1887
Volume 53, Issue 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Combined time‐lapse reservoir simulation and seismic modelling has been performed on both 1D and 3D models of a channelized turbidite reservoir. The models have been built using core, log, laboratory and seismic data from the Nelson Field (central North Sea) as a template. Oil and water movement in the main channels, channel margins and interchannel regions is investigated, with a particular focus being the effect of poor net‐to‐gross. The analysis confirms that saturation effects dominate the response whilst stress‐sensitivity effects play a minor role. The trough–peak signature in the seismic difference volumes formed by the sweep of the water can be continued and mapped slightly further than the channel margins. This characteristic 4D signature remains roughly intact, despite the complicated depositional architecture, and accurately delineates the area of moved fluid, but it needs additional calibration to combat the detrimental influence of the low net‐to‐gross. Signal strength is largely dependent on reservoir quality, but is also compromised by the net‐to‐gross, fluid distribution and, more critically, by the exact timing of the seismic survey. For example, a region of bypassed oil zone remains undetected as it forms early during the production. This work demonstrates that to understand fully the 4D signature at a quantitative level requires adequate knowledge of the fluid properties, but also, more critically, the geology.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00463.x
2005-02-14
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al‐MaskeriY. and MacBethC. 2003. Model controlled quantitative interpretation of 4D signatures in turbidite sands. 6th SGBF conference, Rio de Janeiro, Time‐lapse session.
  2. AlsosT., TondelR., AanvikF. and SolheimO.A.2003. Quantifying rise in gas–water contact from time‐lapse seismic on the Sleipner Ost field. 65th EAGE conference, Stavanger , Norway , Extended Abstracts, A08.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BatzleM. and WangZ.1992. Seismic properties of pore fluids. Geophysics57, 1396–1408.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BeydounW., KerdraonY., LefeuvreF., BancelinJ.P., MedinaS. and BleinesB.2002. Benefits of a 3DHR survey for Girassol Field appraisal and development, Angola . The Leading Edge21, 1152–1155.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boyd‐GorstJ., FailP. and PointingL.2001. 4‐D time lapse reservoir monitoring of Nelson Field, central North Sea: Successful use of an integrated rock physics model to predict and track reservoir production. The Leading Edge20, 1336–1350.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BurkhartT., HooverA.R. and FlemingsP.B.2000. Time‐lapse (4‐D) seismic monitoring of primary production of turbidite reservoirs at South Timbalier Block 295, offshore Louisiana, Gulf of Mexico. Geophysics65, 351–367.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DromgooleP., BowmanM., LeonardA., WeimerP. and SlattR.M.2000. Developing and managing turbidite reservoirs – case histories and experiences: results of the 1998 EAGE/AAPG research conference. Petroleum Geoscience6, 97–105.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. FjaerE. and HoltR.M.1999. Stress and stress release effects on acoustic velocities from cores, logs and seismics. 40th SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium, paper WW.
  9. HamonG.2003. Two‐phase rock‐typing: another perspective. Proceedings of the Annual SPE Meeting , SPE No. 84035.
  10. HoltR.M. and FjaerE.2003. Wave velocities in shales – a rock physics model. 65th EAGE conference, Stavanger , Norway , Extended Abstracts, C13.
  11. KennettB.L.N.1983. Seismic Wave Propagation in Stratified Media. Cambridge Monographs on Mechanics and Applied Mathematics. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. MacBethC. 2002. Multi‐Component VSP Analysis for Applied Seismic Anisotropy . Handbook of Geophysical Exploration. Pergamon Press, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MacBethC. 2004. A classification for the pressure sensitivity properties of a sandstone rockframe. Geophysics69, 497–510.DOI: 10.1190/1.1707070
    [Google Scholar]
  14. McInallyA.T., Redondo‐LópezT., GarnhamJ., KunkaJ., BrooksA.D., Strenstrup‐HansenL., BarclayF. & DaviesD.2003. Optimising 4D fluid imaging. Petroleum Geoscience9, 91–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. ParrR., MarshJ. and GriffinT.2000. Interpretation and integration of 4‐D results into reservoir management, Schiehallion Field, UKCS. 70th SEG meeting, Calgary , Canada , Expanded Abstracts, 1464–1467.
  16. PickupG.E. and StephenK.D.2000. An assessment of steady‐state scale‐up for small‐scale geological models. Petroleum Geoscience6, 203–210.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. PostmaG.W.1955. Wave propagation in a stratified medium. Geophysics20, 780–806.DOI: 10.1190/1.1438187
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Redondo‐LópezT., McInallyA.T., BrooksA.D. and KunkaJ.2002. Quantitative integration of 4D seismic for field development. 87th AAPG Annual Meeting, Houston , USA , vol. 11, A146.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ReidF.J.L., MacBethC. and McInallyA.T.2003. 4D signal enhancement using singular value decomposition: OWC movement on the Nelson field. 65th EAGE conference, Stavanger , Norway , Extended Abstracts, A11.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. RingroseP.S., SorbieK.S., CorbettP.W.M. and JensenJ.L.1993. Immiscible flow behaviour in laminated and cross‐bedded sandstones. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering9, 103–124.DOI: 10.1016/0920-4105(93)90071-L
    [Google Scholar]
  21. SantosR.A., SobrinhoA.A., PintoA.C., DillonL.D., RitterG.L.S., SilvaE.F.F. et al . 2003. 4D integrated technologies for deep‐water turbidite reservoirs: from petrophysics to fluid flow simulation. Petroleum Geoscience9, 73–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. StephenK.D., ClarkJ.D. and GardinerA.R.2001. Outcrop‐based stochastic modelling of turbidite amalgamation and its effects on hydrocarbon recovery. Petroleum Geoscience7, 163–172.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. StephenK.D., ClarkJ.D. and PickupG.E.2002. Modelling and flow simulations of a North Sea turbidite reservoir: sensitivities and upscaling. Proceedings of the 13th European Petroleum Conference , Aberdeen , UK , SPE No. 78292.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00463.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00463.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error