1887
Volume 40 Number 5
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

Seismic amplitude variations with offset contain information about the elastic parameters. Prestack amplitude analysis seeks to extract this information by using the variations of the reflection coefficients as functions of angle of incidence. Normally, an approximate formula is used for the reflection coefficients, and variations with offset of the geometrical spreading and the anelastic attenuation are often ignored. Using angle of incidence as the dependent variable is also computationally inefficient since the data are recorded as a function of offset.

Improved approximations have been derived for the elastic reflection and transmission coefficients, the geometrical spreading and the complex travel‐time (including anelastic attenuation). For a 1 D medium, these approximations are combined to produce seismic reflection amplitudes (P‐wave, S‐wave or converted wave) as a Taylor series in the offset coordinate. The coefficients of the Taylor series are computed directly from the parameters of the medium, without using the ray parameter.

For primary reflected P‐waves, dynamic ray tracing has been used to compute the offset variations of the transmission coefficients, the reflection coefficient, the geometrical spreading and the anelastic attenuation. The offset variation of the transmission factor is small, while the variations in the geometrical spreading, absorption and reflection coefficient are all significant.

The new approximations have been used for seismic modelling without ray tracing. The amplitude was approximated by a fourth‐order polynomial in offset, the traveltime by the normal square‐root approximation and the absorption factor by a similar expression. This approximate modelling was compared to dynamic ray tracing, and the results are the same for zero offset and very close for offsets less than the reflector depth.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1992.tb00538.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aki, K. and Richards, P.G.1980. Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods. Volume 1. W.H. Freeman & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Balogh, D., Snyder, G. and Barney, W.1986. Examples of a new approach to offset amplitude analysis. 56th SEG meeting, Houston, Expanded Abstracts, 350–351.
  3. Castagna, J.P., Batzle, M.L. and Eastwood, R.L.1985. Relationships between compressional‐wave and shear‐wave velocity in clastic silicate rocks. Geophysics50, 571–581.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ČErvený, V.1987. Ray methods for three‐dimensional seismic modelling. Lecture notes. The Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim .
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ČErvený, V., Molotkov, A. and Pšenčik, I.1977. Ray Method in Seismology. Charles University, Praha
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dahl, T. and Ursin, B.1991. Parameter estimation in a one‐dimensional anelastic medium. Journal of Geophysical Research96, 20217–20233.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dahl, T. and Ursin, B.1992. Nonlinear AVO inversion for a stack of anelastic layers. Geophysical Prospecting40, 243–265.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hron, F., May, B.T., Covey, J.D. and Daley, P.F.1986. Synthetic seismic sections for acoustic, elastic, anisotropic and vertically inhomogeneous media. Geophysics51, 710–735.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Shuey, R.T.1985. A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations. Geophysics50, 609–614.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Smith, G.C. and Gidlow, P.M.1987. Weighted stacking for rock property estimation and detection of gas. Geophysical Prospecting35, 993–1014.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Taner, M.T. and Koehler, F.1969. Velocity spectra‐digital computer derivation and application of velocity functions. Geophysics34, 859–881.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ursin, B.1977. Seismic velocity estimation. Geophysical prospecting25, 658–666.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ursin, B.1990. Offset‐dependent geometrical spreading in a layered medium. Geophysics55, 492–496.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ursin, B. and Dahl, T.1990. Least‐squares estimation of reflectivity polynomials. 60th SEG Meeting, San Francisco, Expanded Abstracts, 1069–1071.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1992.tb00538.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error