726.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1988.tb02155.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error