A field test of imaging properties of rotational invariants of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor

References

1. ÁdámA.1997. Magnetotelluric phase anisotropy above extensional structures of the Neogene Pannonian basin. Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity49, 1549–1557.
   [Google Scholar]
2. ÁdámA. and BielikL.1998. The crustal and upper mantle geophysical signature of narrow continental rifts in the Pannonian basin. Geophysical Journal International134, 157–171.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246x.1998.00544.x
   [Google Scholar]
3. ÁdámA., PrácserE., SzarkaL. and VargaG.1996. Mantle plumes or EM distortions in the Pannonian basin? (Inversion of deep magnetotelluric (MT) soundings along the Pannonian Geotraverse). Geophysical Transactions40, 45–78.
   [Google Scholar]
4. ÁdámA., SzarkaL. and SteinerT.1993. Magnetotelluric approximations for the asthenospheric depth beneath the Békés Graben. Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity45, 761–773.
   [Google Scholar]
5. BaşokurA.T.1994. Definitions of apparent resistivity for the presentation of magnetotelluric sounding data. Geophysical Prospecting42, 141–149.
   [Google Scholar]
6. GrowJ.A., PogácsásGy., BérczinéM.A., VárnaiP., HajduD., VargaE. and PéróCs. 1989. Tectonic and structural description of the Békés Basin. Magyar Geofizika30, 63–97.
   [Google Scholar]
7. LilleyF.E.M.1993. Magnetotelluric analysis using Mohr circles. Geophysics58, 1498–1506.DOI: 10.1190/1.1443364
   [Google Scholar]
8. MenvielleM.1984. Conductivity anomalies and channelling phenomena . DSc thesis, Université Pierre et Marie Curie , Paris ( in French ).
9. NemesiL. and StomfaiR.1992. Some supplements to the exploration of the basement of the Békés Basin. Magyar Geofizika33, 70–79 ( in Hungarian ).
   [Google Scholar]
10. PosgayK., BodokyT., HegedüsE., KovácsvölgyiS., LenkeyL., SzafiánP.et al.1995. Asthenospheric structure beneath a Neogene basin in SE Hungary. Tectonophysics252, 467–484.DOI: 10.1016/0040-1951(95)00098-4
    [Google Scholar]
11. SchmuckerU.1970. Anomalies of Geomagnetic Variations in the Southwestern United States . University of California Press, Berkeley .
    [Google Scholar]
12. SpichakV.V.1983. The program package FDM3D for numerical modelling of the three‐dimensional electromagnetic field. In: Algorithms and Programs for Solution of the Direct and Inverse Problems of Electromagnetic Induction in the Earth , pp. 58–68. IZMIRAN , Moscow (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
13. SpichakV.V.1995. On the imaging of the volcanic interior using the MT data. In: Proceedings of SDR Symposium on 3D Electromagnetics , Ridgefield . Society of Exploration Geophysicists , Tulsa , OK .
    [Google Scholar]
14. SpiesB.R. and EggersD.E.1986. The use and misuse of apparent resistivity in electromagnetic methods. Geophysics51, 1462–1471.DOI: 10.1190/1.1442194
    [Google Scholar]
15. SzarkaL.1994. Comment on ‘Definitions of apparent resistivity for the presentation of magnetotelluric sounding data’ by A.T. Başokur. Geophysical Prospecting42, 987–988.
    [Google Scholar]
16. SzarkaL.1997. A compact derivation of two‐layered magnetotelluric response. Geophysical Prospecting45, 763–774.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.1997.470284.x
    [Google Scholar]
17. SzarkaL. and MenvielleM.1997. Analysis of rotational invariants of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor. Geophysical Journal International129, 133–142.
    [Google Scholar]
18. SzarkaL., MenvielleM. and SpichakV.V.2000. Imaging properties of apparent resistivities based on rotational invariants of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica35, 149–175.
    [Google Scholar]
19. WeaverJ.T.1994. Mathematical Methods for Geo‐electromagnetic Induction . John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]