1887
Volume 53, Issue 5
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Imaging pre‐salt reflections for data acquired from the coastal region of the Red Sea is a task that requires prestack migration velocity analysis. Conventional post‐stack time processing lacks the lateral inhomogeneity capability, necessary for such a problem. Prestack migration velocity analysis in the vertical time domain reduces the velocity–depth ambiguity that usually hampers the performance of prestack depth‐migration velocity analysis. In prestack τ‐migration velocity analysis, the interval velocity model and the output images are defined in τ (i.e. vertical time). As a result, we avoid placing reflectors at erroneous depths during the velocity analysis process and thus avoid inaccurately altering the shape of the velocity model, which in turn speeds up the convergence to the true model. Using a 1D velocity update scheme, the prestack τ‐migration velocity analysis produces good images of data from the Midyan region of the Red Sea. For the first seismic line from this region, only three prestack τ‐migration velocity analysis iterations were required to focus pre‐salt reflections in τ. However, the second line, which crosses the first line, is slightly more complicated and thus required five iterations to reach the final, reasonably focused, τ‐image. After mapping the images for the two crossing lines to depth, using the final velocity models, the placements of reflectors in the two 2D lines were consistent at their crossing point. Some errors occurred due to the influence of out‐of‐plane reflections on 2D imaging. However, such errors are identifiable and are generally small.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00493.x
2005-08-15
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AlkhalifahT.2003. τ‐migration and velocity analysis: theory and synthetic examples. Geophysics68, 1331–1339.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AlkhalifahT., FomelS. and BiondiB.2001. The space‐time domain: theory and modelling for anisotropic media. Geophysical Journal International144, 105–113.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BiondiB., FomelS. and AlkhalifahT.1997. The focusing eikonal . Stanford Exploration project report SEP‐95, 61–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. KelamisP., BerkhoutA., VerschuurD. and RomijnR.1999. Common focus point technology – An example from the Red Sea area of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Aramco Journal of Technology FALL , 32–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. MougenotD. and Al‐ShakbisA.1998. Depth imaging a pre‐salt faulted block: a case study from the Midyan Basin (Red Sea). Saudi Aramco Journal of Technology FALL , 2–10.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00493.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00493.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error