1887
Volume 53, Issue 5
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Vibroseis is a method that imparts coded seismic energy into the ground. The energy is recorded with geophones and then processed using the known (coded) input signal. The resulting time‐domain representation of vibroseis data is an impulsive wavetrain with wavelet properties consistent with the coded input signal convolved with the earth's reflectivity series. Historically, vibratory seismic surveys collect data from one source location at a time, summing one or more sources at each location. We present a method of designing orthogonal sweeps using the concept of combisweeps. The orthogonal sweeps allow simultaneous recording and later separation of two or more unique source locations. Orthogonality of sweeps permits separation of the data into unique source‐location field records by a conventional correlation procedure. The separation power of the orthogonal sweeps is demonstrated by a comparison between separated data and data acquired with one vibrator. Separation noise was at a negligible level for our demonstration data sets when two vibrators were located 50 m to 200 m apart. Coincident generation and recording of two vibroseis sweeps at different locations would allow almost double the amount of data to be recorded for a given occupation time and requires only half the storage medium.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00491.x
2005-08-15
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AllenK.P., JohnsonM.L. and MayJ.S.1998. High fidelity vibratory seismic (HFVS) method for acquiring seismic data. 68th SEG meeting, New Orleans , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 140–144.
  2. BaetenG., BelougneV., DalyM., JeffryesB. and MartinJ.2000. Acquisition and processing of point source measurements in land seismic. 70th SEG meeting, Calgary , Canada , Expanded Abstracts, 45–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BakerG.S., SteeplesD.W. and DrakeM.1998. Muting the noise cone in near‐surface reflection data: An example from southeastern Kansas. Geophysics63, 1332–1338.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CrawfordJ.M., DotyW.E.N. and LeeM.R.1960. Continuous signal seismograph. Geophysics25, 95–105.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. GoupillaudP.L.1976. Signal design in the ‘Vibroseis’ technique. Geophysics41, 1291–1304.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. MartinJ.E. and BaconC.W.M.1993. Simultaneous vibroseis recording. Geophysical Prospecting41, 943–968.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. MoerigR., BarrF.J. and NylandD.L.2002. Simultaneous shooting using cascaded sweeps. 72nd SEG meeting, Salt Lake City , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 74–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. PritchettW.C.1991. An example of simultaneous recording where necessary signal separation is easily achieved. Geophysics56, 9–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. RietschE.1981. Reduction of harmonic distortion in vibratory source records. Geophysical Prospecting29, 178–188.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. RozemondH.J.1996. Slip‐sweep acquisition. 66th SEG meeting, Denver , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 64–67.
  11. SeriffA.J. and KimW.H.1970. The effect of harmonic distortion in the use of vibratory surface sources. Geophysics35, 234–246.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. WernerH. and KreyTh. 1979. Combisweep – A contribution to sweep techniques. Geophysical Prospecting27, 78–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. WilkinsonK., HabiakR., SiewertA. and MillingtonG.1998. Seismic data acquisition and processing using measured motion signals on vibrators. 68th SEG meeting, New Orleans , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 144–146.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00491.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00491.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error