1887
Volume 53, Issue 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Shear‐wave statics in marine seismic exploration data are routinely too large to be estimated using conventional techniques. Near‐surface unconsolidated sediments are often characterized by low values of and steep velocity gradients. Minor variations in sediment properties at these depths correspond to variations in the shear‐wave velocity and will produce significant static shifts. It is suggested that a significant proportion of the shear‐wave statics solution can be estimated by performing a separate high‐resolution survey to target near‐surface unconsolidated sediments. Love‐wave, shear‐wave refraction and geotechnical measurements were individually used to form high‐resolution near‐surface shear‐wave velocity models to estimate the shear‐wave statics for a designated survey line. Comparisons with predicted statics revealed that shear‐wave statics could not be estimated using a velocity model predicted by substituting geotechnical measurements into empirical relationships. Empirical relationships represent a vast simplification of the factors that control and are therefore not sufficiently sensitive to estimate shear‐wave statics. Refraction measurements are potentially sensitive to short‐wavelength variations in sediment properties when combined with accurate navigational data. Statics estimated from Love‐wave data are less sensitive, and sometimes smoothed in appearance, since interpreted velocity values represent an average both laterally and vertically over the receiver array and the frequency–depth sensitivity range, respectively.

For the survey site, statics estimated from near‐surface irregularities using shear‐wave refraction measurements represent almost half the total statics solution. More often, this proportion will be greater when bedrock relief is less.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00482.x
2005-06-24
2020-07-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BautistaE.O. and StollR.D.1994. Remote determination of in situ sediment parameters using Love waves. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America98, 1090–1096.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BohlenT., KuglerS., KleinG. and TheilenF.2004. 1.5D inversion of lateral variation of Scholte‐wave dispersion. Geophysics69, 330–344.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. British Standards Manual
    British Standards Manual1975. Methods of Testing for Soils in Civil Engineering Purposes . British Standards Institute .
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BryanG.M. and StollR.D.1988. The dynamic shear modulus of marine sediments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America83, 2159–2164.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CaitiA., AkalT. and StollR.D.1994. Estimation of shear‐wave velocity in shallow marine sediments. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering19, 58–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. CollinsJ.A., SuttonG.H. and EwingJ.I.1996. Shear‐wave velocity structure of shallow‐water sediments in the East China Sea. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America100, 3646–3654.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DavisA.M., HuwsD.G., BennellJ.D. and ThomasD.1989. Development of a seafloor geophysical sledge. Marine Geotechnology1, 91–115.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. EwingJ., CarterJ., SuttonG. and BarstowN.1992. Shallow water sediment properties derived from high–frequency shear and interface waves. Journal of Geophysical Research97, 4739–4762.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GabrielsP., SniederR. and NoletG.1987. In situ measurements of shear‐wave velocity in sediments with higher mode Rayleigh waves. Geophysical Prospecting35, 187–196.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. GarottaR.2000. Shear Waves from Acquisition to Interpretation . Distinguished Instructor Short Course, Distinguished Instructor Series No. 3, sponsored by the Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. GehrmannT., GimpelP. and TheilenF.1984. Marine shear wave profiling. 54th SEG meeting, Atlanta , USA , Expanded Abstracts, Session S13.5.
  12. GreenlyE.1919. Geology of Anglesey . HMSO.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. HamiltonE.L.1974. Prediction of deep‐sea sediment properties: State of the art. In: Deep Sea Sediments: Physical and Mechanical Properties (ed. A.L.Inderbitzen ), pp. 1–44. Plenum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. HamiltonE.L.1976. Shear‐wave velocity versus depth in marine sediments, a review. Geophysics41, 985–996.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. HardinB.O. and RichartF.E.J.1963. Elastic wave velocities in granular soils. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, Proceedings of the ASCE98, 33–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. IranpourK., MuyzertE. and GrionS.2002. Local velocity analysis by parametric wavenumber estimation in seismic data (fk‐MUSIC). 64th EAGE conference, Florence , Italy , Extended Abstracts, P171.
  17. JensenF.B.1991. Excess attenuation in low‐frequency shallow‐water acoustics: A shear wave effect? In: Shear Waves in Marine Sediments (eds J.M.Richardson , M.D.Hovem and R.D.Stoll ), pp. 421–430. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. KayS.M.1988. Modern Spectral Estimation . Signal Processing Series. Prentice–Hall. ISBN 013598582X.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. KrimH. and VibergM.1996. Two decades of array signal processing research. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine13, 67–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. LiX.Y. and YuanJ.1999. Developing and Exploiting Effective Techniques to Overcome the Difficulties of 4C Seismic Reservoir Surveying in Deep Water. British Geological Survey, Seismology Series, Technical Report WL/99/04. Presented at the IIR 3rd Annual International Forum: Marine Seismic Data, London .
    [Google Scholar]
  21. MarsdenD.1993a. Static corrections: a review Part 1. The Leading Edge12, 43–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. MarsdenD.1993b. Static corrections: a review Part 2. The Leading Edge12, 115–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. MarsdenD.1993c. Static corrections: a review Part 3. The Leading Edge12, 210–216.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. MuyzertE.2000. Scholte wave velocity inversion for a near surface S‐velocity model and PS‐statics. 70th SEG meeting, Calgary , Canada , Expanded Abstracts, 1197–1200.
  25. PoatC.1991. Geotechnical and geophysical properties of typical beach overburden materials, Anglesey: a comparison of modelled and field data. MSc thesis, University of Wales , Bangor .
  26. ReynoldsJ.M.1997. An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics . John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. RichardsonM.D., MuziE., MiaschiB. and TurgutcanF.1991. Shear‐wave velocity gradients in near‐surface marine sediment. In: Shear Waves in Marine Sediments (eds J.M.Richardson , M.D.Hovem and R.D.Stoll ), pp. 295–304. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. SchwarzS.D. and ConwellF.R.1974. A technique for the in situ measurement of shear‐wave velocity (Vs) for deep marine foundations. Offshore Technology Conference2014, 755–762.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. SmithG.N.1990. Elements of Soil Mechanics . Blackwell Science Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. StollR.D., BryanG.M., FloodR., ChayesD. and ManleyP.1988. Shallow seismic experiments using shear waves. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America83, 93–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. TessmerG. and BehleA.1988. Common reflection point data‐stacking technique for converted waves. Geophysical Prospecting36, 671–688.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. ThomsenL.1999. Converted‐wave reflection seismology over inhomogeneous, anisotropic media. Geophysics64, 678–690.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. WinsborrowG., HuwsD.G. and MuyzertE.2003. Acquisition and inversion of Love wave data to measure the lateral variability of geo‐acoustic properties of marine sediments. Journal of Applied Geophysics54, 71–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. WoodsR.D.1991. Soil properties for shear wave propagation. In: Shear Waves in Marine Sediments (eds J.M.Richardson , M.D.Hovem and R.D.Stoll ), pp. 22–39. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. XiaJ.H., MillerR.D., ParkC.B., HunterJ.A., HarrisJ.B. and IvanovV.2002. Comparing shear‐wave velocity profiles inverted from multichannel surface wave data with borehole measurements. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering22, 181–190.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00482.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00482.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error