1887
Volume 53, Issue 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

In the central North Sea ‘Gannet‐A’ field, a 50 ft oil rim is overlain by a gas cap of variable thickness. Oil is produced from horizontal wells which initially produced dry oil, but as the field became more mature, a significant water cut was seen in several wells. A dedicated 4D seismic monitor survey was acquired in order to assess the remaining distribution of oil reserves. By forward modelling the synthetic seismic response to parameters such as contact movement and residual saturations (using 2D and 3D wedge models), and comparing the results with real seismic data, we are able to decipher the contact movements across the field. It is shown that, in one part of the field, the increased water cut is caused primarily by the vertical displacement of the entire oil rim into the initial gas cap. This oil‐rim displacement produces a very different 4D seismic response from the case of a static gas–oil contact and rising oil–water contact (normal production). As a result of these observations, we are able to optimize field production by both re‐perforation of existing wells and by drilling sidetracks into the displaced rim: a brown‐field development opportunity that might otherwise be missed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00468.x
2005-02-14
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AlsosT., TondelR., AanvikF. and SolheimO.A.2003. Quantifying rise in gas water contact from time‐lapse seismic on the Sleipner Ost field. 65th EAGE conference, Stavanger , Norway , Extended Abstracts, paper A08.
  2. BarkvedO., BuerK., HallelandK.B., KjelstadliR., KleppanT. and KristiansenT.2003. 4D seismic response of primary production and waste injection at the Valhall field. 65th EAGE conference, Stavanger , Norway , Extended Abstracts, paper A22.
  3. ConnollyP.1999. Elastic impedance. The Leading Edge18, 438–452.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. HatchellP., SayersC., Van Den BeukelA., MolenaarM., MaronK., KenterC., StammeijerJ. and Van Der VeldeJ.2003. Whole earth 4D: Monitoring geomechanics. 73rd SEG meeting, Dallas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1330–1333.
  5. KloostermanH.J., KellyR.S., StammeijerJ., HartungM., Van WaardeJ. and ChajeckiC.2003. Successful application of time lapse seismic in Shell Expro's Gannet Fields, central North Sea UKCS. Petroleum Geoscience9, 25–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. KosterK., GabrielsP., HartungM., VerbeekJ., DeinumG. and StaplesR.2000. Time‐lapse seismic surveys in the North Sea and their business impact. The Leading Edge19, 286–293.DOI: 10.1190/1.1438594
    [Google Scholar]
  7. LandrøM.2001. Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation changes from time‐lapse seismic data. Geophysics66, 836–844.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00468.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00468.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error