1887
Volume 37 Number 8
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

An efficient full 3D wavefield extrapolation technique is presented. The method can be used for any type of subsurface structure and the degree of accuracy and dip‐angle performance are user‐defined. The extrapolation is performed in the space‐frequency domain as a space‐dependent spatial convolution with recursive Kirchhoff extrapolation operators.

To get a high level of efficiency the operators are optimized such that they have the smallest possible size for a specified accuracy and dip‐angle performance. As both accuracy and maximum dip‐angle are input parameters for the operator calculation, the method offers the possibility of a trade‐off between these quantities and efficiency. The operators are calculated in advance and stored in a table for a range of wavenumbers. Once they have been calculated they can be used many times.

At the basis of the operator design is the well‐known phase‐shift operator. Although this operator is exact for homogeneous media only, it is assumed that it may be applied locally in case of inhomogeneities. Lateral velocity variations can then be handled by choosing the extrapolation operator according to the local value of the velocity. Optionally the operators can be designed such that they act as spatially variant high‐cut filters. This means that the evanescent field can be suppressed in one pass with the extrapolation. The extrapolation method can be used both in prestack and post‐stack applications. In this paper we use it in zero‐offset migration. Tests on 2D and 3D synthetic and 2D real data show the excellent quality of the method. The full 3D result is much better then the result of two‐pass migration, which has been applied to the same data.

The implementation yields a code that is fully vectorizable, which makes the method very suitable for vector computers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1989.tb02241.x
2006-04-27
2020-07-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berkhout, A.J.1984. Seismic Migration: Imaging of Acoustic Energy by Wavefield Extrapolation. B. Practical Aspects, Elsevier Science Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkhout, A.J.1985. Seismic Migration: Imaging of Acoustic Energy by Wavefield Extrapolation. A. Theoretical Aspects. Elsevier Science Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berkhout, A.J. and Van Wulfften Palthe, D.W.1979. Migration in terms of spatial decon‐volution. Geophysical Prospecting27, 261–291.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chang, W. and McMechan, G.A.1989. 3D acoustic reverse‐time migration. Geophysical Prospecting37, 243–256.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gill, P.E., Murray, W. and Wright, M.H.1981. Practical Optimization. Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Holberg, O.1988. Towards optimum one‐way wave propagation. Geophysical Prospecting36, 99–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kelly, K.R., Alford, R.M. and Whitmore, N.D.1982. Modelling ‐ the forward method. Concepts and Techniques in Oil and Gas Exploration, Jain, K.C. and de Figueiredo, R.J.P. , eds., 91–114. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Raoult, J. and Dezard, Y.1985. Depth migration of seismic data by local extrapolation operators. 55th SEG meeting, Washington D.C , Expanded Abstracts, 316–318.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Van der Made, P.M.1988. Determination of macro subsurface models by generalized inversion. Doctoral thesis, Delft University of Technology.
  10. Yilmaz, O., Chambers, R., Nichols, D. and Abma, R.1987. Fundamentals of 3D migration. Leading Edge6, 22–30; 7, 26–33.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1989.tb02241.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error