1887
Volume 40 Number 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

The Fourier spectral method and high‐order differencing have both been shown to be very accurate in computing spatial derivatives of the acoustic wave equation, requiring only two and three gridpoints per shortest wavelength respectively. In some cases, however, there is a lack of flexibility as both methods use a uniform grid. If these methods are applied to structures with high vertical velocity contrasts, very often most of the model is oversampled. If a complicated interface has to be covered by a fine grid for exact representation, both methods become less attractive as the homogeneous regions are sampled more finely than necessary.

In order avoid this limitation we present a differencing scheme in which the grid spacings can be extended or reduced by any integer factor at a given depth. This scheme adds more flexibility and efficiency to the acoustic modelling as the grid spacings can be changed according to the material properties and the model geometry. The time integration is carried out by the rapid expansion method. The spatial derivatives are computed using either the Fourier method or a high‐order finite‐difference operator in the ‐direction and a modified high‐order finite‐difference operator in the ‐direction. This combination leads to a very accurate and efficient modelling scheme. The only additional computation required is the interpolation of the pressure in a strip of the computational mesh where the grid spacing changes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1992.tb00369.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cerjan, C., Kosloff, R. and Kosloff, D.1985. A non‐reflecting boundary condition for discrete acoustic and elastic wave calculation. Geophysics50, 705–708.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dablain, M.A.1986. The application of high‐order differencing to the scalar wave equation. Geophysics51, 54–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fornberg, B.1988a. Generation of finite difference formulas on arbitrarily spaced grids. Mathematics of Computation51, 699–706.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fornberg, B.1988b. The pseudospectral method: accurate representation of interfaces in elastic wave calculations. Geophysics41, 2–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gazdag, J.1981. Modeling of the acoustic wave equation with transform methods. Geophysics46, 854–859.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Holberg, O.1987. Computational aspects of the choice of operator and sampling interval for numerical differentation in large‐scale simulation of wave phenomena. Geophysical Prospecting35, 625–655.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kosloff, D. and Baysal, E.1982. Forward modeling by a Fourier method. Geophysics47, 1402–1412.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kosloff, D., Filho, A., Tessmer, E. and Behle, A.1989. Numerical solution of the acoustic and elastic wave equation by a new rapid expansion method (REM). Geophysical Prospecting37, 383–394.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Vidale, J.E.1990. Comment on ‘A comparison of finite‐difference and Fourier‐method calculations of synthetic seismograms’ by C. R.Daudt et al.Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America80, 493–495.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1992.tb00369.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error