1887
Volume 54, Issue 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

A joint inversion of both first and refracted arrivals is applied on a seismic line, acquired onshore, in order to obtain a well‐resolved velocity field for the computation of static corrections. The use of different arrivals in the inversion involves exploiting the information derived from the different raypaths associated with each wave type, thus enhancing the reliability of the inversion. The data was gathered by Saudi Aramco in an area of the Arabian Peninsula characterized by strong lateral variations, both in topography and shallow velocity, and where therefore a well‐defined near‐surface velocity field is important. In addition to velocity, the depth distribution of the quality factor is computed from the tomographic inversion of the seismic‐signal frequency shift. Thus, the ‐factor field is used to perform an inverse ‐data filtering and improve the resolution of the final stacked section.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2006.00563.x
2006-11-02
2020-08-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BöhmG. and PetronioL.2003. 3D turning ray tomography in a real case. 65th EAGE Conference, Stavanger , Norway , Extended Abstracts, D‐25.
  2. BridleR., Al‐HomailM., Al‐InaiziS. and LeyR.2004. Near‐surface layer model using first break arrivals applied to 3D blocks. 74th SEG Meeting, Denver , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 2116–2119.
  3. ChopraS. and AlexeevV.2004. A new approach to enhancement of frequency bandwidth of surface seismic data. First Break22,31–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CohenJ.K. and StockwellJ.W.Jr. 2001. CWP/SU: Seismic Unix Release 35: a Free Package for Seismic Research and Processing . Center for Wave Phenomena, Colorado School of Mines .
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CoppensF.1985. First arrival picking on common‐offset trace collections for automatic estimation of static corrections. Geophysical Prospecting33, 1212–1231.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. CoxM.1999. Static Corrections for Seismic Reflection Surveys (ed. E. F.Scherrer ). Society for Exploration Geophysicists , Tulsa , USA .
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DvorkinD.P. and MavkoG.2006. Modelling attenuation in reservoir and nonreservoir rock. The Leading Edge25, 194–197.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. HolcombeH.T. and WojslawR.S.1992. Spatially weighted trim stacking: a technique for pre‐stack noise suppression. 62nd SEG Meeting, New Orleans , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1157–1160.
  9. KlimentosT.1995. Attenuation of P‐ and S‐waves as a method of distinguishing gas and condensate from oil and water. Geophysics60, 447–458.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. MarsdenD.1993a. Static corrections – a review, Part I. The Leading Edge12, 43–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. MarsdenD.1993b. Static corrections – a review, Part II. The Leading Edge12, 115–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. QuanY. and HarrisJ.M.1997. Seismic attenuation tomography using the frequency shift method. Geophysics62, 895–905.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. RossiG., CoruboloP., BöhmG., CeraggioliE., Dell'AversanaP., MorandiS., PolettoF. and VesnaverA.2001. Joint 3‐D inversion of SWD and surface seismic data. First Break19, 453–459.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. RossiG., MadrussaniG., GeiD., BöhmG. and CamerlenghiA.2005. Velocity and attenuation 3D tomography for gas‐hydrates studies: the NW offshore Svalbard case. 5th International Conference on Gas Hydrates, Trondheim , Norway , Expanded Abstracts, 677–682.
  15. RossiG., MadrussaniG. and VesnaverA.2000. Adaptive 3D joint inversion of direct, reflected and refracted arrivals to image sea floor and currents. In: Experimental Acoustic Inversion Methods for Exploration in Shallow Water Environment (eds A.Caiti , J. P.Hermand , S. M.Jesus and M. B.Porter ), pp. 235–248. Kluwer. Academic Publishers, Dordrecht .
    [Google Scholar]
  16. VesnaverA.1995. Null space reduction in the linearized tomographic inversion. In: Full Field Inversion Methods in Ocean and Seismo‐Acoustics (eds O.Diachok , A.Caiti , P.Gerstof and H.Schmidt ), pp. 139–145. Kluwer. Academic Publishers, Dordrecht .
    [Google Scholar]
  17. VesnaverA. and BöhmG.2000. Staggered or adapted grids for seismic tomography?The Leading Edge9, 944–950.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. VesnaverA., BöhmG., MadrussaniG., PetersenS. and RossiG.1999. Tomographic imaging by reflected and refracted arrivals at the North‐Sea. Geophysics64, 1852–1862.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ZanziL.1990. Inversion of refraction arrivals: a few problems. Geophysical Prospecting38, 339–364.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. ZanziL. and CarliniA.1991. Refraction statics in the wavenumber domain. Geophysics56, 1661–1670.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ZhuX., SixtaD.P. and AngstmanB.G.1992. Tomostatics: turning‐ray tomography + static corrections. The Leading Edge11, 15–23.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2006.00563.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2006.00563.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error