1887
Volume 36 Number 8
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

A parameter estimation or inversion procedure is incomplete without an analysis of uncertainties in the results. In the fundamental approach of Bayesian parameter estimation, discussed in Part I of this paper, the probability density function (pdf) is the solution to the inverse problem. It is the product of the pdf, containing information on the parameters, and the likelihood function, which represents the information from the data. The maximum of the pdf is usually taken as a point estimate of the parameters. The shape of this pdf, however, gives the full picture of uncertainty in the parameters. Uncertainty analysis is strictly a problem of information reduction. This can be achieved in several stages. Standard deviations can be computed as overall uncertainty measures of the parameters, when the shape of the pdf is not too far from Gaussian. Covariance and related matrices give more detailed information. An eigenvalue or principle component analysis allows the inspection of essential linear combinations of the parameters.

The relative contributions of information and data to the solution can be elegantly studied. Results in this paper are especially worked out for the non‐linear Gaussian case. Comparisons with other approaches are given. The procedures are illustrated with a simple two‐parameter inverse problem.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1988.tb02199.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BARD, Y.1974. Nonlinear Parameter Estimation. Academic Press, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. DUIJNDAM, A.J.W.1987. Detailed Bayesian inversion of seismic data. Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands .
  3. DUIJNDAM, A.J.W.1988. Bayesian estimation in seismic inversion. Part I: Principles. Geophysical Prospecting36, 878–898.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. JACKSON, D.D.1973. Marginal solutions to quasi‐linear inverse problems in geophysics: the edgehog method. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society35, 121–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. JACKSON, D.D.1976. Most‐squares inversion. Journal of Geophysical Research81, 1027–1030.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. JACKSON, D.D.1979. The use of a priori data to resolve non‐uniqueness in linear inversion. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society57, 137–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. JACKSON, D.D. and MATSU'URA, M.1985. A Bayesian approach to nonlinear inversion. Journal of Geophysical Research90, 581–591.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. TARANTOLA, A.1987. Inverse Problem Theory, Methods for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation. Elsevier Science Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. VAN RIEL, P. and BERKHOUT, A.J.1985. Resolution in seismic trace inversion by parameter estimation. Geophysics50, 1440–1455.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1988.tb02199.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error