TOMOGRAPHIC INVERSION OF NORMALIZED DATA: DOUBLE‐TRACE TOMOGRAPHY ALGORITHMS¹

References

1. Bishop, T.N., Bube, K.P., Cutler, R.T., Langan, R.T., Love, P.L., Resnick, J.R., Shuey, R.T., Spindler, D.A. and Wyld, H.W.1985. Tomographic determination of velocity and depth in laterally varying media. Geophysics50, 903–923.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bois, P., La Porte, M., Lavergne, M. and Thomas, G.1972. Well to well seismic measurements. Geophysics37, 471–480.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bregman, D.J.1986. Tomographic inversion of crosshole seismic data . Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto.
4. Dines, K.A. and Lytle, R.J.1979. Computerized geophysical tomography. Proceedings of the IEEE67, 1065–1073.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Dobróka, M. and Gacsályi, M.1987. The detection of fractured zones by means of in‐seam seismic absorption tomography [in Hungarian]. Journal of Mining and Metallurgy, BKL, Banyaszat120, 108–110.
   [Google Scholar]
6. East, R.J.R., Worthington, M.H. and Goulty, N.R.1988. Convolutional back‐projection imaging of physical models with crosshole seismic data. Geophysical Prospecting36, 139–148.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Gelbke, C., Miranda, F. and Sattel, G.1989. Results of a seismic transmission tomgraphy survey at the Grimsel Rock Laboratory. The Log Analyst30, 243–260.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Gersztenkorn, A. and Scales, J.A.1988. Smoothing seismic tomograms with alpha‐trimmed means. Geophysical Journal92, 67–72.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Gustavson, M., Israelson, H., Ivansson, S., Moren, P. and Pihl, J.1982. A seismic cross‐hole experiment in crystalline rock. Proceedings of workshop on geophysical investigations in connection with geological disposal of radioactive waste, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Ottawa, Canada, 149–156.
10. Gustavson, M., Israelson, M., Ivansson, S., Moren, P. and Pihl, J.1986. An experiment with the seismic crosshole method in an iron mine. The Leading Edge3, 143–145.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hermann, G.T., Lent, A. and Rowland, S.W.1973. ART‐mathematics and applications. Journal of Theoretical Biology42, 1–32.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Ivansson, S.1985. A study of methods for tomographic velocity estimation in the presence of low‐velocity zones. Geophysics50, 969–988.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Körmendi, A., Bodoky, T., Hermann, L., Dianiska, L. and Kalman, T.1986. Seismic measurements for safety in mines. Geophysical Prospecting34, 1022–1037.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Krajewski, C., Dresen, L., Gelbke, C. and Rüter, H.1989. Iterative tomographic methods to locate seismic low‐velocity anomalies: a model study. Geophysical Prospecting37, 717–751.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Lines, L. and Treitel, S.1984. A review of least‐square inversion and its application to geophysical problems. Geophysical Prospecting32, 159–186.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Mason, I.M.1981. Algebraic reconstruction of a two dimensional velocity inhomogeneity in the High Hazles seam of Thoresby colliery. Geophysics46, 298–308.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Neumann‐Denzau, G. and Behrens, J.1984. Inversion of seismic data using tomographical reconstruction techniques for investigations of laterally inhomogeneous media. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society79, 305–315.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Nolet, G.1985. Solving or resolving inadequate and noisy tomographic systems. Journal of Computational Physics61, 463–482.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Scales, J.A.1987. Tomographic inversion via the conjugate gradient method. Geophysics52, 179–185.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Wong, J., Hurley, P. and West, G.F.1983. Crosshole seismology and seismic imaging in crystalline rocks. Geophysical Research Letters10, 686–689.
    [Google Scholar]