1887
Volume 52, Issue 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Most methods for velocity macromodel estimation require considerable operator input, mainly concerning the regularization and the picking of events in the data set or in the migrated images. For both these aspects, slope tomography methods offer interesting solutions. They consider locally coherent events characterized by their slopes in the data cube. Picking is then much easier and consequently denser than in standard traveltime tomography. Stereotomography is the latest slope tomography method. In recent years it has been improved significantly, both from an algorithmic point of view and in terms of practical use. Robust and fast procedures are now available for 2D stereotomographic picking and optimization.

Concerning the picking, we propose simple criteria for the selection of relevant data among the automatically picked events. This enables an accurate smooth velocity macromodel to be estimated quite rapidly and with very limited operator intervention. We demonstrate the method using a 2D line extracted from the Oseberg NH8906 data set.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00440.x
2004-11-02
2020-07-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AleriniM.2002. Imagerie sismique en profondeur de données OBC via la théorie des rais en milieu isotrope . PhD thesis, Ecole des Mines de Paris .
  2. AleriniM., LambaréG., BainaR. and PodvinP.2003a. Stereotomography: a fast approach for velocity macromodel estimation. EAGE/SEG Summer Research Workshop , Trieste , Expanded Abstracts, T28.
  3. AleriniM., LambaréG., PodvinP. and Le BégatS.2003b. Stereotomography: extension and application to converted waves. EAGE/SEG Summer Research Workshop , Trieste , Expanded Abstracts, T31.
  4. AleriniM., LambaréG., PodvinP. and Le BégatS.2003c. Depth imaging of the 2D–4C OBC Mahogany dataset: application of PP‐PS Stereotomography. 73rd SEG meeting, Dallas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 850–853.
  5. AleriniM., Le BégatS., LambaréG. and BainaR.2002. 2D P‐P and P‐S stereotomography of a multi‐component dataset. 72nd SEG meeting, Salt Lake City , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 838–841.
  6. BilletteF.1998. Estimation de macro‐modèles de vitesse en sismique réflexion par stéréotomographie . PhD thesis, University Paris VII .
  7. BilletteF. and LambaréG.1998. Velocity macromodel estimation from seismic reflection data by Stereotomography. Geophysical Journal International135, 671–680.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. BilletteF., Le BégatS., PodvinP. and LambaréG.2003. Practical aspects and applications of 2D Stereotomography. Geophysics67, 1213–1224.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. BoorC.1978. A Practical Guide to Splines . Springer‐Verlag, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. ChalardE., PodvinP., LambaréG. and AudebertF.2000. Estimation of velocity macromodels by 3D Stereotomography. 70th SEG meeting, Calgary , Canada , Expanded Abstracts, 2257–2260.
  11. ChalardE., PodvinP., Le BégatS., BerthetP. and DavidB.2002. 3D stereotomographic inversion on a real dataset. 72nd SEG meeting, Salt Lake City , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 946–948.
  12. ChaurisH. and NobleM.2001. Two‐dimensional velocity macro model estimation from seismic reflection data by local differential semblance optimisation: application to synthetic and real data sets. Geophysical Journal International144, 14–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. ChaurisH., NobleM., LambaréG. and PodvinP.2002a. Migration velocity analysis from locally coherent events in 2‐D laterally heterogeneous media, Part I: Theoretical aspects. Geophysics67, 1202–1212.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ChaurisH., NobleM., LambaréG. and PodvinP.2002b. Migration velocity analysis from locally coherent events in 2‐D laterally heterogeneous media, Part II: Applications on synthetic and real data. Geophysics67, 1213–1224.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. FaginS.1998. Model‐based Depth Imaging . Society of Exploration Geophysicists .
    [Google Scholar]
  16. FarraV. and MadariagaR.1987. Seismic waveform modeling in heterogeneous media by ray perturbation theory. Journal of Geophysical Research92, 2697–2712.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. FarraV. and MadariagaR.1988. Non‐linear reflection tomography. Geophysical Journal95, 135–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. GosseletA., Le BégatS. and PetersenS.2003. 2D walk‐away transmission Stereotomography. 73rd SEG meeting, Dallas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 678–681.
  19. LambaréG.2002. The use of locally coherent events in depth processing: a state of the art. 72nd SEG meeting, Salt Lake City , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 2261–2264.
  20. LambaréG., BoëlleJ.‐L. and AleriniM.2003a. P‐P and P‐S Stereotomography: an application to a 2D‐OBC‐4C real dataset. 73rd SEG meeting, Dallas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 809–812.
  21. LambaréG., AleriniM., BainaR. and PodvinP.2003b. Stereotomography: a fast approach for velocity macromodel estimation. 73rd SEG meeting, Dallas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 2076–2079.
  22. Le BégatS., PodvinP. and LambaréG.2000. Application of 2‐D stereotomography to marine seismic reflection data. 70th SEG meeting, Calgary , Canada , Expanded Abstracts, 2142–2145.
  23. NguyenS., BainaR., NobleM. and ThierryP.2002. Tomography picking in the depth domain using migration of attributes. 72nd SEG meeting, Salt Lake City , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1140–1143.
  24. PaigeC. and SaundersM.A.1982. LSQR: an algorithm for sparse linear equations and least‐squares problems. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software8, 43–71.DOI: 10.1145/355984.355989
    [Google Scholar]
  25. PrattR.G. and ChapmanC.H.1992. Traveltime tomography in anisotropic media. II. Application. Geophysical Journal International109, 20–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. RiabinkinL.A.1957. Fundamentals of resolving power of Controlled Directional Reception (CDR) of seismic waves. In: Slant Stack Processing , pp. 36–60. Geophysics Reprint Series Vol. 14, 1991. Society of Exploration Geophysicists . (Translated and paraphrased from Prikladnaya 16 , 3–36.)
    [Google Scholar]
  27. SwordS.1987. Tomographic determination of interval velocities from reflection seismic data: The method of controlled directional reception . PhD thesis, Stanford University .
  28. ThierryP., JoussetP., BainaR., RibodettiA. and BilletteF.2000. 3‐D preserved amplitude processing sequence in a real case. 70th SEG meeting, Calgary , Canada , Expanded Abstracts, 239–242.
  29. ThierryP., LambaréG., PodvinP. and NobleM.1999. 3‐D preserved amplitude prestack depth migration on a workstation. Geophysics64, 222–229.DOI: 10.1190/1.1444518
    [Google Scholar]
  30. TuraA., HanitzschC. and CalandraH.1997. 3‐D AVO migration/inversion of field data. Journal of Seismic Exploration6, 117–125. (Special Issue on Amplitude Preserving Seismic Reflection Imaging.)
    [Google Scholar]
  31. WangB.1993. Improvement of seismic travel‐time inversion methods and application to observed data . PhD thesis, Purdue University .
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00440.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00440.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error