1887
Volume 53, Issue 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the measurements of the acoustic and petrophysical properties of two suites of low‐shale sandstone samples from North Sea hydrocarbon reservoirs, under simulated reservoir conditions. The acoustic velocities and quality factors of the samples, saturated with different pore fluids (brine, dead oil and kerosene), were measured at a frequency of about 0.8 MHz and over a range of pressures from 5 MPa to 40 MPa.

The compressional‐wave velocity is strongly correlated with the shear‐wave velocity in this suite of rocks. The ratio / varies significantly with change of both pore‐fluid type and differential pressure, confirming the usefulness of this parameter for seismic monitoring of producing reservoirs.

The results of quality factor measurements were compared with predictions from Biot‐flow and squirt‐flow loss mechanisms. The results suggested that the dominating loss in these samples is due to squirt‐flow of fluid between the pores of various geometries. The contribution of the Biot‐flow loss mechanism to the total loss is negligible. The compressional‐wave quality factor was shown to be inversely correlated with rock permeability, suggesting the possibility of using attenuation as a permeability indicator tool in low‐shale, high‐porosity sandstone reservoirs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00460.x
2005-06-24
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BestA.I. and McCannC.1995. Seismic attenuation and pore‐fluid viscosity in clay‐rich reservoir sandstones. Geophysics60, 1386–1397.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BestA.I., McCannC. and SothcottJ.1994. The relationships between the velocities, attenuations and petrophysical properties of reservoir sedimentary rocks. Geophysical Prospecting42, 151–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BiotM.A.1956a. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid‐saturated porous solid (I. Low frequency range). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America28, 168–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BiotM.A.1956b. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid‐saturated porous solid (II. Higher frequency range). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America28, 179–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CastagnaJ.P., BatzleM.L. and EastwoodR.L.1985. Relationships between compressional‐wave and shear‐wave velocities in clastic silicate rocks. Geophysics50, 571–581.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ChristensenN.I. and WangH.F.1985. The influence of pore pressure and confining pressure on dynamic elastic properties of Berea sandstone. Geophysics50, 207–213.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DomenicoS.N.1974. Effect of water saturation on seismic reflectivity of sand reservoirs encased in shale. Geophysics39, 759–769.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. DomenicoS.N.1984. Rock lithology and porosity determination from shear and compressional wave velocity. Geophysics54, 76–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. DvorkinJ., MavkoG. and NurA.1995. Squirt flow in fully saturated rocks. Geophysics60, 97–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Eberhart‐PhillipsD., HanD.H. and ZobackM.D.1989. Empirical relationships among seismic velocity, effective pressure, porosity, and clay content in sandstone. Geophysics54, 82–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. GardnerG.H.F. and HarrisM.H.1968. Velocity and attenuation of the lunar interior. In: Lunar Science VII , pp. 181–183. Lunar Science Institute, Houston , TX .
    [Google Scholar]
  12. GassmannF.1951. Über die Elastizität poröser Medien. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich96, 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. HanD., NurA. and MorganF.D.1986. Effects of porosity and clay content on wave velocities in sandstones. Geophysics51, 2093–2107.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. JohnstonD.H. and ToksözM.N.1980. Ultrasonic P and S wave attenuation in dry and saturated rocks under pressure. Journal of Geophysical Research85, 925–936.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. JonesS.M., McCannC., AstinT.R. and SothcottJ.1998. The effects of pore‐fluid salinity on ultrasonic wave propagation in sandstones. Geophysics63, 928–934.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. KingM.S.1966. Wave velocities in rocks as a function of changes in overburden pressure and pore fluid saturates. Geophysics31, 50–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. KlimentosT. and McCannC.1990. Relationships between compressional wave attenuation, porosity, clay content and permeability of sandstones. Geophysics55, 998–1014.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. KlinkenbergL.J.1941. The permeability of porous media to liquids and gases. Drilling and Production Practice2, 200–213.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MavkoG.M. and NurA.1979. Wave attenuation in partially saturated rocks. Geophysics44, 161–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. McCannC. and SothcottJ.1992. Techniques for the accurate measurement of the seismic properties of rocks in the laboratory. In: Geological Applications of Wireline Logging (eds A.Hurst , C.M.Griffiths and P.Worthington ), pp. 285–299. Geological Society , Bath. ISBN 09033178X.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. MorrowC.A. and LocknerD.A.1994. Permeability differences between surface‐driven and deep drilled core samples. Geophysical Research Letters21, 2151–2154.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. O'ConnellR.J. and BudianskyB.1977. Viscoelastic properties of fluid‐saturated cracked solids. Journal of Geophysical Research82, 5719–5736.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. O'HaraS.G.1989. Elastic wave attenuation in fluid‐saturated Berea Sandstone. Geophysics54, 785–788.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. PeacockS., McCannC., SothcottJ. and AstinT.R.1994. Seismic velocities in fractured rocks: an experimental verification of Hudson's theory. Geophysical Prospecting42, 27–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. ShatiloA.P., SondergeldC. and RaiC.S.1998. Ultrasonic attenuation in Glen Pool rocks, north‐eastern Oklahoma. Geophysics63, 465–478.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. TaoG., KingM.S. and Nabi‐BidhendiM.1995. Ultrasonic wave propagation in dry and brine‐saturated sandstones as a function of effective stress: laboratory measurements and modelling. Geophysical Prospecting43, 299–327.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. TathamR.H.1982. VP/VS and lithology. Geophysics47, 336–344.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. WangZ., BatzleM.L. and NurA.1990. Effect of different pore fluids on seismic velocities in rocks. Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics26, 104–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. WangZ. and NurA.1990. Wave velocities in hydrocarbon‐saturated rocks: Experimental results. Geophysics55, 723–733.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. WhiteJ.E.1986. Biot‐Gardner theory of extensional waves in porous rods. Geophysics51, 742–745.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. WinklerK.W.1985. Dispersion analysis of velocity and attenuation in Berea sandstone. Journal of Geophysical Research90, 6793–6800.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. WinklerK. and PlonaT.J.1982. Technique for measuring ultrasonic velocity and attenuation spectra in rocks under pressure. Journal of Geophysical Research87, 10776–10780.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00460.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00460.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error