1887
Volume 40 Number 8
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

The following discussion concentrates on one of the synthetic examples used by Palmer (1991) to justify his method of seismic refraction interpretation (Fig. 2, p. 1035) and on his field data and interpretation of the first field example (a collapsed doline) which appeared on pp. 1050–1053.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1992.tb00560.x
2006-04-27
2020-03-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Palmer, D.1980. The Generalized Reciprocal Method of Seismic Refraction Interpretation. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Palmer, D.1990. The generalized reciprocal method‐an integrated approach to shallow refraction seismology. Exploration Geophysics21, 31–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Palmer, D.1991. The resolution of narrow low velocity zones with the generalized reciprocal method. Geophysical Prospecting39, 1031–1060.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ackerman, H.D., Pankratz, L.W. and Danserau, D.1986. Resolution of ambiguities of shallow refraction travel‐timecurves. Geophysics51, 223–235.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Whiteley, R.J.1990a. Engineering geophysics‐a geophysicist's view. Exploration Geophysics21, 7–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Whiteley, R.J.1990b. Discussion on engineering geophysics–‐a geophysicist's view. Exploration Geophysics21, 131–143.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Whiteley, R.J.1990c. Advances in engineering seismics. 6th International Congress of the International Association of Engineering Geology, Rotterdam. Proceedings2, 813–825.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1992.tb00560.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error