1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 42, Issue 7
  5. Article
Volume 42 Number 7
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Abstract

The variation in the density of sediments with depth in a sedimentary basin can be represented by a hyperbolic function. Gravity anomaly expressions for a 2D vertical prism and an asymmetric trapezium with a hyperbolic density distribution are derived in a closed form. These are used in inverting the gravity anomaly of a sedimentary basin with variable density. Firstly, the basin is viewed as a series of prisms juxtaposed with each other. The initial thickness of each prism is obtained from the gravity anomaly at its centre, based on the gravity anomaly of an infinite slab with a hyperbolic density contrast. These thicknesses are improved, based on the differences between the observed and the calculated anomalies. For an improved rate of convergence of the solution, these thicknesses may alternatively be refined using the well‐known ridge regression technique. Secondly, the basin is approximated by an asymmetric trapezium and its anomalies are inverted for the parameters of the trapezium using the ridge regression. Since this approximation serves to oversimplify the floor of the basin, it must be used only when the sediment‐basement interface has minor undulations. The results of a hypothetical case and two field cases (the San Jacinto Graben, California and the Godavari Graben, southern India) are presented. In both field cases, the interpreted depths are comparable with the real ones, proving the validity of the assumption of a hyperbolic density distribution of the sediments in the two basins considered.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1994.tb00243.x
2006-04-28
2024-04-23

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1994.tb00243.x
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AgarwalB.N.P.1971. Direct gravity interpretation of a sedimentary basin using a digital computer: part 1. Pure and Applied Geophysics86, 5–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AthyL.F.1930. Density, porosity and compaction of sedimentary rocks. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists14, 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BottM.H.P.1960. The use of rapid digital computing methods for direct gravity interpretation of sedimentary basins. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society3, 63–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CordellL.1973. Gravity analysis using an exponential density‐depth function, San Jacinto Graben, California. Geophysics38, 684–690.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CordellL. and HendersonG.1968. Iterative three‐dimensional solution of gravity anomaly data using a digital computer. Geophysics33, 596–601.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. HedbergH.1936. The gravitational compaction of clays and shales. American Journal of Science31, 241–287.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. HowellL.G., HeintzK.O. and BarryA.1966. The development and use of a high‐precision downhole gravity meter. Geophysics31, 764–772.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. KailaK.L., MurthyP.R.K.RaoV.K. and VenkateswarluN.1990. Deep seismic sounding in the Godavari Graben and Godavari (coastal) basin, India. Tectonophysics173, 307–317.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. LitinskyV.A.1989. Concept of effective density: Key to gravity depth determinations for sedimentary basins. Geophysics54, 1474–1482.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. MarquardtD.W.1963. An algorithm for least‐squares estimation of non‐linear parameters. Journal of the Society of Industrial Applied Mathematics11, 431–441.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. MaxantJ.1980. Variation of density with rock type, depth and formation in the western Canada basin from density logs. Geophysics45, 1061–1076.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. MishraD.C., GuptaS.B., RaoM.B.S.V., VenkatarayuduM. and LaxmanG.1987. Godavari basin‐a geophysical study. Journal of the Geological Society of India30, 469–476.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MishraD.C., GuptaS.B. and VenkatarayuduM.1989. Godavari rift and its extension towards the east coast of India. Earth and Planetary Science Letters94, 344–352.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. MurthyI.V.R. and RaoD.B.1979. Gravity anomalies of two‐dimensional bodies of irregular cross‐section with density contrast varying with depth. Geophysics44, 1525–1530.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. RaoD.B.1986. Modelling of sedimentary basins from gravity anomalies with variable density contrast. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society84, 207–212.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. RaoD.B.1990. Analysis of gravity anomalies of sedimentary basins by an asymmetrical trapezoidal model with quadratic function. Geophysics55, 226–231.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. RaoB.S.R. and MurthyI.V.R.1978. Gravity and Magnetic Methods of Prospecting. Arnold‐Heinemann Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. RaoV.B. and VenkateswarluP.D.1974. A simple method of interpreting gravity anomalies over sedimentary basins. Geophysical Research Bulletin12, 177–182.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1994.tb00243.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error