Volume 54, Issue 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478



The rough sea surface causes perturbations in the seismic data that can be significant for time‐lapse studies. The perturbations arise because the reflection response of the non‐flat sea perturbs the seismic wavelet. In order to remove these perturbations from the received seismic data, special deconvolution methods can be used, but these methods require, as input, the time varying wave elevation above each hydrophone in the streamer. In addition, the vertical displacement of the streamer itself must also be known at the position of each hydrophone and at all times. This information is not available in conventional seismic acquisition. However, it can be obtained from the hydrophone measurements provided that the hydrophones are recorded individually (not grouped), that the recording bandwidth is extended down to 0.05 Hz and that data are recorded without gaps between the shot records.

The sea surface elevation, and also the wave‐induced vertical displacement of the streamer, can be determined from the time‐varying pressure that the sea waves cause in the hydrophone measurements. When this was done experimentally, using a single sensor seismic streamer without a conventional low cut filter, the wave induced pressure variations were easily detected. The inversion of these experimental data gives results for the sea surface elevation that are consistent with the weather and sea state at the time of acquisition. A high tension approximation allows a simplified solution of the equations that does not demand a knowledge of the streamer tension. However, best results at the tail end of the streamer are obtained using the general equation.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. AmundsenL., RøstenT., RobertssonJ.O.A. and KraghE.2004. On rough‐sea deghosting of single streamer seismic data using pressure gradient approximations, submitted to. Geophysics in press:.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. CarterD.J.T., ChallenorP.G., EwingJ.A., PittE.G., SrokoszM.A. and TuckerM.J.1986. Estimating Wave Climate Parameters for Engineering Applications . HMSO OTH. 86228, ISBN 0 11 412858 8.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dowling. 1988. The dynamics of towed flexible cylinders part 1. Neutrally buoyant elements. Journal of Fluid Mech187, 507–532.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. HampsonG. and JakubowiczH.1990. Effects of source and receiver motion on seismic data, 60th Ann. Internal. Mtg: Soc. of Expl. Geophys.859–862.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kinsman. 1965. Wind Waves, their generation and propagation on the ocean surface, Dover , 1965,1984 ISBN 0–486–64652–1.
  6. KraghE. and CombeeL.2000. Using a seismic reflector for resolving streamer depth and sea surface profiles. First Break18 (11), 463–467.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. LawsR. and KraghE.2002. Rough seas and time‐lapse seismic. Geophysical Prospecting50, 195–208.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LawsR. and KraghE.2005. Light Bulbs Used for Seismic Illumination, Extended Abstract P053, 67th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Madrid.
  9. RobertssonJ.O.A. and KraghE.2002. Rough‐sea deghosting using a single streamer and a pressure gradient approximation. Geophysics67, 2005–2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Sander. 1982. Three dimensional configuration of a towed system. Ocean Engng V9, N5, 483–499.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Taylor. 1952. Analysis of the swimming of long and narrow animals. Proceedings of the Roy Society LondonA214, 158–183.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error